Ironically, being the only species on Earth that has the ability to have an abstract concept of logic has made us the mode illogical species on Earth. Every animal will begin trying to fuck as soon as they reach puberty, and they will fuck any of their fellow species of the opposite sex as soon as they are releasing signals that they are fertile, such as pheromones. Meanwhile, humans, both male and female, are fertile from about 12 onwards, and yet we say that it is morally wrong to engage in sex with that age group if you are an arbitrary number of years above it. Hell, it's morally wrong to even be attracted to them (which is literally thoughtcrime, by the way). Even 14-16 year olds, who are essentially fully physically developed and having sex with each other, are off limits if you are 18ish and up.
There is no logic to this morality, and agecuck soys and roasties will inevitably move to group shaming tactics and herd mentality if they are challenged. Literally all of the science available shows that most men are at the very least ephebophilic and arguably the majority are also hebephilic, and yet soys/roasties will still call them pedophiles. What other animal has the ability to shame it's peers for it's own natural, primal instincts? Only humans.
The fact is that, as dictated by nature, as soon as a girl has her first period, and as soon as a boy can cum white, they can consent to sex. Yes, they are mature enough to consent, and there is literally no reason that this should mean that they can only consent with those close in age to them. There is no logic to that.
"But they are not mentally mature yet"
No one is ever fully mentally mature. The mind continues to change and develop until death.
"But they are too young to have kids, so it is too risky for them to have sex!"
Well then they shouldn't be allowed to have sex with each other, since adolescents can get each other pregnant. Since soys believe that adolescents can have sex with each other, this risk is the same for if they have sex with an 18+ adult. Arguably the latter is better because if there is at least one more mature adult, the risk of pregnancy can be more effectively managed. Also if soys truly cared about the risk of pregnancy, they would not promote fornication or sex outside of wedlock, but they do.
"But if there is an agegap it means it is coercive/manipulation"
Why though? Why would that mean that it is necessarily manipulative? Indoctrinating kids in school is far more manipulative and immoral but soys love that.
At the end of the day, agecucking stems from roastie jealousy, and they exercise their power through feminism. It really is that simple. Roastoids do not care about morality, logic or 'children', they care about artificially inflating their SMVs. Mark my words, it will soon be socially unacceptable for a man to date a few years below his own age. My friend's gf thinks it is creepy for us to be attracted to 18/19 because"They are just le teenagers!" You will see this attitude grow because of hysterical zoomer girls hitting the wall in the coming years. Of course, this will not apply to "sex workers" because err, that's somehow different (you can't date an 18 year old if you are too old but hiring an 18yo escort is le empowering!). Don't ask questions! Oh, and it is also perfectly fine for 14yo girls to dance in skimpy clothing on tiktok because that is "empowering" but you'd better not get aroused by them if you are over 18!
tl;dr don't underestimate how much of our society has been created purely on the basis of roastie jealousy and desire to maintain SMV into their post-wall years. We have moved on from basing societal morals on either logic or religion and now base it on the estrogenised brain farts of washed up roastie feminists Animals are better than us because they are unable to have a concept of feminism and thus humans will always be the most cucked species.
There is no logic to this morality, and agecuck soys and roasties will inevitably move to group shaming tactics and herd mentality if they are challenged. Literally all of the science available shows that most men are at the very least ephebophilic and arguably the majority are also hebephilic, and yet soys/roasties will still call them pedophiles. What other animal has the ability to shame it's peers for it's own natural, primal instincts? Only humans.
The fact is that, as dictated by nature, as soon as a girl has her first period, and as soon as a boy can cum white, they can consent to sex. Yes, they are mature enough to consent, and there is literally no reason that this should mean that they can only consent with those close in age to them. There is no logic to that.
"But they are not mentally mature yet"No one is ever fully mentally mature. The mind continues to change and develop until death. "But they are too young to have kids, so it is too risky for them to have sex!" Well then they shouldn't be allowed to have sex with each other, since adolescents can get each other pregnant. Since soys believe that adolescents can have sex with each other, this risk is the same for if they have sex with an 18+ adult. Arguably the latter is better because if there is at least one more mature adult, the risk of pregnancy can be more effectively managed. Also if soys truly cared about the risk of pregnancy, they would not promote fornication or sex outside of wedlock, but they do. "But if there is an agegap it means it is coercive/manipulation" Why though? Why would that mean that it is necessarily manipulative? Indoctrinating kids in school is far more manipulative and immoral but soys love that.At the end of the day, agecucking stems from roastie jealousy, and they exercise their power through feminism. It really is that simple. Roastoids do not care about morality, logic or 'children', they care about artificially inflating their SMVs. Mark my words, it will soon be socially unacceptable for a man to date a few years below his own age. My friend's gf thinks it is creepy for us to be attracted to 18/19 because
"They are just le teenagers!" You will see this attitude grow because of hysterical zoomer girls hitting the wall in the coming years. Of course, this will not apply to "sex workers" because err, that's somehow different (you can't date an 18 year old if you are too old but hiring an 18yo escort is le empowering!). Don't ask questions! Oh, and it is also perfectly fine for 14yo girls to dance in skimpy clothing on tiktok because that is "empowering" but you'd better not get aroused by them if you are over 18!tl;dr don't underestimate how much of our society has been created purely on the basis of roastie jealousy and desire to maintain SMV into their post-wall years. We have moved on from basing societal morals on either logic or religion and now base it on the estrogenised brain farts of washed up roastie feminists
Animals are better than us because they are unable to have a concept of feminism and thus humans will always be the most cucked species.
