Hypothesis on why agriculture started in Eurasia not Africa

[SewerGoat]

The Neolithic period represents the cradle of humanity in many ways. While before settling down, we led a primal existence and dealt with few, if any, abstract concepts about the world beyond human existence, the Neolithic and the advent of agriculture ushered in a time of reflection.

That agriculture began almost simultaneously in ancient Anatolia and Europe in general, and not in Africa after the first major migration of Homo sapiens, is no surprise to me. Central Africa, in its climatic essence, exhibits four seasons that, in many respects, differ little. A winter in Africa is not a true winter-vegetation continues in full bloom, and nights remain tame. Besides the consistent climate, Central Africa offers a variety of animals that can be hunted continuously throughout the year. In such a climatic environment, a hunter-gatherer lifestyle is encouraged, unlike in Europe and Asia.

In Europe, if one doesn't start thinking about winter as early as spring, one can be sure of certain death. Due to the dead vegetation and the animals that also hibernate during the winter, humans sought alternative food sources.

The important implication I want to emphasize here, however, is that actively thinking about the future was of great importance, especially in Europe, and precisely for this reason ultimately led to the first cradle of civilization in Mesopotamia.

One could also consider the aspect of IQ in this discussion, for example, but I believe that the main vehicle of civilization in the Neolithic period was climatic adaptation.

There is linguistic evidence that the understanding of the future held by the remaining archaic African hunter-gatherers differs from what we find in the Indo-European languages.

 

[IWWorkER]

Maybe that's why niggers never evolved past the animal state.

 

[ANTAGONIST]

Niggers were not the original humans, humans didn't come from Africa.

 

[IWWorkER]

Niggers were not the original humans, humans didn't come from Africa.

 

[vic624]

Niggers were not the original humans, humans didn't come from Africa.

Africa is as big across as North America. The parts of Africa that are considered places humans evolved are in the Horn area, not anywhere near the origin area of the slave trade niggers. Regardless, the latter sometimes reference themselves as "original man" which shows ignorance of the Bantu expansion.

 

[vic624]

There is linguistic evidence that the understanding of the future held by the remaining archaic African hunter-gatherers differs from what we find in the Indo-European languages.

There's supposed to be some Amazon native language that is the only one without reference to numbers. They simply use more and less.

 

[foidslayer4ever]

It was thanks to my race the phenocians that we agriculture and language was made, you are all welcome.

 

[Pikacel]

It was thanks to my race the phenocians that we agriculture and language was made, you are all welcome.

Phoenicians are underrated

 

[SewerGoat]

It was thanks to my race the phenocians that we agriculture and language was made, you are all welcome.

Your civilisation started long after the first farmers in Eurasia, long after the neolithic. I am talking about the period before that. The Sumerians were ahead with the language and agriculture. But this isn't a contest. If you see this as a contest, the point flew over your head

 

[Lowiqretarded]

According to Gimbutas, Anatolian farmers were quite matriarchal and cuckolded. Is that true?

 

[SewerGoat]

According to Gimbutas, Anatolian farmers were quite matriarchal and cuckolded. Is that true?

The study is based on the Çatalhöyük bury site. What does the site show about the burying process - girls and young women, received more offerings than males of the same age in their resting place. That's all. Yes they were buried with more grace, more offerings. There is absolutely no evidence of them being matriarchal at all from that information. In fact we don't even know what language they spoke exactly. New age liberal interference with that "study".

 

[Lowiqretarded]

The study is based on the Çatalhöyük bury site. What does the site show about the burying process - girls and young women, received more offerings than males of the same age in their resting place. That's all. Yes they were buried with more grace, more offerings. There is absolutely no evidence of them being matriarchal at all from that information. In fact we don't even know what language they spoke exactly. New age liberal interference with that "study".

Was the matriarchy voluntary?

 

[SewerGoat]

Was the matriarchy voluntary?

As i said, there is no evidence of a matriarchy

 

[Lowiqretarded]

As i said, there is no evidence of a matriarchy

Has a matriarchal society never existed? Apart from undeveloped African tribes?

 

[SewerGoat]

Has a matriarchal society never existed? Apart from undeveloped African tribes?

Not what i said. There been a few in east Asia and the region in sub sahara africa. As i said, there is just no evidence at all that the early anatolian farmers were a matriarchal society from the evidence presented in the Burial site alone

 

[Lowiqretarded]

Not what i said. There been a few in east Asia and the region in sub sahara africa. As i said, there is just no evidence at all that the early anatolian farmers were a matriarchal society from the evidence presented in the Burial site alone

Do you think Anatolian farmers were what made Europe? I ask because the Minoans and Mycenaeans were almost entirely Anatolian farmers. Would Hitler have preferred Anatolian farmers, in his concept of soil and blood, to the Aryans of the steppe? Also, because Germans and Western Europeans have more Neolithic farmer blood.

