Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Theory Higher iq country = more cucked and enslaved

ANTAGONIST

ANTAGONIST

KHHDV+ | ⊘♀ Antifeminist |
★★
Joined
Jan 4, 2026
Posts
4,665
Online time
3d 10h
Highest iq people are east asians apparently and they are the most enslaved and cucked people to exist. In japan, they dedicate their life to serving some stupid companies and work all day and night. In China, they have a totalitarian government and philosophies that tell them to be obedient and bla bla blah. In Korea, they are extremely cucked, foids have all the power. Singapore is the same, a clean corporate hellhole. Notice how there are no resistance movements or unique groups in any of those places. There are no chinese punk people or anything, at least as far as we know. Nothing really original has come out of any of those places in the last decades. They never question anything.

Same is true for the high iq european countries. Germans for example are obedient goyslaves. The scandinavians also. They never question the dominant narrative. They avoid confrontation and conflict. They keep quiet. They trust the government and mainstream media without any doubts.

The lower the iq is the more active and self-willed people will be. In low iq jungle countries they eat natural foods and get enough sunlight. People in the slums of mumbai have their looksmatch as an arranged marriage. Ugly somali aliens get to creampie virgin pussy. Meanwhile, in civilized countries, men are doing suicides on a massive scale. In the turd world, people hold their life as their most important possesion, in the west, people view life as "suffering".
 
Jews are highest iq and most dominant.
 
It has less to do with IQ, and more to do with progressivist ideologies; western countries have been subverted by nonsensical interpretations of egalitarianism, as well as high levels of individualistic sentiment, weak communal structures, and undermined religion. It's expectedly difficult to keep your society from getting socially cucked if it has no sociological backbone, and if everyone is lobotomized by different forms of media.
 
It has less to do with IQ, and more to do with progressivist ideologies; western countries have been subverted by nonsensical interpretations of egalitarianism, as well as high levels of individualistic sentiment, weak communal structures, and undermined religion. It's expectedly difficult to keep your society from getting socially cucked if it has no sociological backbone, and if everyone is lobotomized by different forms of media.
Chinese are kind of collectivist, but they always seemed to have a slave mindset. Collectivism is acrually more slave-minded, realistically speaking, but i don't think it has much do to with it. Egalitarianism and individualism seem kind of at odds with each other, one is about caring for others while the other is about caring about yourself. I don't think people even think about any philosophies to base their life around, they just go with the flow and precisely, this IS what makes them SLAVE minded.

They (the high iq people, chinks, euros etc) can control their nature more because they have a higher iq. Low iq niggers follow their NATURAL instincts, which prevents them from achieving "civilization" (unnatural living)
 
Disagree, jungle blacks have it worse

1777064203866
 
Depends what you mean by "enslaved". By all measures, whites, East Asians, and other high-income people are the most satisfied with their lives and have the most agency in choosing what they want their lives to be. They can have everything you've mentioned third worlders having, in addition to taking for granted a crapload of things thirdworlders can't afford.

1777063407287
w=1350
w=1350


There is no advantage to being from a poor and low-IQ country. Whites, Gulf Arabs and East Asians can freely enjoy life travelling around the world thanks to strong passports and high incomes. If they aren't satisfied, they can simply move around the planet, all the while having safe countries with well-functioning healthcare systems to return to whenever they wish, while thirdworlders are mostly stuck wherever they are born, in whatever circumstances they find themselves in.

In japan, they dedicate their life to serving some stupid companies and work all day and night. In China, they have a totalitarian government and philosophies that tell them to be obedient and bla bla blah. In Korea, they are extremely cucked, foids have all the power. Singapore is the same, a clean corporate hellhole.
Apart from China, all of those countries have a much lower workplace fatality rates than the third world, along with much shorter working hours. Japan is apparently even below OECD average when it comes to hours worked per person. It's third worlders who are losing lives to their employers.

Arinitie_PR_04_V2_4_MP_adca2a6bb4.png
Annual-Working-Hours_Main.jpg



Looking at it this way, it makes sense why third worlders are lonelier than people in richer places:feelswhere:.


Meanwhile, in civilized countries, men are doing suicides on a massive scale. In the turd world, people hold their life as their most important possesion, in the west, people view life as "suffering".
Turd worlders dominate suicide rates globally.

1755365723609-png.1523078
1777063175324


The only developed country that has similar suicide rates South Korea, which is an exception to the rule (and Russia if you consider it to be developed). Japan already has Western-tier suicide rates.
 
