B
Did you consent? If not, you got raped by @SlayerSlayer's proof.
Serious Hey incels, we need to talk about consent, so listen to this TED talk
#metoo
I agree, I wouldn't want to complicate things further consent should be a simple yes or no, it only has issues if the other person cannot answer either cause she's drugged or something then, I wouldn't fuck her.
This. We are not in position to question consent.
its not legally safe to question consent
the problem with a simple "yes" or "no" is that women are insane, so binary concepts like "yes" or "no" mean nothing to such women, so you need a mathematical proof to justify that consent can be revoked at any second for any reason
the problem is that women are lazy cowards, so men have to be extra feminist and prove they have PhD understandings of consent to empower their fickle behavior
At that point you'll run into some bullshit paradox or something with those proofs or you'll be contradictory.
a paradox is rape my friend
If any non mod user posted this they would have gotten a warning btw.
that's correct, unless they added the word nigger faggot or cuck in their post, or if they have a known history of using those terms
Well if every girl I've ever met has consistently said no to me, then how the hell am I supposed to ascend?
Why post this though
Ngl the math take is kind of interesting. Is that in the video or something you derived?
why do this to yourself
Ngl the math take is kind of interesting. Is that in the video or something you derived?
the axioms are technically in the video but even as the foid is explaining these concepts, it's a bit wishy washy and needed more formal logic footing to be persistent, which is why working out these concepts in a formal math proof is a better argument as to why it's over.
I wonder if gender studies majors have to do shit like this, everything about the liberal arts is just sophistry for pretentious normies to justify their sexual existence
Last edited:
Perception of safety is a subjective thing. Let's say a guy is very large and muscular. While he is a super cool guy who never hurt a fly, the girl is giving consent only because she is sure that if she says no, he will beat her to pulp. So, you going to put him in jail only because of his appearance?
Rape only
Fed talk is for normies
i had to sit through shit like this when i was at uni. brutal
AHHHHHHHHGGGGGGGG!!!
I would sooner punch my own teeth out and stab my ear holes with two pens than even find out for a single second what her rag cunt slut voice even sounds like. FUCK THAT.
yes you are correct that axiom 1 is a brutal loophole that's specifically constructed with enough subjectivity to fuck you over, much like how certain TAX provisions are written into law to benefit the wealthiest and screw over working cucks the most.
However simply being AWARE of this will at least give you a footing to be more cautious
High IQ
Whenever we had such idiotic babbling like that on school or college I either started daydreaming about anime or went to the bathroom to escape the equivalent of ear rape
I DO NOT CONSENT TO HEARING ILLOGICAL NORMIE BABBLE
I DO NOT CONSENT TO HEARING ILLOGICAL NORMIE BABBLE
If you can't take their words at face value, then just don't care about it.
Crying because of a kiss 
this roastie probably had hundreds of Dicks in her and is complaining about a sub5 kissing her
this roastie probably had hundreds of Dicks in her and is complaining about a sub5 kissing her
We aren't even messing with these bitches what?
Look it's really very simple.
1. Be Chad.
2. Receive consent.
1. Be Chad.
2. Receive consent.
Similar threads
Antorian
Users who are viewing this thread
