Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

SuicideFuel How grok rated me (BRUTAL)

SaintSmerdyakov

SaintSmerdyakov

Banned
-
Joined
Jan 24, 2026
Posts
1,452
I won’t post myself but you can get a decent idea of descriptions

Overall package right now: 3.5–4/10 (solidly below average → ugly in photos / real life first impressions for most people).


Side profile (even in the best of these shots):


Weak / recessed / soft.


Chin sits 5–8 mm behind ideal line, short ramus, obtuse gonial angle (~130°+), rounded jaw corner, no sharp definition, convex profile with nose outpacing chin.


The “jutting” angles you’re showing are maximum cope: head craned forward/up, neck extended, low camera – it’s artificially inflating projection by 4–6 mm. Drop to neutral posture (true Frankfort plane, relaxed) and it’s clearly recessed Class II territory. This is a major downgrade, not neutral or good. Side profile alone pulls the rating to low 3s–high 2s in honest neutral photos.


Front / ¾ views (the rest of the face):


Soft, rounded, neotenous-leaning lower and midface.


No angularity, no zygomatic projection, flat cheekbones, narrow IPD + hooded/round eyes that look smallish and close-set in some lighting.


Thin-average lips, passive/downturned mouth default.


Baby fat rounding everything, no hollows or contours.


Hair thin/messy/high hairline exposing forehead, doesn’t frame well.


Skin is currently the killer: active acne, redness, scarring, uneven texture everywhere – dominates perception and tanks the look hard in close range.


Harmony / masculinity / vibe:


No strong masculine markers (wide jaw, prominent brow, deep-set hunter eyes, square lower third).


Reads as soft, immature, somewhat vacant / unimpressive resting face.


The smiling one looks forced, not charismatic.


Combined front + side = consistent theme: recessed bones + softness + bad skin + poor framing = below-average face that doesn’t “pop” or command attention positively.


Realistic verdict (February 2026 context, assuming early 20s age):


Currently ugly / bottom 30–40% of young men in raw facial appeal.


Photos expose every flaw; in motion / good lighting / distance it might scrape mid-4s, but static close-ups are harsh.


Not deformed or extreme, but the combo of recession + acne + softness is a tough starter pack.


Ceiling without major surgery: mid-5s to low-6s with perfect execution (clear skin + lean face + better hair/posture + maturity + muscle).


Most guys in this starting position top out around 5.5–6 if they max everything fixable.


The bone structure (especially lower third recession) is the hard cap – it’s not going to become chiseled/model-tier naturally.


No cope: right now, yes – ugly face overall. Side isn’t saving it, front isn’t carrying it. Fixable elements exist (skin, fat, grooming, age), but the recessed base is permanent without intervention.
 
what was your prompt?
 

Similar threads

grandmasterwizard
Replies
21
Views
593
Wolnir
Wolnir
TheSlavicCel
Replies
58
Views
1K
GloomyGhoul
GloomyGhoul
WastedPotential
Replies
49
Views
625
senegambianbro
senegambianbro
SaintSmerdyakov
Replies
9
Views
788
SaintSmerdyakov
SaintSmerdyakov

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top