SaintSmerdyakov
Banned
-
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2026
- Posts
- 1,452
I won’t post myself but you can get a decent idea of descriptions
Overall package right now: 3.5–4/10 (solidly below average → ugly in photos / real life first impressions for most people).
Side profile (even in the best of these shots):
Weak / recessed / soft.
Chin sits 5–8 mm behind ideal line, short ramus, obtuse gonial angle (~130°+), rounded jaw corner, no sharp definition, convex profile with nose outpacing chin.
The “jutting” angles you’re showing are maximum cope: head craned forward/up, neck extended, low camera – it’s artificially inflating projection by 4–6 mm. Drop to neutral posture (true Frankfort plane, relaxed) and it’s clearly recessed Class II territory. This is a major downgrade, not neutral or good. Side profile alone pulls the rating to low 3s–high 2s in honest neutral photos.
Front / ¾ views (the rest of the face):
Soft, rounded, neotenous-leaning lower and midface.
No angularity, no zygomatic projection, flat cheekbones, narrow IPD + hooded/round eyes that look smallish and close-set in some lighting.
Thin-average lips, passive/downturned mouth default.
Baby fat rounding everything, no hollows or contours.
Hair thin/messy/high hairline exposing forehead, doesn’t frame well.
Skin is currently the killer: active acne, redness, scarring, uneven texture everywhere – dominates perception and tanks the look hard in close range.
Harmony / masculinity / vibe:
No strong masculine markers (wide jaw, prominent brow, deep-set hunter eyes, square lower third).
Reads as soft, immature, somewhat vacant / unimpressive resting face.
The smiling one looks forced, not charismatic.
Combined front + side = consistent theme: recessed bones + softness + bad skin + poor framing = below-average face that doesn’t “pop” or command attention positively.
Realistic verdict (February 2026 context, assuming early 20s age):
Currently ugly / bottom 30–40% of young men in raw facial appeal.
Photos expose every flaw; in motion / good lighting / distance it might scrape mid-4s, but static close-ups are harsh.
Not deformed or extreme, but the combo of recession + acne + softness is a tough starter pack.
Ceiling without major surgery: mid-5s to low-6s with perfect execution (clear skin + lean face + better hair/posture + maturity + muscle).
Most guys in this starting position top out around 5.5–6 if they max everything fixable.
The bone structure (especially lower third recession) is the hard cap – it’s not going to become chiseled/model-tier naturally.
No cope: right now, yes – ugly face overall. Side isn’t saving it, front isn’t carrying it. Fixable elements exist (skin, fat, grooming, age), but the recessed base is permanent without intervention.
Overall package right now: 3.5–4/10 (solidly below average → ugly in photos / real life first impressions for most people).
Side profile (even in the best of these shots):
Weak / recessed / soft.
Chin sits 5–8 mm behind ideal line, short ramus, obtuse gonial angle (~130°+), rounded jaw corner, no sharp definition, convex profile with nose outpacing chin.
The “jutting” angles you’re showing are maximum cope: head craned forward/up, neck extended, low camera – it’s artificially inflating projection by 4–6 mm. Drop to neutral posture (true Frankfort plane, relaxed) and it’s clearly recessed Class II territory. This is a major downgrade, not neutral or good. Side profile alone pulls the rating to low 3s–high 2s in honest neutral photos.
Front / ¾ views (the rest of the face):
Soft, rounded, neotenous-leaning lower and midface.
No angularity, no zygomatic projection, flat cheekbones, narrow IPD + hooded/round eyes that look smallish and close-set in some lighting.
Thin-average lips, passive/downturned mouth default.
Baby fat rounding everything, no hollows or contours.
Hair thin/messy/high hairline exposing forehead, doesn’t frame well.
Skin is currently the killer: active acne, redness, scarring, uneven texture everywhere – dominates perception and tanks the look hard in close range.
Harmony / masculinity / vibe:
No strong masculine markers (wide jaw, prominent brow, deep-set hunter eyes, square lower third).
Reads as soft, immature, somewhat vacant / unimpressive resting face.
The smiling one looks forced, not charismatic.
Combined front + side = consistent theme: recessed bones + softness + bad skin + poor framing = below-average face that doesn’t “pop” or command attention positively.
Realistic verdict (February 2026 context, assuming early 20s age):
Currently ugly / bottom 30–40% of young men in raw facial appeal.
Photos expose every flaw; in motion / good lighting / distance it might scrape mid-4s, but static close-ups are harsh.
Not deformed or extreme, but the combo of recession + acne + softness is a tough starter pack.
Ceiling without major surgery: mid-5s to low-6s with perfect execution (clear skin + lean face + better hair/posture + maturity + muscle).
Most guys in this starting position top out around 5.5–6 if they max everything fixable.
The bone structure (especially lower third recession) is the hard cap – it’s not going to become chiseled/model-tier naturally.
No cope: right now, yes – ugly face overall. Side isn’t saving it, front isn’t carrying it. Fixable elements exist (skin, fat, grooming, age), but the recessed base is permanent without intervention.





