Obviously we incels complain about being generalized by society (which I see as fair), but cucktears quickly responds saying that we generalize all women as wanting Chad, so we're apparently hypocritical.
Serious How do you respond to this counter argument of cucktears?
It's true they want and chase chad, on the other hand only 0.001% of incels are violent, so they are over generalizing.
It's not that women do want Chad. Is that we haven't seen nor felt in personal, direct terms one choosing us, even when we do appropiately behave. And this world is about watch to believe.
All straight women want Chad. Most realize he's out of their league except for maybe a brief ONS if they get lucky and so settle for something less. But if Chad makes his interest known to pretty much any heterosexual or bisexual (and maybe even lesbian) woman, particularly if he also has money to go with his looks, and I can guarantee that 99.99% of women are kicking their 4/5/6/7 cucklet into touch without a second thought. Foids being foids, they will for sure come up with some bullshit about how their relationship hadn't been working for a while etc but human instinct is to mate with as close to a 10 as you can get. If a 10 comes along, nothing will deter the female from mating with him.
It's true that they want Chad. This belief is based on a plethora of evidence.
Only virgin women can claim that they don't need Chad.
Non-virgin women already fell for Chad and lost their virginities to him.
Non-virgin women already fell for Chad and lost their virginities to him.
99% of women want chad
.00000000000000000001% of incels are violent
i dont see a problem with genalising by majority
.00000000000000000001% of incels are violent
i dont see a problem with genalising by majority
Attempting to defend yourself or "incels" is a losing cause. Defending an attack implicitly validates it in the minds of bystanders. The biggest threat to people like cucktears is that communities like this exist at all. Given disillusioned men forums where our ideas are allowed to exist is the biggest threat imaginable to these people. They know that we will grow while they will slowly wither. Eventually, there will be more of us than can be gang harassed online without serious repercussions coming back towards them.
This.
You can't. They ban you for counter arguments.
The way society generalize us is a social construct, since most of us don't even have obvious "subhuman" features on our face. The way they reject us is merely a play of "social validation" on social media rather than an inconscious genetic selection (in most case, not all cases of course).
The fact that women are attracted to Chad is an inherited natural behavior of genetic selection. Those who claim not to be physically attracted to Chad are just lying, or may present a genetic deficiency themselves.
So the first is indeed abusive generalization while the second is just animal pshychology.
The fact that women are attracted to Chad is an inherited natural behavior of genetic selection. Those who claim not to be physically attracted to Chad are just lying, or may present a genetic deficiency themselves.
So the first is indeed abusive generalization while the second is just animal pshychology.
This is real easy. Unlike cucktears, let's actually look at the stats.
Due to being male virgins, incels are statistically the least likely to be dangerous: https://omegavirginrevolt.wordpress...ot-lead-to-murder-or-other-criminal-behavior/
On the other hand, blackpills (like the ones from okcupid) have exposed women as desiring only the top males: https://archive.fo/489UV
Also look at any research done on why women love tall men. The conclusion is always that women want what they perceive to be the top percentage of men.
Generalizing isn't bad on its own. It's what we base than generalization on that matters. Due to the halo effect and confirmation bias, all it takes is one criminal incel for the masses to slander us. On the other hand, we have gathered tons of research on how women tend to behave.
Due to being male virgins, incels are statistically the least likely to be dangerous: https://omegavirginrevolt.wordpress...ot-lead-to-murder-or-other-criminal-behavior/
On the other hand, blackpills (like the ones from okcupid) have exposed women as desiring only the top males: https://archive.fo/489UV
Also look at any research done on why women love tall men. The conclusion is always that women want what they perceive to be the top percentage of men.
Generalizing isn't bad on its own. It's what we base than generalization on that matters. Due to the halo effect and confirmation bias, all it takes is one criminal incel for the masses to slander us. On the other hand, we have gathered tons of research on how women tend to behave.
We have actual evidence and studies. They have useless word-of-mouth anecdotes.
They're flat earthers basically.
They're flat earthers basically.
