aren't Pakis inbred?
What does that have to do with the topic at hand
i dont know if i should trust their medical textbooks srs
You are srsly low iq
Have fun with a used wife and wanking to her getting plowed by the football team
JFL if you think incels have the option to choose between virgins and non-virgins, truecels will take anything. I couldn't care less if I manage to ascend with a foid who's had the entire football team inside her, just as long as she's an STD free looksmatch. Trad wife, trad life is a meme boyo
Now you just sound like a soyboy. A truecel man would kidnap a foid if it means a virgin waifu
Look up telegony
By the year 2040, all females of all ages will be sexhavers
fakecelening, of course a virgin wife is better but that is so unrealistic for incels. kidnapping is immoral srs. its piss
there are no virgin females at 18+
stop coping
stop coping
This is the first non-cucked medical book that I have seen.
i cant read that bro
Thats too much work just look at their age and that will tell you
This post needs to get stickied, seriously one of the best posts on this site and it barely has any words, this will be useful info for if I ever islammaxx so I can know if some whore is trying to trick me, saving this image
Morality is subjective, also as an incel, as far as society is concerned, your very existence is immoral, so why don't you do the moral thing and kill yourself then JFL. Any incel that is a moralfag is a fucking idiot.
If she’s legal age, she’s not a virgin.
Someone posted this on CuckQueers. Despite the scientific evidence being right in front of their eyes, they still pushed it away and said no.
Whats the name of the book?
Most philosophers would disagree with the notion that morality is subjective, regardless, I don't spend my time studying this so I won't argue with you about it. I personally don't have any radical beliefs so I highly doubt that society thinks my existence is immoral. Most people aren't going on about their day thinking about the immorality of internet virgins and since there's a large variance of belief among incels we cant all be classified as immoral when looked at individually.
Appeal to authority
Also you are pretty much asserting that they must be right by virtue of being philosophers
Anybody with common sense can see that morality is subjective, because it changes from era to era and place to place, there is no consistency, it changes on the whim of the state of mind of the people
I've always said this, but the only thing that defines "right" and "wrong" are a system of rewards and punishments, without those, right and wrong are practically indistinguishable in any OBJECTIVE way. Its the reason why religions have a "heaven" and "hell", its the reason why humans govern ourselves using "laws", where people who do something "wrong" get "fines" and "jail sentences".
Morality is subjective, so in order for it to make sense, we have to artificially make it objective, by creating a reward vs punishment system around morality
Take away all the technology, all the community, and put all humans back out into the wild, and tell me morality isn't subjective, in a century or two, everything that was once considered "immoral" will just be "everyday life"
Its weird that this needs to be explained to an incel, because female promiscuity for the most part is no longer considered immoral, but go back into the past and a woman could get stoned to death for it, morality is not objective, it never has been, and it never will be, its emotionally based in its nature, and emotional concepts are never objective.
If her age is isn't on the clock, she's probably taken Chad cock.
Moralfags are the most low IQ of incels. JFL at upholding morality when society doesn't have the morals to treat everyone like human beings irregardless of their appearance or social standing.
They are beta incels or larping cucks, i am a true incel gentleman and have to say this thread is based as fuck.
I think the most blackpilled incels are ogrecells because of hight T.
And yet retard soycucks and normies will say "She is below the age of consent, that means she has never had sex!"
Yeah because in the same way the government never lies to the people whom they govern, the people who are governed also follow every law at every time
Just because the age of consent is a particular number doesnt mean that people are adhering to it.
It's so paradoxical that the age of consent is meant to be the age at which someone is legally able to consent to sex, yet realistically most people (especially foids) have lost their virginity or even had sex multiple times by the time they reach the AOC which makes AOC as a law, ineffective and useless.
And yet retard soycucks and normies will say "She is below the age of consent, that means she has never had sex!"
Yeah because in the same way the government never lies to the people whom they govern, the people who are governed also follow every law at every time
Just because the age of consent is a particular number doesnt mean that people are adhering to it.