Chinese are kind of collectivist, but they always seemed to have a slave mindset.
There has been a demonstrable increase in individualism in China as well.

Collectivism is acrually more slave-minded, realistically speaking, but i don't think it has much do to with it. Egalitarianism and individualism seem kind of at odds with each other, one is about caring for others while the other is about caring about yourself. I don't think people even think about any philosophies to base their life around, they just go with the flow and precisely, this IS what makes them SLAVE minded.
I wouldn't say that egalitarianism and individualism are necessarily at odds, as there isn’t a real binary opposition. Egalitarianism is about how resources, rights, and status are distributed. Individualism is about where moral priority is placed (individual vs group). You can have egalitarian individualist systems (liberal democracies) and hierarchical collectivist ones (corporatism for example). I do agree that superficially, collectivism may appear more aligned with what one would call slave-minded, but the issue is that this is heavily contingent upon the manner in which individualism manifests itself; you could have a respectable ideal for it that calls for embarking upon a path of self-mastery, which is positive if done correctly.

The issue is, however, individualism typically manifests as the contemporary hyper-individualistic type, rather than the meaningful, moral, and virtuous path that would involve a better understanding of the "self." I personally disagree with this form of individualism as well, since the self is as shallow as a puddle of urine, but that is mostly tangential to my point here — which is that, at the very least, the ideal form of individualism sets its sights upon a respectable end goal in theory. This is different from the aforementioned superficial individualism which commonly emerges in the form of hedonism, consumerism, and an endless sprint on the hedonic treadmill, as well as disregard for the wellbeing of others in favor of self-furtherance and indulgence. One may argue this is the inevitable conclusion of individualism in general, but this is a different point.

Egalitarianism itself is also a major issue here since the modern notion of it is flawed, and misunderstands the concept of complementarity; these egalitarian ideas that are common in modern liberal contexts are a detrimental ailment to these societies, as they do not even aim for a fair form of equality in many cases.

And yes, most people don't consciously deliberate these philosophies, but their ideas underpin their entire lives. All societies have default pathways that most people follow because humans are habitual, socially influenced, and constrained by economics and institutions.
 
Disagree, jungle blacks have it worse

View attachment 1716103
I remember watching some Zimbabwean youtuber's video where he was explaining the working experiences there. Apparently, it's not at all uncommon for workers who go to work by bus to make exactly as much money as they need to pay for there fare there and back, and some bit of food so they don't starve, basically losing all of their money just to basic survival and the ability to continue doing so:society:.

It's wild how ignored the utter shittiness of a lot of the planet is, just because people are completely unfamiliar with those places, comparing them to the rest of the world feels unfair, and, frankly, because the people there just don't have the power to share how shitty their lives are (no media with global reach, etc.)
 
Depends what you mean by "enslaved". By all measures, whites, East Asians, and other high-income people are the most satisfied with their lives and have the most agency in choosing what they want their lives to be. They can have everything you've mentioned third worlders having, in addition to taking for granted a crapload of things thirdworlders can't afford.

View attachment 1716093
w=1350
w=1350


There is no advantage to being from a poor and low-IQ country. Whites, Gulf Arabs and East Asians can freely enjoy life travelling around the world thanks to strong passports and high incomes. If they aren't satisfied, they can simply move around the planet, all the while having safe countries with well-functioning healthcare systems to return to whenever they wish, while thirdworlders are mostly stuck wherever they are born, in whatever circumstances they find themselves in.


Apart from China, all of those countries have a much lower workplace fatality rates than the third world, along with much shorter working hours. Japan is apparently even below OECD average when it comes to hours worked per person. It's third worlders who are losing lives to their employers.

Arinitie_PR_04_V2_4_MP_adca2a6bb4.png
Annual-Working-Hours_Main.jpg



Looking at it this way, it makes sense why third worlders are lonelier than people in richer places:feelswhere:.



Turd worlders dominate suicide rates globally.

1755365723609-png.1523078
View attachment 1716091

The only developed country that has similar suicide rates South Korea, which is an exception to the rule (and Russia if you consider it to be developed). Japan already has Western-tier suicide rates.
I am surprised to see Israel so high.
 
I remember watching some Zimbabwean youtuber's video where he was explaining the working experiences there. Apparently, it's not at all uncommon for workers who go to work by bus to make exactly as much money as they need to pay for there fare there and back, and some bit of food so they don't starve, basically losing all of their money just to basic survival and the ability to continue doing so:society:.
What the fuck

Why does he even work
 
I remember watching some Zimbabwean youtuber's video where he was explaining the working experiences there. Apparently, it's not at all uncommon for workers who go to work by bus to make exactly as much money as they need to pay for there fare there and back, and some bit of food so they don't starve, basically losing all of their money just to basic survival and the ability to continue doing so:society:.

