Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

It's Over How Couples Met 1930 - 2024

Incel_Doomer

Incel_Doomer

Veteran
★★★
Joined
Feb 13, 2023
Posts
1,247


In case you just landed on Earth five minutes ago, (IRL) social networks and the dating market are in ruins like Dresden in 1945. If you are male, and you aren't great looking, socially successful and NT (as documented in your online profile and social media presence), you have become as useless as a mechanical typewriter.

With instant communication and rapid transport foids have access to every Chad within a radius as far as they're prepared to travel. Ten miles? Twenty? Fifty? More? With the breakdown of traditional hierarchical morality, female emancipation, contraception, abortion, equality laws and the welfare state, there are no negative consequences for taking as many Chad cocks in every hole as they want.

If you aren't top tier Chad, do not approach a foid in person as at best you will have no chance of success and just get a gentle rejection. Increasingly, doing so will have negative social/legal consequences for you, apart from the psychological damage. Nuclear rejection, persecution, being kicked out of and banned from the gym/church/university, police involvement, White Knight attack etc.

The only thing you can really do is GYOW and concentrate on areas of your life you can have success in. Unless you want to be a subhuman beta provider for a late 30s single mother, who's had sex with 175 men of all races and multiple women and dogs and now wants to 'settle down'. Of course you will get treated degradingly, cucked and divorced, then fucked by the court and everyone will believe her lies and take her side. Still that's probably the only access most males of coming generations will have to females, other than prostitutes of course. And even that is probably achieved through the internet now, so you're still one of a swarm of sperm surrounding the egg and will probably get nothing, or something far beneath your level.
 
So youre saying for me to ascend in college I would have to at least be in the 0.7%
 
60% of couples met online but Tinder isnt real life? Wow thats crazy
 
So youre saying for me to ascend in college I would have to at least be in the 0.7%
This is about relationships, but I already talked about College in 2024 in another Post.

Todays College is NOT a party/fuck fest as people think. It comes from a bias of old College Chads of the Gen X and Millenial era.

Especially as a man you WILL be lonely in college.

College connections are proven to hold less often then Highschool relationships.
 
BTW for those that are asking where "Random locations" are - cold approches have a less then 0.5% chance of working.

So even a good looking guy has barely a chance to get to meet a girl from a random encounter.

Statistically you will get a date in 1 out of 200 women that you approch and in most cases these studied have been done by MTN to HTN.
 
So youre saying for me to ascend in college I would have to at least be in the 0.7%
I don't know what the exact number is, for the population as a whole, but it's more than that. Somewhere between 10 and 20 maybe? University is probably the easiest time of your life to get sex.
 
BTW for those that are asking where "Random locations" are - cold approches have a less then 0.5% chance of working.

So even a good looking guy has barely a chance to get to meet a girl from a random encounter.

Statistically you will get a date in 1 out of 200 women that you approch and in most cases these studied have been done by MTN to HTN.
Yep tried it and learned the hard way. I was in my PUAcope phase and thought just had to be low inhib to get girls.
 
And now you aren't socially allowed to meet chicks anywhere, because 'muh "harassment", thanks feminism.
 
It is very much over, extremely over, in fact
 
No internet presence = over for you
 
so the pretty much the only way to meet foids is from dating apps which I get ZERO matches on? its over :cryfeels:
 
I don't know what the exact number is, for the population as a whole, but it's more than that. Somewhere between 10 and 20 maybe? University is probably the easiest time of your life to get sex.
It depends. If you get into a male-dominant field like any of STEM, then good luck... that's my fate and I can already see myself in the middle of a sausage fest in the inevitable future, in front of my mental eyes.
 
For the minority of normies who do manage to score a female partner, it’s very probable they will be cucked in some type of way during the partnership (cheated on, used for betabux, inconsistent access to sex etc.)

There is data that suggests the vast majority of zoomer relationships involve cheating by at least one of the partners involved. So most zoomer males are single, and the minority of zoomer males that aren’t single are likely to have been cucked during relationship


As OP said, the average male’s best chance at having regular contact with the other sex (without running Juggernaut Law on sub5 foids) is: (a) become a consistent escortbuxer using neetbux or wagiebux, or (b) become a future betabuxer / oofy doofy for a post-wall roastie that's been ran through by over dozen cocks including at least one cock from a non-human animal and finally decides to "settle down" with you

It seems the majority of zoomer males really are screwed. I’m pretty sure that alpha males will meet the same fate when they come of age within the next 10 years. It's probably true that online social media has more or less ruined the dynamic of heterosexual partnerships for most young men in Gen Z. An inevitable consequence of technological advancement alongside the effects of liberal feminism. All of this could have been avoided if online social media never evolved to the stage where pictures and videos could be digitally shared en masse
 
Last edited:
Thats complete bullshit. People meet through friends not online. The “study” was probably funded by (((match.com))) and its affiliates.
 
Thats complete bullshit. People meet through friends not online. The “study” was probably funded by (((match.com))) and its affiliates.

you think so??
i know datings app struggling now since normie/beta/cucks dont want to continue wasting time
 
You summed it up well. This world got crazy for the average guy, everything is so stacked against us.
 
Thats complete bullshit. People meet through friends not online. The “study” was probably funded by (((match.com))) and its affiliates.

Yeah that was my first thought. There's zero chance that the number is THAT high for people who meet online. I literally don't know anyone who got a wife or gf through "online" means. It's all through their friend circle, through church, or it was someone they met in school/college.
 
Thats complete bullshit. People meet through friends not online. The “study” was probably funded by (((match.com))) and its affiliates.
Exactly. I think friends, work, bars, family in that order.
 

Similar threads

mcmental
Replies
20
Views
711
Grodd
Grodd
Pikacel
Replies
13
Views
368
D. B. Gooner
D. B. Gooner
Clownworldcell
Replies
21
Views
1K
LeFrenchCel
LeFrenchCel
FoidsEnshittifyAll
Replies
34
Views
859
Izayacel
Izayacel
FastBlast
Replies
25
Views
2K
jo_yugislayer08
jo_yugislayer08

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top