The average incel on this site isn't some super ugly trucel, we need to stop this meme shit.
I guess this depends on where you distinguish 'normal ugly' from 'super ugly'.
Also I think we should find a different term than 'trucel' because it implies anyone not meeting your standard is 'fake'.
Something like 'ultracel' maybe.
Literally every face pic I've been sent for a rating was some average looking fuck, that looks no different that the guys who I see dating, and most of these guys that have sent the pics are taller than me.
Not sure why you think being taller than yourself means someone will ascend if they approach.
Also regarding there being guys you see "dating" that doesn't mean those guys are actually getting laid, or that they aren't being cucked.
Plus they may have differences beside whether or not they approach, such as how wealthy they are, or their social connections.
This forum is either lfilled with trolls pretending to be fakecel tallfags, or it's literally filled with fakecel tallfags.
Height isn't enough in isolation anymore unless you're a 6'5" or something bro.
Lets stop pretending like all of you guys are bottom of the barrel and completely hideous, that's bullshit.
Nobody's ever "completely" hideous, it's an approximation.
As for who qualifies as 'bottom of the barrel' I guess that depends on the barrel's width.
We need to stop the spread of this "volcel culture" nonsense.
If you haven't approached and you don't have a significant and visible physical defect, or a significant mental defect that ruins your communication skills, you shouldn't be calling yourself "incel".
I have significant defects which ruin my communication skills, and I have in the past (mostly teens/20s) approached girls in a very clumsy and cautious way, because I was (and am) terrified of coming across as too pushy and making them scared.
Despite this, my manner was described as "creepy" to my face. I should have seen that coming, but I didn't.
I'm not going to fault other celibates for having more foresight than me and predicting in advance this would happen and not wasting their time.
It doesn't make them fakecels just because they have better intuition than I do about an imminent failure.
You could literally just be some fucking retard that's keeping himself from getting laid because he doesn't want to put any effort in and risk feeling rejection.
At what point do you tolerate someone not spending every free moment on a fruitless pursuit?
Yeah I do fear rejection and dislike putting the effort in.
That's why after a moderate amount of rejections and effort I realized I was just repeating the same failed strategy and wasting my time.
Other people don't need to suffer as much as I did to qualify as my brethren.
If they foresaw this failure by observing the world around them - it just means they're less cucked than I was and avoid failed investments.
My being a slower learner doesn't make me a truer incel, just one who was bluepilled longer.
You could literally just be ruining your life because you are a coward and you don't want to face true rejection.
Ruination is an exaggeration for life.
It seems to me like you're describing a girl falling into your lap if you just brute-force approach techniques.
Even if brute-force hacking until you find a girl semi-compatible gets you a date with them, the date will tend to fail.
Even if you brute-force failed dates until you get a 2nd date, you're still probably going to get cucked with chad.
At what point of being cucked does a man qualify to give up and spend his resources more wisely?
An incel who has never approached coming to this forum, is like someone who can't swim because they never tried
Swimming is a skill you can more reliably attain than seducing women.
joining a forum of people who have almost drowned multiple times and stopped swimming because they learned they had some kind of disability.
WE ARE NOT THE SAME
Your analogy sucks though, anybody (unless you're Terry Crews - he sinks due to his muscle mass) can learn to float with some discipline and confidence.
The same genetic barriers do not exist in swimming as they do in dating.
Hell being a chubby fuck helps you float.
The litmus test for "am I incel?" isn't "I don't get Chad treatment" ("choosing signals").
There isn't any litmus test.
Absolute involuntariness doesn't technically exist, we are describing a continuum of progressively reduced chance.
What a lot of you are basically saying is "If you aren't Chad you're an incel".
The first requirement for being incelibate is being celibate.
We need to argue first what that actually means before moving onto arguing the 'involuntary' criteria.
We're putting the cart before the horse because even celibacy is confusing.
Escortcels are emotionally celibate (no validation by relationship and free sex) but not physically celibate (they have sex) for example.
Outright blatent whoring isn't the only kind of transactional sex though (betabuxers) which means where to draw the line on resource trading blurs.
A woman not giving you "positive reinforcement" through IOI's (Indicators Of Interest = Choosing Signals) DOES NOT MAKE YOU INCEL (most men don't get that shit).
Lack of IOI are literally what sets escortcels apart though.
The emcel component is important here.
It doesn't work like that, a lot of normie men (most men) don't get any positive reinforcement at all. They have to approach and keep getting rejected until a woman finally is willing to date and/or fuck them. Those few "wins" then becomes their positive reinforcement.
The wililngness to date which precedes the sex is actually the first reinforcement.
You can't argue that you are incel just because multiple women aren't giving you IOI's.
You should stop using an apostrophe there, it doesn't work like that BPP
Any man on here saying otherwise sounds as delusional as the 20 year old virgin (incel) guy Kevin Samuels is talking to in this video
(he's using retard tier logic):
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABqs-TQLzhA
5min vid, which part do you mean?
Not 6ft tall
Broke as hell (making way less than average - 10K a year, average is 30K)
Morbidly Obese: Enter his stats into this visualizer, the fucking scale doesn't even go up to his weight lol (
https://www.bmivisualizer.com/)
Isn't facially attractive
Knows he doesn't have a big dick
Etc, etc, etc
Yet he has the gall to go around thinking that women should be giving him "choosing signals" (positive reinforcement) so that he'll know that he should approach them. That's fucking ridiculous.
The reason he expects that or wants it is so that he doesn't get jailed for "creeping" on her.
This is the risk ugly men face in approaching women and asking for her phone number and stuff if they're sub-Chad.
Women have all of these options today and you think they are going to go around giving average and below average men IOI's to approach them????
No, because they're not interested in fucking us, and probably won't unless it's in a very iffy circumstance.
We can't go around talking about hypergamy and how unrealistic women's standards are, but we have retards on here trying to make it seem like it's not the man's role to approach when it comes to romantic courtship, and that women are supposed to be giving them "positive reinforcement" for them to approach first.
BPP all we're talking about is something like a smile in our direction that makes them seem approachable.
That's not how this shit works, it's never worked like that. You can't just now make up new rules and now everybody is fucking incel because they refuse to do what 99% of all men have to do (approach).
It has always worked like that for Chad, Chad might be the one to initiate dating or sex but he still gets signals from girls who like him.