It's wild how ignored the utter shittiness of a lot of the planet is, just because people are completely unfamiliar with those places, comparing them to the rest of the world feels unfair, and, frankly, because the people there just don't have the power to share how shitty their lives are (no media with global reach, etc.)
That's brutal :feelsbadman:
 
I am surprised to see Israel so high.
They are disliked internationally a lot, so its citizens have to take that into account when travelling abroad, but apart from that, I don't think they have any more to complain about than other high-income developed countries + they are the only industrialized country with an above-replacement fertility rate (makes one wonder why that is:waitwhat::feelsjuice:).

What the fuck

Why does he even work
AFAIK, it was some young guy so I don't think he was working at all.
 
they aren't actually high iq then
 
Chinese are kind of collectivist, but they always seemed to have a slave mindset. Collectivism is acrually more slave-minded, realistically speaking, but i don't think it has much do to with it. Egalitarianism and individualism seem kind of at odds with each other, one is about caring for others while the other is about caring about yourself. I don't think people even think about any philosophies to base their life around, they just go with the flow and precisely, this IS what makes them SLAVE minded.

They (the high iq people, chinks, euros etc) can control their nature more because they have a higher iq. Low iq niggers follow their NATURAL instincts, which prevents them from achieving "civilization" (unnatural living)
but following your natural instincts is based


honestly though. i feel like serving society is instinct though? that way you can be part of society and being part of society entails being able to have mating rights. and mating is like the most instinctive thing ever

i don't think that rape is actually natural instinct of man. i think that simping is, and men simp by working hard and proving to foids they're worthy. anyway, i'm still trying to wrap my head around it, but i definitely don't think rape is the natural instinct

i do think that if men go to war, they will rape the enemy's women, but it's not the same because the women of the country they're attacking is the out group
 
Depends what you mean by "enslaved". By all measures, whites, East Asians, and other high-income people are the most satisfied with their lives and have the most agency in choosing what they want their lives to be. They can have everything you've mentioned third worlders having, in addition to taking for granted a crapload of things thirdworlders can't afford.

View attachment 1716093
w=1350
w=1350


There is no advantage to being from a poor and low-IQ country. Whites, Gulf Arabs and East Asians can freely enjoy life travelling around the world thanks to strong passports and high incomes. If they aren't satisfied, they can simply move around the planet, all the while having safe countries with well-functioning healthcare systems to return to whenever they wish, while thirdworlders are mostly stuck wherever they are born, in whatever circumstances they find themselves in.


Apart from China, all of those countries have a much lower workplace fatality rates than the third world, along with much shorter working hours. Japan is apparently even below OECD average when it comes to hours worked per person. It's third worlders who are losing lives to their employers.

Arinitie_PR_04_V2_4_MP_adca2a6bb4.png
Annual-Working-Hours_Main.jpg



Looking at it this way, it makes sense why third worlders are lonelier than people in richer places:feelswhere:.



Turd worlders dominate suicide rates globally.

1755365723609-png.1523078
View attachment 1716091

The only developed country that has similar suicide rates South Korea, which is an exception to the rule (and Russia if you consider it to be developed). Japan already has Western-tier suicide rates.
Considering how bad whites, East Asians, etc. still have it (or at the very least young, non-female, non-Chad members of both races), this just tells me the modern world as a whole is a mistake.

Makes sense why Goatis and his HG fetishism got so big. Tbh this world doesn’t need a gajatrillion people; maybe like 10 million (split mostly across whites and East Asians, with Polynesians, Kavkaz, and Native Americans each making up smaller minorities) people would be ideal, and all living nomadic pastoral, HG, or seafaring lifestyles. Civilization is overrated
 
Highest iq people are east asians apparently and they are the most enslaved and cucked people to exist. In japan, they dedicate their life to serving some stupid companies and work all day and night. In China, they have a totalitarian government and philosophies that tell them to be obedient and bla bla blah. In Korea, they are extremely cucked, foids have all the power. Singapore is the same, a clean corporate hellhole. Notice how there are no resistance movements or unique groups in any of those places. There are no chinese punk people or anything, at least as far as we know. Nothing really original has come out of any of those places in the last decades. They never question anything.