 

[SewerGoat]

Do you think Anatolian farmers were what made Europe? I ask because the Minoans and Mycenaeans were almost entirely Anatolian farmers. Would Hitler have preferred Anatolian farmers, in his concept of soil and blood, to the Aryans of the steppe? Also, because Germans and Western Europeans have more Neolithic farmer blood.

No idea about the Hitler talk. Anatolian farmers alone did not make Europe what it is today alone. Philosophically, mathematically if we stay in that time period or short after that, Sumeria including Mesopotamia played a big role along side ancient Egypt - in fact the whole orient was in that time period more advanced than western and north europe. By the time these people figured out mathematical formulas - nordics of europe were still living a semi hunter gatherer lifestyle isolated from most of that, with a few but important historical exceptions since the anatolian farmers did migrate also to the north and did pass over both part of their lifestyle and their indo european language mixing it with the natives.

 

[Lowiqretarded]

No idea about the Hitler talk. Anatolian farmers alone did not made Europe what it is today alone. Philosophically, mathematically if we stay in that time period or short after that, Sumeria including Mesopotamia played a big role along side ancient Egypt - in fact the whole orient was in that time period more advanced than western and north europe. By the time these people figured out mathematical formulas - nordics of europe were still living a semi hunter gatherer lifestyle isolated from most of that, with a few but important historical exceptions since the anatolian farmers did migrate also to the north and did pass over both part of their lifestyle and their indo european language mixing it with the natives.

Most northern Europeans have at least 1/3 Anatolian farmers. I think that Anglo-Saxons are primarily Anatolian farmers.

 

[literallyretarded]

The Neolithic period represents the cradle of humanity in many ways. While before settling down, we led a primal existence and dealt with few, if any, abstract concepts about the world beyond human existence, the Neolithic and the advent of agriculture ushered in a time of reflection.

That agriculture began almost simultaneously in ancient Anatolia and Europe in general, and not in Africa after the first major migration of Homo sapiens, is no surprise to me. Central Africa, in its climatic essence, exhibits four seasons that, in many respects, differ little. A winter in Africa is not a true winter-vegetation continues in full bloom, and nights remain tame. Besides the consistent climate, Central Africa offers a variety of animals that can be hunted continuously throughout the year. In such a climatic environment, a hunter-gatherer lifestyle is encouraged, unlike in Europe and Asia.

In Europe, if one doesn't start thinking about winter as early as spring, one can be sure of certain death. Due to the dead vegetation and the animals that also hibernate during the winter, humans sought alternative food sources.

The important implication I want to emphasize here, however, is that actively thinking about the future was of great importance, especially in Europe, and precisely for this reason ultimately led to the first cradle of civilization in Mesopotamia.

One could also consider the aspect of IQ in this discussion, for example, but I believe that the main vehicle of civilization in the Neolithic period was climatic adaptation.

There is linguistic evidence that the understanding of the future held by the remaining archaic African hunter-gatherers differs from what we find in the Indo-European languages.

cuase niggers are stupid you can see that in their iq

 

[SewerGoat]

I think that Anglo-Saxons are primarily Anatolian farmers.

I agree. Most Anglo-Saxons who do a sensible Dna test get a high connection with early Anatolian farmers. I see the point you are trying to make - connecting to your Hitler thing, but the problem is that the most Dna percentage existing today of ancient Anatolian farmers is found in Sardinians not Anglo-Saxons.

 

[RandomGuy]

Maybe that's why niggers never evolved past the animal state.

View: https://youtu.be/rGls8Eau6ls?si=jJGyr5tikQKX_iWp

 

[Emba]

Maybe that's why niggers never evolved past the animal state.

 

[Lowiqretarded]

I agree. Most Anglo-Saxons who do a sensible Dna test get a high connection with early Anatolian farmers. I see the point you are trying to make - connecting to your Hitler thing, but the problem is that the most Dna percentage existing today of ancient Anatolian farmers is found in Sardinians not Anglo-Saxons.

Northern Italians also have a fairly high Anatolian farmer.

 

[SewerGoat]

Northern Italians also have a fairly high Anatolian farmer.
View attachment 1700704

Yeah. Basically a lot of latin countries