One thing you can guarantee - every single poster on IT is making do. There's not one 9 or 10 Chad/Stacy there. Probably very few sub-5s either. For the average normoid, life is about making do. Every IT poster is an average normoid/cucklet. You can't afford a Lamborghini or a mansion, so you drive decade old Ford and live in an apartment. You can't get a 9 or 10 Chad/Stacy, so you lower your sights till you find a looksmatch. But written into the DNA of every human, just like every animal, is the desire to mate with the best the species has to offer.
By posting their endless mocking and faux shocked twaddle on IT, the users are desperately attempting to validate their own unsatisfying existence. 5s, 6s, 7s shacked up with 5s, 6s, 7s. They want more but know they can't attain that so denigrate those (even) less fortunate whilst fervently attempting to delude themselves that they're very happy with their life of tedious going-through-the-motions sex with someone they never felt attracted to in the first place. Going to their boring workplace where they are 'respected' (ie, not everyone hates them) and doing drone jobs to make some fat parasite rich. Incels are the perfect target for people of this type - because they see them as lower down the pecking order and thus are a prime target upon whom to take out their frustrations at not living the life they desire but can never have. This is bullying plain and simple, however they might want to dress it up.
By posting their endless mocking and faux shocked twaddle on IT, the users are desperately attempting to validate their own unsatisfying existence. 5s, 6s, 7s shacked up with 5s, 6s, 7s. They want more but know they can't attain that so denigrate those (even) less fortunate whilst fervently attempting to delude themselves that they're very happy with their life of tedious going-through-the-motions sex with someone they never felt attracted to in the first place. Going to their boring workplace where they are 'respected' (ie, not everyone hates them) and doing drone jobs to make some fat parasite rich. Incels are the perfect target for people of this type - because they see them as lower down the pecking order and thus are a prime target upon whom to take out their frustrations at not living the life they desire but can never have. This is bullying plain and simple, however they might want to dress it up.
Their generalization is based off the actions of one or two people. Our generalization is based off the actions of thousands of women, which makes our predictions a hell of a lot more probable.
tbh our observations are also pretty futile, most women find only 1-2% of men attractive, IF even that. however, based on tinder experiments and such where we use "chads," it's the truth. women go fucking insane for looks. the higher the looks level, the less personality begins to matter, although i'm not an autist who thinks personality quite literally does not matter, that's retarded.
however, their observations are much more retarded, because first of all, that neckbeard meme that they have going on? i have literally never seen anyone here even fit that stereotype or phenotype, meanwhile every second male person on inceltears looks like that. they generalize that all incels are misogynists and violent. sure, misogynists, but violent? the 1 single person low inhib and crazy enough to go on a killing spree? that's like 0.000001% of incels. meanwhile pretty much all women want "chad," and adjust their personalities accordingly whenever they're talking to chad.
however, their observations are much more retarded, because first of all, that neckbeard meme that they have going on? i have literally never seen anyone here even fit that stereotype or phenotype, meanwhile every second male person on inceltears looks like that. they generalize that all incels are misogynists and violent. sure, misogynists, but violent? the 1 single person low inhib and crazy enough to go on a killing spree? that's like 0.000001% of incels. meanwhile pretty much all women want "chad," and adjust their personalities accordingly whenever they're talking to chad.
D
Women who are ugly can’t attract high value men, so they have to date down and seek uglier males. If a Chad were attracted to her for some reason and interfered with their relationship, the ugly woman would rush towards Chad in a heartbeat.
R
Check the thread I posted https://medium.com/@worstonlinedate...ably-better-off-not-wasting-your-2ddf370a6e9a
It's literally proven that the top 20% of men get the top 80% of women
It's literally proven that the top 20% of men get the top 80% of women
Exactly
The only 'normies' that fear and despise incels are those that are responsible for treating less attractive, isolated men like shit. They are creating their killers, they know it and they are shitting themselves. Of course they will always try the oldest tactic of blame shifting. Its the easiest trick Narcissists and other toxic, emotionally immature, sociopathic normies use to abuse victims. While it may be theoretically possible to dominate another person without using blame, such as in a prison, a warzone, in a domestic relationship, blame shifting is essential to both implement and disguise power and control.
Why are average guys struggling like never before? How come less than half of males have ever reproduced in history as opposed to the vast majority of females? The idea of a “hot” guy seems universal to many women but all different kinds of women are portrayed as “hot”, why is that?
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
