Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

RageFuel he wouldnt survive one second being a manlet

he can join in 2035 where the hypergamy is ridiculous and foids spefically choose 6’2+
 
he can join in 2035 where the hypergamy is ridiculous and foids spefically choose 6’2+
6ft4 minimum you are being generous
 
that's still a pretty bad height in the west.
 
well you need at least 5'11
Wild West Cowboy GIF by Escape Hunt UK
 

View: https://www.reddit.com/r/short/comments/1o7ndku/5_foot_9_here_do_i_qualify_as_being_short




complaining about "only" being 5ft9 is CRAZY imagine if he woke up one day being 5ft7 he would rope instantly

Would a 5'9 man be driven to rope instantly if he were two inches shorter?

We don't have to guess. There's objective data from women's real secret preferences that quantifies exactly how bad 5'9 is compared to 5'7. The chart says that a 5'9 man has a chance with 17% of women, and a 5'7 man has a chance with 9% of women. So the 5'9 man has it almost twice as good...but even so, less than 80% of women would give him a chance at all.

1696356642998


Also note that this data is a few years old. This entire curve shifts leftward every year due to height inflation, reducing the disparity among men the S-shaped curve delineates as "short" (since they're all trending to zero). To extrapolate a little: it's 2025, five years from 2020, so let's add a modifier of -5 inches — women in 2025 perceive a 5'9 man as 5'4, and a 5'7 man as 5'2. With this updated standard, those two men would only have a chance with 3% and 2% of women. Every year, the 5'9 man grows (or shrinks) closer to 5'7 in terms of results.

Vzf1ik6ay1bc1
 
Last edited:
6ft4 minimum you are being generous
-1 std from the average height in the west is horrific for your smv. since foids will pick 2-3std in height. so in actuality, you are 4 std away from the peak smv value
 
-1 std from the average height in the west is horrific for your smv. since foids will pick 2-3std in height. so in actuality, you are 4 std away from the peak smv value
less complicated language pls
 
Would a 5'9 man be driven to rope instantly if he were two inches shorter?

We don't have to guess. There's objective data from women's real secret preferences that quantifies exactly how bad 5'9 is compared to 5'7. The chart says that a 5'9 man has a chance with 17% of women, and a 5'7 man has a chance with 9% of women. So the 5'9 man has it almost twice as good...but even so, less than 80% of women would give him a chance at all.

View attachment 1574521

Also note that this data is a few years old. This entire curve shifts leftward every year due to height inflation, reducing the disparity among men the S-shaped curve delineates as "short" (since they're all trending to zero). To extrapolate a little: it's 2025, five years from 2020, so let's add a modifier of -5 inches — women in 2025 perceive a 5'9 man as 5'4, and a 5'7 man as 5'2. With this updated standard, those two men would only have a chance with 3% and 2% of women. Every year, the 5'9 man grows (or shrinks) closer to 5'7 in terms of results.

View attachment 1574525
Brutal
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top