Theory How to take down Onlyfans thots: charge them with indecent exposure ("cyberflashing")

[Atavistic Autist]

It is illegal to expose your nude body in public for sexual gratification, and a current area of law that is undeveloped in this regard concerns its application to the internet.

Given that social media platforms effectively constitute a public space, it stands to reason that when onlyfans thots post lewd pictures of themselves without the consent of the general public who will be viewing their posts (e.g., in the replies to trending twitter content), that this could be understood as indecent exposure.

All it would take is political and prosecutorial will for them to be criminally prosecuted under such statues.

At least in Britain, there is precedent and even specific laws that enable prosecution for "cyberflashing." But of course, this was a consequence of foids being sent dick pics by men

In March 2024, a 39-year-old man became the first person in England and Wales to be convicted of the new offence of cyberflashing, part of the Online Safety Act. He had sent unsolicited photos of his genitals to a 15-year-old girl and a woman.

However, these exact same standards could easily be applied to onlyfans thots who expose their nude bodies to men.

In America, a legal challenge to this would involve the question of free speech (given that pornography is technically considered "free speech"). And yet there are limits to where you can display pornography -- where it would be considered obscene. Namely, you cannot display it in public places, which is a designation that should include social media

Yet another legal challenge could come from the argument that Onlyfans thots aren't exposing themselves for "sexual gratification" at all, but just as a commercial venture (similarly protected by "muh free speech")

Evidence against this could include transcripts from the AI/paid chat flirters these Onlyfans thots employ to bait simps, which technically indicate sexual gratification as a motive for their conduct

Them having to defend against this would be reminiscent of Alex Jones having to argue in court that his whole show was just "for entertainment," and not serious. Which would be lulzy in itself, tbh

 

[Atavistic Autist]

Another problem is that foids can "cyberflash" or irl flash you while still technically being clothed (just barely).

It is typical for foids to dress half-naked, which somehow isn't indecent exposure.

And yet a man who urinates nearby a playground can become a sex offender for life

This is ostensibly because of "muh children," and yet there are plenty of children on the internet who are being exposed to lewd content on social media. The average age of a child's exposure to online pornography is 12, iirc.

 

[K1ng N0th1ng]

It is typical for foids to dress half-naked, which somehow isn't indecent exposure.

They put them in fucking ads everywhere.

Yet another legal challenge could come from the argument that Onlyfans thots aren't exposing themselves for "sexual gratification" at all, but just as a commercial venture (protected by "muh free speech")

 

[Atavistic Autist]

They put them in fucking ads everywhere.

Obscenity as a concept has no meaning if the average foid can dress so provocatively in public and in publicized media.

The only thing that saves us from being completely inundated with foid obscenity is the obesity epidemic, which makes many foids pig disgusting and want to cover up their bodies

Fat bitches legit be walking around in sweaters in the middle of the summer. They're practically putting on burqas

Obesity effects women more than men

 

[VλREN]

Based Rommel enjoyer

 

[VλREN]

SOME 40 YEAR FOID IN A BIKKNI GAVE ME A MASSIVE ERECTION WHEN I WAS A WEE 5 YEAR OLD AT THE WATER PARK (hey lady you gave a five year old future incel a hard on are you proud bitch?)

 

[Atavistic Autist]

SOME 40 YEAR FOID IN A BIKKNI GAVE ME A MASSIVE ERECTION WHEN I WAS A WEE 5 YEAR OLD AT THE WATER PARK (hey lady you gave a five year old future incel a hard on are you proud bitch?)

Once when I was a teenager, I was fapping in the ocean while in one of those floating tube things

I was masturbating to the images -- etched in my memory -- of all the hot foids who were practically naked on the beach around me

Some woman swam by me as I did this. I'm not sure if she noticed or not. But if she did, then me fapping was hardly anymore obscene than the norm there

It's what's so ironic about this case:


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bJzeEGAi3_4


This woman was driven to suicide due to the shame of being caught masturbating on a beach

It's so funny that only this is what "crosses the line" these days -- where suddenly you need to feel ashamed and experience social consequences

When this entire soyciety is basically an exhibitionist's/voyeur's paradise

Relevant thread:

[ERfuel] First amendment auditors film sluts without their consent in Isla Vista, California

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ce4FgK5uCv0 This is the college town that Elliot Rodger liberated

incels.is

 

[VλREN]

Once I when I was a teenager, I was fapping in the ocean while in one of those floating tube things

Bro no fucking way, I did something similar when I was 16 at a small water park, I was half submerged in one of those inflatable donuts. eventually i snapped and gave in to my hormones because of this hot foid lifeguard but I ended stopping after a few seconds because it felt wrong.

But regardless These whores must atleast realize that they are sexually arousing young underaged boy.

 

[Atavistic Autist]

Bro no fucking way, I did something similar when I was 16 at a small water park, I was half submerged in one of those inflatable donuts. eventually i snapped and gave in to my hormones because of this hot foid lifeguard but I ended stopping after a few seconds because it felt wrong.

But regardless These whores must atleast realize that they are sexually arousing young underaged boy.