Same is true for the high iq european countries. Germans for example are obedient goyslaves. The scandinavians also. They never question the dominant narrative. They avoid confrontation and conflict. They keep quiet. They trust the government and mainstream media without any doubts.

The lower the iq is the more active and self-willed people will be. In low iq jungle countries they eat natural foods and get enough sunlight. People in the slums of mumbai have their looksmatch as an arranged marriage. Ugly somali aliens get to creampie virgin pussy. Meanwhile, in civilized countries, men are doing suicides on a massive scale. In the turd world, people hold their life as their most important possesion, in the west, people view life as "suffering".
South Korea situation is truly a hell
 
Considering how bad whites, East Asians, etc. still have it (or at the very least young, non-female, non-Chad members of both races), this just tells me the modern world as a whole is a mistake.

Makes sense why Goatis and his HG fetishism got so big. Tbh this world doesn’t need a gajatrillion people; maybe like 10 million (split mostly across whites and East Asians, with Polynesians, Kavkaz, and Native Americans each making up smaller minorities) people would be ideal, and all living nomadic pastoral, HG, or seafaring lifestyles. Civilization is overrated
What about niggers, sand niggers, pajeets, jungle gooks, chindians, wasians ( central Asians) and north ( east) Asians like mongols and Siberians
 
wasians ( central Asians) and north ( east) Asians like mongols and Siberians
I count Mongols and Siberians as East Asians. And yeah I’d add Kazakhs as another small minority alongisde Polys, Kavkaz, and Native Americans. The other Central Asian groups have high BMAC (MENA) admixture which is subhuman so they’re a no-go
 
I count Mongols and Siberians as East Asians. And yeah I’d add Kazakhs as another small minority alongisde Polys, Kavkaz, and Native Americans. The other Central Asian groups have high BMAC (MENA) admixture which is subhuman so they’re a no-go
I see

Jfl lol

Had to google Kavkaz

But yea, sounds pretty solid
 
The brainwashing is just more efficient. In these countries people go 12 years to school and then some to university. 12 years is enough to completely change someone.
 
The brainwashing is just more efficient. In these countries people go 12 years to school and then some to university. 12 years is enough to completely change someone.
Schooling is the foundation of this hell order, yet i have never seen any alternative political side attack it.
 
Highest iq people are east asians apparently and they are the most enslaved and cucked people to exist. In japan, they dedicate their life to serving some stupid companies and work all day and night. In China, they have a totalitarian government and philosophies that tell them to be obedient and bla bla blah. In Korea, they are extremely cucked, foids have all the power. Singapore is the same, a clean corporate hellhole. Notice how there are no resistance movements or unique groups in any of those places. There are no chinese punk people or anything, at least as far as we know. Nothing really original has come out of any of those places in the last decades. They never question anything.

Same is true for the high iq european countries. Germans for example are obedient goyslaves. The scandinavians also. They never question the dominant narrative. They avoid confrontation and conflict. They keep quiet. They trust the government and mainstream media without any doubts.

The lower the iq is the more active and self-willed people will be. In low iq jungle countries they eat natural foods and get enough sunlight. People in the slums of mumbai have their looksmatch as an arranged marriage. Ugly somali aliens get to creampie virgin pussy. Meanwhile, in civilized countries, men are doing suicides on a massive scale. In the turd world, people hold their life as their most important possesion, in the west, people view life as "suffering".
totalitarian government being listed as a bad thing geg
 
totalitarian government being listed as a bad thing geg
Have fun obeying orders and getting fucked by the government. You want some other men to dominate your life. Now that's cucked.
 
I feel like IQ equalling intelligence might be a myth because I believe Idiocracy is a myth. If you're not reproducing (excluding the involuntary childless), then I don't think you're intelligent. It's as simple as that. I feel like those who don't reproduce have a poor frontal lobe, which is responsible for planning. The voluntary childless are short sighted. They didn't make children, which are our future.
 
Last edited:
You are so horribly wrong lmao, obviously there are alot of subcultures in those countries. Thing is that once the post graduate life comes, theres nothing stopping those dudes from those countries from being a wageslave. Literally the same with the West and shits, straight corporate hell of life

Meaningless post
 

Similar threads

SEX NIGGA
Replies
25
Views
1K
Caichan
Caichan
DISASTER
Replies
111
Views
2K
DISASTER
DISASTER
mrlunatic
Replies
20
Views
981
UndeadDeadMan
UndeadDeadMan
hindercel
Replies
12
Views
416
hindercel
hindercel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top