The premium won't be that high because there will be a lot more competition, and much lower barrier to entry for alternative internet service providers. I don't mind paying $10 more a month to have freedom online. I rather trust the free market than the cucked government intervening with their soy regulations any day.
That can't happen as long as there is free market competition. The supply will make the demand price lower. This is basic economics.
We only have a few monopoly internet service providers because they're the only ones that can comply with all the government regulations. Without strict regulations stopping alternative internet service providers, there will be more competition that will drive the prices down.
Nah man pretty sure they would still vote for Biden regardless. They love to dissociate from anything that breaks their version of reality. If Stalin was alive and well, and ran for the Democratic Party against Trump, I'm certain half of America would vote for him. That's how dumb people have become.
There's a screen at the end.
That graph seems off, I highly doubt Reddit ever had positive sentiment for Trump. They are blinded by pure hatred.
I don't know any local internet service providers in my area, all we have are the main monopolies to choose from. Providing internet will never be too expensive or many people will stop using it, which will decrease the amount of customers providers have. They will also be protested against by millions of people for price gauging.
With no internet regulations it will be easier for free speech internet service providers to offer their service. The government doesn't want unlimited internet providers for consumers to choose from, because they won't be able to pay them all off and control them to not allow things they don't like.
The health care in countries with less government intervention are a lot cheaper than the US, and prescription drugs are easier to get, and service is quicker.
They wouldn't have to regulate twitter, because the free social media market will be the one that regulates it for us. If there were many other uncucked twitter platforms to choose from, then twitter would play nice in order not to lose its users. Now there's no uncucked version of twitter because domain providers make it very expensive to host sites like that where you can upload 1000's of gigabytes of videos and pictures a minute.
Incels in ethnic countries probably look at American elections and worries about corruption with amusement tbh
Politicians of ethnic countries are much worse. In third world a politician can kill you or rape a women on a live TV show and people will still vote for him.
Yeah everyone says that too.
So many people are fed up with twitter. There would be a thousand uncucked versions of twitter to choose from if the government wasn't involved in regulating online services. It will be very expensive to make an uncucked twitter the way things are now, and after spending lots of money it can be taken down by the government for being uncucked.
It's too expensive for a group of uncucked men to make a new twitter. Twitter can handle uploading 1000's of gigabytes of data a minute, that will be very expensive to get that amount of bandwidth, and after spending so much money the government is able to walk in and shut it down any time if they don't like what's posted on there. So the way things are no one thinks it's worth investing in an uncucked twitter that will probably not be around for long.
.co doesn't cost that much to run compared with an uncucked twitter killer with millions of users.
hostingtribunal.com
I don't know those guys or that story yet.
its meth
those retards would still vote for biden even if they saw the video before voting
.co doesn't cost that much to run compared with an uncucked twitter killer with millions of users.
Here are the top cdn providers.
The Best CDN Providers in 2022
Choosing the right CDN can be tough. There are just so many options. Fear not, we've done the heavy lifting! Join us for a look at the Best CDN Providers in 2022.
They are all cucked and very expensive for the high capacity storages. Cdn77 is the cheapest one. A site like twitter will need at least 150 tb of storage every month, so it will cost almost $1400 a month to run.
View attachment 365735
Imagine if the uncucked twitter was made then got terminated after a few months because the government told the cdn provider to shut it down. The makers of the site would lose around $10,000. So making an uncucked twitter is very high risk with government regulations.
If you don't have your own network of servers you have no choice but to use cdn's. Here are the cucked terms of service for the main cdn providers.
View attachment 365741View attachment 365742View attachment 365743View attachment 365744View attachment 365745View attachment 365746
An uncucked twitter wouldn't last long with all those cucked rules from the top cdn's. The government needs to stop regulating cdn's, and let customers of them make uncucked sites without fear their site will be terminated later on and lose their investment.
I don't know those guys or that story yet.
I saw a guy on quora who basically said that people are lying about Hunter
Its goes beyond terms and conditions. Those things should be limited to how you want to run your social media platform to disallow harmful shit like blatant racism or child porn. Not turn it into a propaganda machine for a certain political ideology.
They can come up with regulatory laws. And the government can in principle nationalise these companies. But that would not ve the American thing to do.
They are also collectively owned by the the same set of AMCs that share their directors, staff and shareholders. Layers of bullshit to hide the same set of people who own everything
This is exactly the kind of thing you would expect to hear from a slave owner. New situations arise which are in need of new laws. Internet is one such situation. You are trying to write off the power and responsibilty that big tech and social media hold in the modern world. Their policies can alone influence election results in many countries. Policies which by the way have no economic bearing whatsoever. To ignore all this in favor of the purely economic relationship they hold with advertisers is farcical. And to suggest that the user base at large, the people whom advertisements are taregeted at, are not stakeholders is even more laughable. These companies are acting like literal propaganda machines with no responsibility
As much as they claim to be private enterprises they are not completely independent. They are still using public infrastructure and utilities. Internet is very different from anything that came before. New laws can easily be made to maintain a standard of freedom of speech in big social media. They are not exactly being punished for success. They are making billions of dollars out of this deal. The least they could do is not become censorship crazed propaganda machines for a certain agenda. Twitter is so ubiquitous that politicians and even heads of states of most countries have accounts there and use it as a mouth piece to reach their people. This is no mere "private enterprise". It wouldn't hurt if the Governments that are actually elected by the people(as opposed to company executives with questionable motives) have some regulatory control over this bullshit.
I have heard popular liberals unironically proclaim that they would vote for anyone or anything that is not Trump. They simply don't care
everything I saw so far is just mature whores
You can download a MEGA from here:
You can download a MEGA from here:
/pol/ - Hunter fucked many many women - Politically Incorrect - 4chan
Hunter fucked many many women - "/pol/ - Politically Incorrect" is 4chan's board for discussing and debating politics and current events.boards.4chan.org
Because .co is niche. The President of Uganda is not running part of his election campaign on incels.co
from last I checked half have been uploaded and the uploader claims there's no kiddie shit or anything that controversial
Nobody. Atleast not yet. Not until laws are mad to ban certain kind of social media from practicing censorship.
Co doesn't push anti trans propaganda. Trans content is not allowed simply because its not a solution to inceldom among heterosexual men. So trans psyop is avoided. As I said this site is niche(about inceldom).
That's not free market because they are forced to follow fcc regulations. If there was really free management then it would be easy to find a cdn that doesn't care about dmca's or local laws, because the cdn is located in a country with a let less cucked rules. But it's impossible to find a cdn that will guarantee you'll have free speech without being worried about being taken down. America has no jurisdiction in some countries, but for the internet it seems different, even cdn's in uncucked countries have the same rules as the others because the regulations make it easy for overseas cdn's to be sued or shut down if they don't comply.
If this site was as big as twitter with millions of blackpillers, I bet the cucked government would finally try to take it down. But we have only a few thousand active members now, so they don't care to shut it down. Plus, it's not as expensive as twitter to have a backup to this site because of the low storage, so shutting a forum down doesn't mean it will be gone forever in most cases.
Twitter was allowed to get big because it's cucked and "followed the rules". If an uncucked platform got big and didn't enforce dmcas or local laws, they would get cracked down on by the fbi very fast.
If you have to worry about copyright then you can be taken down at any time by infiltrators who keep posting copyrighted material. Also to prove they're not cucked they shouldn't enforce that.
Talking about smoking weed or taking an ass picture of a rostie in the street can be considered against the law, but we do it here anyway.