It's so paradoxical that the age of consent is meant to be the age at which someone is legally able to consent to sex, yet realistically most people (especially foids) have lost their virginity or even had sex multiple times by the time they reach the AOC which makes AOC as a law, ineffective and useless.
In europe the AOC is 14...
Yeah, that was an appeal to authority fallacy, my mistake. All I'm trying to say is that this subject is honestly too in depth for me to offer any response of value (which is why it's been up for debate for many years). Also, let me reword, I'm not saying that philosophers are correct just because they're philosophers. I'm just saying that I trust the position that morality is objective if it's the majority consensus in the world of philosophy, that doesn't mean they're automatically correct, I just go with the flow and trust them because I'm too lazy to study that field on my own. In my eyes, I think certain universal truth's will always remain regardless of changes in society, murder of an innocent for pleasure is objectively immoral.
Personally i think 14 is too young. AOC should be 16 worldwide, in every country. Unfortunately being attracted to a prime 16 year old developed virgin female makes you a pedophile according to obese, short-haired, masculine, 30+ years of age foid feminists in the west.
They start very young these days
This book is like the bible for determining a foids' status with regards to virginity. When a foid tells you "I'm a virgin. My age is below the AOC so i've had never had sex because im a good girl who follows the law, teehee!" instead of believing them and taking their word for it (when realistically they've already been fucked a few times), you can actually medically determine if they are telling the truth if you ever get the opportunity to examine her genitalia.
Last edited:
There's such a thing as hymen recovery surgery, sadly. It's very popular among muslim women in the west who want to trick their betabuxxers into thinking they are pure virgin angels.
It wont work as the breasts have changed from a round stiff shape to saggy
Srsly read the image and stop being a cuck
There are 18+ virgins you guys are just stick in your own shit.. the west
people here saying 18 is the cutoff when foidz are fucking as early as 12 and 13 JFL
Foids start fucking at 12. They're degenerate whores. Thanks (((media)))
by "virgin" do you mean nothing sexual at all or just blowjobs and anal but no p in v? arab girls love those loopholes
Lifefuel tbh. Finally I know this crucial knowledge
I was thinking about this but no clue tbh
no foid is truly pure virgin if you think about it
they maybe not fuck from 13 but they sure suck a dick from that age
femcels dont exist
Well if gender segregation is applied and absolutely no contact between thr sexes non virginity will be the odd sight
I always use this analogy to distinguish logic (truth) from morality
Logic/Truth is stating that 1+2=3
Morality is contemplating whether 2 consented to being added to 1 and how that process mentally affected it
Morality is contemplating whether 3 is content with the nature of its origins, or even wants to exist
Logic (objective) is merely stating a fact
Morality (subjective) is ascribing intangible (exists only in our minds) human concepts onto facts of reality and assessing whether certain acts can or cannot be committed based on those concepts
Killing for pleasure is not objectively immoral, that is not a "universal truth", you just want it to be, because that makes you feel "safer", it gives you a sense of "order" rather than the stressful feeling of a "chaotic" existence
Morality is subjective, ask yourself this, who decides what is the objective moral standard?, ironically your answer to that will be another appeal, an appeal to majority, well what if you woke up tomorrow and the majority of people were sadistic murderers, would you now be objectively wrong for thinking that murder for pleasure is immoral?
I'll never get incels who subscribe to morality period, I care nothing for it, its a shackle that holds people back, and people like us who already at the bottom of the totem pole can't afford to hold such restrictions, were already handicapped, everyone is already against us, if you want to come out on top in this world, if you want to carve out a little slice of heaven for yourself in this life, you'll have to abandon morality and ego, so long as you cling to those concepts, you'll never be open minded enough to do the things necessary to make you successful
Last edited:
This book actually has useful information for once. This was good to see
most are. But at least they are based on foids I guess
Labia sounds like a Demon tbh tbh tbh.
Very based ngl. This science needs to be taken back to the west.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