It is not indecent exposure to sport an erection and show off the bulge to the foids who are tempting you

Just argue in court that the erection was purely physiological, and you were just showing it off through your clothes to feel good about yourself (in a somehow not sexually gratifying way) or whatever foids say to justify dressing like bimbos and showing off their ass and boob bulges

This could be the next adaptation of first amendment auditing

 

[VλREN]

It is not indecent exposure to sport an erection and show off the bulge to the foids who are tempting you

Just argue in court that it was purely physiological, and you were just showing it off to feel good about yourself or whatever foids say to justify dressing like bimbos and showing off their ass and boob bulges

Too high inhibit

 

[Atavistic Autist]

Too high inhibit

This reminds me of the man who tried to rape a woman in public, but couldn't sustain his erection due to anxiety. He had to flee the scene!

Brutal.

 

[Doesitmatter?]

Adds point to my thread

Every problem could be solved if women had the same sexual urges towards men that men have towards them.

If the retarded god or whatever it is, made the both gender equality sexually attracted to each other, the world would be euphoria. Imagine girls being so down bad for sex that they resort to fucking sub 5s like we do,life would be so much better

incels.is

 

[VλREN]

This reminds me of the man who tried to rape a woman, but couldn't sustain the erection due to anxiety. He had to flee the scene!

Brutal.

That probably happens a lot

The most most rapey I gotten was when I would trick my milf teachers into bending down so I could stare directly their cleavage.

I remember I had one busty teacher I had a crush on, she would dress super modest but one day she was wearing a shirt that was super loose. So I waited and stayed after class to trick her into bending down by getting her look into my backpack for some homework assignments.

I remember seeing her entire bra and belly button, I remember the adrenaline being super intense to the point I was shaking.

 

[Atavistic Autist]

That probably happens a lot

The most most rapey I gotten was when I would trick my milf teachers into bending down so I could stare directly their cleavage.

I remember I had one busty teacher I had a crush on, she would dress super modest but one day she was wearing a shirt that was super loose. So I waited and stayed after class to trick her into bending down by getting her look into my backpack for some homework assignments.

I remember seeing her entire bra and belly button, I remember the adrenaline being super intense to the point I was shaking.

I stare down foids without shame if they are dressed like sluts

Somehow they feel entitled to eschew shame for dressing like they do, and then pass that buck onto men who look at them, JFL

It should come with absolutely no shame to look at how they display themselves publicly. And that includes recording them!

Remember: what you can see in public, you are also legally entitled to record (in America)

No need to do it surreptitiously like in Asia

 

[copemaxx9002]

It is illegal to expose your nude body in public for sexual gratification, and a current area of law that is undeveloped in this regard concerns its application to the internet.

Given that social media platforms effectively constitute a public space, it stands to reason that when onlyfans thots post lewd pictures of themselves without the consent of the general public who will be viewing their posts (e.g., in the replies to trending twitter content), that this could be understood as indecent exposure.

All it would take is political and prosecutorial will for them to be criminally prosecuted under such statues.

At least in Britain, there is precedent and even specific laws that enable prosecution for "cyberflashing." But of course, this was a consequence of foids being sent dick pics by men



View attachment 1197699


However, these exact same standards could easily be applied to onlyfans thots who expose their nude bodies to men.

In America, a legal challenge to this would involve the question of free speech (given that pornography is technically considered "free speech"). And yet there are limits to where you can display pornography -- where it would be considered obscene. Namely, you cannot display it in public places, which is a designation that should include social media

Yet another legal challenge could come from the argument that Onlyfans thots aren't exposing themselves for "sexual gratification" at all, but just as a commercial venture (similarly protected by "muh free speech")

Evidence against this could include transcripts from the AI/paid chat flirters these Onlyfans thots employ to bait simps, which technically indicate sexual gratification as a motive for their conduct

Them having to defend against this would be reminiscent of Alex Jones having to argue in court that his whole show was just "for entertainment," and not serious. Which would be lulzy in itself, tbh

Fucking autistic no one cares what whores do only inkwells when they look in a girls general direction.

 

[Atavistic Autist]

Fucking autistic no one cares what whores do only inkwells when they look in a girls general direction.

Certainly not with that attitude!

The same legal protections that were made to protect women should also be enforced to protect men. This requires advocacy to achieve.

It's literally just using (((their))) own standards against (((them))). It requires no additional laws -- just an application of the "equal protections under the law" precept.

 

[Emba]

Good idea!

Solid case!

Consider it done!

However,

one must jump through legal hoops proving adulthood to view that shit...

All credit cards act as a type of money/id

 

[copemaxx9002]

Certainly not with that attitude!

The same legal protections that were made to protect women should also be enforced to protect men. This requires advocacy to achieve.

It's literally just using (((their))) own standards against (((them))). It requires no additional laws -- just an application of the "equal protections under the law" precept.

U post high IQ shit. But man women are never gonna be put to the same standards as men.

 

[Atavistic Autist]

U post high IQ shit. But man women are never gonna be put to the same standards as men.

Never socially, but jurisprudence is a very autistic enterprise

Inroads can indeed be made legally, so long as there's organizational force behind it