First he uses Incel as movement self identification group, wrong. With main thing that bind us together misogyny, wrong again. He disregard lookism and external similarities between individuals that groups them together. By his logic if a cat identify as a dog and other dogs see him also as a dog then that cat is a dog, most of the low smv men lack the proper interaction with women, they same as us only have the online experience. Other low smv "not incels" men accept the master slave situation because as simps they get crumbs of pussy, he presume if we got crumbs of pussy we would stop identifying as an incels, very wrong.
Lets say for the sake of the argument blackpill itself is a misogyny and we chose it, he says we identify as blackpilled because of lack of interaction and socialisation with women, because we lack the reflection from women we dehumanise and hate them, same could be said for them, only characteristic they assign to us is misogyny, isn't that dehumanising? Im someone's son, brother, owner, uncle, cousin, not just misogynist (using the same argument as they do).