I've seen many times on this site users claiming that masturbation solves the issue of sexual urges and I think its time this nonsense was addressed once and for all and the coping stops
Saying that masturbation solves the issue of sexual urges is like saying just eating a lot of bread solves the issue of hunger
There's more to satisfying hunger than simply being full, just like there's more to satisfying sexual urges than simply ejaculating
If the food doesn't taste good you won't get much of a dopamine release from eating
If the food isn't nutritionally balanced your body won't have any resources to keep you healthy and functioning and in essence you will still feel fatigued and starved since you'll be deficient in nutrients, etc
Masturbation will never be enough because it is missing an aspect to it, that is what truly makes sex enjoyable for a man, DOMINANCE
There's a deeper satisfaction you get when you make a woman submit to your sexual whims, porn tries to imitate this phenomenon with the "money shot", that's the entire point of the "money shot", that's why its a staple in porn, its a means for you to live vicariously through that act, and see a woman in complete sexual submission, face covered in your seed, its an act of shaming the woman whilst simultaneously "marking/branding" her as yours, its like planting a flag on territory you've claimed, like how a dog pees on things it wants to let other dogs know its theirs, there's something very "primal" about it, and that's whats satisfying about sex, YOU CAN'T GET THAT FROM JERKING YOUR DICK
Masturbation can never be as satisfying as sex, I've had sex once (prostitute) and its a completely different experience, its ridiculous to compare sitting down, stroking your dick waiting to cum so you can stop thinking about sex, TO ACTUALLY PARTICIPATING IN THE ACT OF SEX RATHER THAN JUST ENDLESSLY THINKING ABOUT AND OBSESSING OVER IT
Its a very ironic statement to say that masturbation is a substitute for sex, here's why, try and follow the logic, if stroking your dick to an act satisfies you, WOULDN'T ACTUALLY DOING THE ACT SATISFY YOU MORE? (simple and obvious question to ask yourself)
This is common sense, of course its more satisfying and masturbation could never substitute it, just as bread could never substitute an entire diet
You don't even need to have sex to come to this realization, you just need to stop coping and think this through
To go even further this is why I think sex-bots are a cope, because you could never emulate that experience with a robot, you can't dominate something that you own and it can't really refuse, or resist your sex acts. A sex bot doesn't submit its body to you, it has no ownership of its body to begin with
Imagine the most amazing sexbot ever, it looks completely human, its a perfect 10/10 for you, guess what, you'll be bored with it after a fucking month, maybe even 2 weeks, and if you get a new and different one, you'll notice that you are becoming bored with sexbots on the whole, because it isn't satisfying your subconscious mind, the deeper and more primal parts of your mind (monkey brain, lizard brain, etc)
Sexual release without a partner, is nothing but surface level satisfaction, it won't truly satisfy you, it will always be "just enough to get you by", but it will never satisfy
Without domination there is no complete sexual satisfaction for a man, you are always going to feel like "something is missing", and no it isn't "love" or "affection", its dominance, the feeling of conquering someone, having them submit to you, the feeling of ownership and the security that comes with it, masturbation can't substitute that