Sure, escaping civilisation to hunt in the wild and experiment seems antithetical to improving but it makes so much sense Ngl.
Without the creativity, mobility, perspective and adaptability that stems from being forced to experiment and hunt in the woods, you’re incapable of truly innovating. It gives you a sense of ‘spirit’ that purely sedentary people will never have. This ‘spirit’ is what differentiates the cultural dominance and imperial glory of the Jomon Japan from the ossified and derivative sedentary China.
It’s why the Asian races (and Copts) have the most ancient and great civilisations yet never managed to industrialise, while Western agoge/Mannerbund people learned to adopt, innovate and surpass them 100 times over within a fraction of the time. They simply lacked the artisanal and experimental character necessary to break out of agrarian despotism.
I would even go further to say that HGs and ‘barbarians’ (including farming tribes) in general are more civilised than state-bound agrarian people. The most high IQ people who changed course of history were stateless tribes: Indo-Europeans, Greek Sea Peoples, Germanics, Jews, Quraysh etc while ‘civilised’ farmers are Shitskins, Fellaheen, Ethiopians, Dog-eating Chinks etc just backwards animalistic subhuman.
Again sounds crazy on paper, but when you realise what civilisation is about (igloo construction by savages, non-state merchants, bizarre philosophy by schizo incels, cavemen drawings) it makes so much sense. Cities first started off as shelters for the displaced, they had nothing to do with states whatsoever and were initially built by HG savages not village farmers or tribal lords. Only later were they adopted by farmers as a form of useful technology.
Tbh this concept of ‘barbarism’ is just Judaic propaganda to feminise and shitskin-ify whites into passive goyslaves. Basically destroying the Faustian will of adventure that enabled whites to dominate the stagnant Orient. It’s diabolical AF.
You’re conditioned to associate risk-taking, aggression and exploration with being a nigger. It’s sad.
Without the creativity, mobility, perspective and adaptability that stems from being forced to experiment and hunt in the woods, you’re incapable of truly innovating. It gives you a sense of ‘spirit’ that purely sedentary people will never have. This ‘spirit’ is what differentiates the cultural dominance and imperial glory of the Jomon Japan from the ossified and derivative sedentary China.
It’s why the Asian races (and Copts) have the most ancient and great civilisations yet never managed to industrialise, while Western agoge/Mannerbund people learned to adopt, innovate and surpass them 100 times over within a fraction of the time. They simply lacked the artisanal and experimental character necessary to break out of agrarian despotism.
I would even go further to say that HGs and ‘barbarians’ (including farming tribes) in general are more civilised than state-bound agrarian people. The most high IQ people who changed course of history were stateless tribes: Indo-Europeans, Greek Sea Peoples, Germanics, Jews, Quraysh etc while ‘civilised’ farmers are Shitskins, Fellaheen, Ethiopians, Dog-eating Chinks etc just backwards animalistic subhuman.
Again sounds crazy on paper, but when you realise what civilisation is about (igloo construction by savages, non-state merchants, bizarre philosophy by schizo incels, cavemen drawings) it makes so much sense. Cities first started off as shelters for the displaced, they had nothing to do with states whatsoever and were initially built by HG savages not village farmers or tribal lords. Only later were they adopted by farmers as a form of useful technology.
Tbh this concept of ‘barbarism’ is just Judaic propaganda to feminise and shitskin-ify whites into passive goyslaves. Basically destroying the Faustian will of adventure that enabled whites to dominate the stagnant Orient. It’s diabolical AF.
You’re conditioned to associate risk-taking, aggression and exploration with being a nigger. It’s sad.
Last edited:
