NocturnalCel
Officer
★★
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2024
- Posts
- 603
I’m a national socialist. “Nazi” is a term created by your parasitic tribe.What you gonna do about it Nazi?
I’m a national socialist. “Nazi” is a term created by your parasitic tribe.What you gonna do about it Nazi?
I’ll support Hitler when I get aryan blonde rich white gfI’m a national socialist. “Nazi” is a term created by your parasitic tribe.
Wouldn’t hold your breath or count your shekels……I’ll support Hitler when I get aryan blonde rich white gf
Ok Soviet communism it is then for you filthy goyimWouldn’t hold your breath or count your shekels……
Ok Soviet communism it is then for you filthy goyim
View attachment 1309018
Yeah, we know this is your plan.
Oy vey! Maybe you can get the federal reserve to print some more shekels, and give me a kosher interest free loan?Stay broke loserArmy Career Match
Whether you know the career you want, or you’re still figuring it out, Army Career Match can help you find the right fit and opportunities you never knew existed.www.goarmy.com
How about you get a fucking job you lazy antisemetic bum?Oy vey! Maybe you can get the federal reserve to print some more shekels, and give me a kosher interest free loan?
I’m a wage cuck for a Jew actuallyHow about you get a fucking job you lazy antisemetic bum?
BrutalI’m a wage cuck for a Jew actually
Of course not, because who ever wins, the jews win. You serpents are a crafty devious bunch. I will give you that.Brutal
plz keep working so my stocks go up I don’t give af who wins election
You can’t ever win so why bother being anti semitrOf course not, because who ever wins, the jews win. You serpents are a crafty devious bunch. I will give you that.
Where you workI’m a wage cuck for a Jew actually
View: https://www.youtube.com/live/nMQqk8JIDcI?si=ldCeEn_0zAwpayJD
There is no excuse for that guy to suffer this much. He is innocent and Christcucks are still defending their made up religion despite all the horrible things that happen in our world, smh.
Law firmWhere you work
brutalWill watch later.
tbhI would honestly be best buddies with him, he looks so genuine. I can relate to his sentiment on way too many levels
client confidentialityLaw firm
yes teehee over brutal tbhngldedsrsThis is how 90% of us will end up at 40. Brutal
Then you're delusional if you think that there's always a form if idolatry behind evil, when it's just human nature. Christianity has a good idea on this with the original sin.I don't believe so. Idolatry is denial of reality, and this is what makes us act "like assholes making others suffer".
Sounds confused to me. You said before that for you, the father and the son were just metaphors for more tangible stuff. So i'm more worried about it being null spiritually.I said "Reality", not "this world". Calling the Father "Reality" is just respectfully acknowledging that we do not know what reality is. It is equivalent to apophatic theology's "God is unknowable". I do not presume to understand what lies behind the observable world. I just respectfully call Him Reality. I am no pantheist, if that is what you are worried about.
Charity does not aim at "solving" anything. Only God can "solve" problems. We just give to our brother in need to alleviate his suffering as much as we can.
Guess the modern world already does that a lot through govbux and all but it doesn't seem to make people happier with their situation. A material fix is always but a patch that cannot soothe the soul's deeper needs.Exactly. I never said I wanted to "solve" anything.
Will check once i get the time.You should read the text I sent you. You will see how I view Christianity.
You're wrong. Jesus says that's it's preferable to gouge your eye out and cut your hand off than to fap so no, the bible, even outside of Paul's teachings, DOES care about lust/chastity. So it's not a whim of later christians, but if you want to insist on the fact that they became fixated on it, you should acknowledge that they also did so in regard to other sins (the 7 deadly sins, pride, wrath, greed, gluttony, envy, sloth, lust). And, from all of those, contrary to what you claim, lust is NOT the worst sin, it is pride. Lust merely occupies the fifth position because they knew how weak the flesh was. The problem with people like you is that you always think yourself smarter than almost two thousands year of theology and come up with some rubbish nonsense.Because these ideas are not very important in Christianity, as expressed in the Bible. Very little space in it is devoted to these questions. It is only later Christians who became fixated on it and turned "sexual immorality" into the worst sin. In the Bible it is idolatry which is the chief sin, not sex.
Ishtar/Gilgamesh is sexual idolatry, not sex.
This is mental gymnastics to me. There is no "sexual worship" without lust/sex unbridled, it's the same thing. No one is pussy whipped just for the fun of it. If paying for hookers irl makes you different from pussy worshipping onlyfans subs or other type of simps, then it's only marginally so. I think even the old testament somewhat hints at those things with the canaanites constantly tempting the israelites with their cult of the sacred prostitute."social media/Onlyfans" is indeed "a form of global Ishtar worship", no doubt, but holier-than-thou claims of "chastity" will do nothing to oppose it spiritually because it is not the act of sex itself that is the problem. It is sexual worship that is.
Then it's only logical to start by domesticating your own sexuality, your own nature, if you want to reject this idolatry. Even when you're married, marriage being holy does not make it work on it's own and people in a holy union can have to fight off temptations like adultery too. Why though, aren't they just mammals that need to get their rocks off ?! With that type of reasoning you'd justify anything. A celibate is made in the image of god no less than a married person so he's faced with the same struggles although amplified, obviously, which is acknowledged in the new testament.In order to reject sexual idolatry in your life, you need to domesticate sexuality, in order to disentangle it from sexual idolatry. This is what traditional Christianity did by hallowing marriage.
Famously, Luther left his monastic order and then married a defrocked nun (a thermonuclear scandal at the time). By this, he meant to say: "I am not an angel, like monks pretend to be, I need to have sex every once in a while like any other mammal". This is also what I mean with hookers and paid sex.
No one sane in his own mind "pretends to be an angel", especially not monks that know their religion. This is such a stupid, profane and defamatory thing to say.Like Luther, I do not wish to pretend I am an angel.
I wouldn't think of internet trends as anything than just exactly that, it's narcissistic, prideful self-aggrandizing spectacle in the end. An internet tradwife doesn't have anything to do with reality to me, i don't know why you care.The reason I opt for this is that I consider marriage to be so debased today and so full of idolatry in its own right (tradwives and all that shit) that I want no part in it.
Ok, go and tell Jesus that he's a pharisee because he was a no-fapper. I think that in this case, pharisees act as a convenient tool to call good bad and bad good, something heathens do all the time by the way although in a more prosaic way, which sits at the core of contemporary western psychology regarding religion. "How dare you value higher ideals above the common filth that lies in the gutter, you surely must be a repressed degenerate or a hypocrite !" Using pharisees is just the more religious and intellectual version.Modern Christianity's pretense at "holiness" is just a return of the Pharisee's claims of purity.
No, your obsession with idolatry starts to get cringe. I was alluding to transcendence being fundamentally tied to a principle of resistance, like a muscle that grows through being exerted, like a fight between two entities. Even the bible clearly alludes to it, "being refined in the furnace of affliction" etc. But you want to sit on your ass living like a pig just as any other degenerate but still claim to transcendence ? To be honest i don't really believe in your spirituality, do you even pray ?This smacks of hero-worship idolatry.
See above. That's no justification at all and the bible does not buy it.Our soul is weak. Total depravity makes us incapable to "resist" anything. I believe you know this theological position. The problem with "testing your good will through direct resistance" is that it opens the door to Pelagianism, i.e. the idea that individual humans are perfectible on their own.
I think you see everything through that lense way too much to be honest, no everything is idolatry, some things in life are just human elements that are part of us.I am not saying that this is what you believe but this is a reason I dislike modern Christian notions of marriage. They are rife with hero-worship and implicit claims of of holier-than-thou "merit" while, in fact, being full of idolatrous behaviour (cult of the family, i.e. ancestor worship, wife as domestic priestess of the household gods, etc)
Yeah no "merit" like pleasing god and going to heaven ? Indeed, you said it before so it's double rubbish unchristian thinking but i guess i'm just talking with a new - one of the many - protestant denominations ! Your "christianity for coomers" doesn't make any sense for a sound mind. Seriously, Luther was a scourge of mankind.Like I said before. There is no "merit" in Christianity. The idea of gaining merit through chastity is a Pharisee and Islamic notion, not a Christian (biblical) one. Again, this is why Luther married. In doing so, he was fighting the Pharisees of his time. The idea that "a pious and chaste man or woman have some merit for their self-control" is the Pharisaism of our own time. I wish to oppose it by acknowledging that I occasionally hire hookers.
If he looks at her in a special way there are huge chances she's NOT chaste at all in the first place, which would make sense given the state churches are in nowadays. You know that chastity can also be pertaining to sexual modesty right ? A woman being like "a supermodel on display" ? That's a bad omen for chastity.When, at Church, a pastor's wife who looks like a supermodel is on display, even though she might be chaste, this is an act of sexual worship, even though no actual sex is involved.
I don't care about those internet assholes. You seem very confused yourself about what christianity really stands for so you try to make sense of it in a weird way. Do you know that not even 150 years ago many western women still wore headscarfs out of a habit that had it roots in christian modesty ? Nothing excessive, not even mandatory, and i'm not advocating for burqa stuff myself, but it says a lot. My great-grandma that passed away a few years ago did it until her death lol.If you look at the most successful "tradwives" influencer channels (Lauren Chen and the like), you will see the same thing. Modern Christianity has lost its understanding of what constitutes idolatry, sexual or otherwise.
To be pleasing to god as he intended you to be (which, personally, just feels like virtue and real peace of mind entering my life everytime i seriously give it a go) is not idolatry, and going to hookers/fapping is not transcendent at all. It's just you getting your rocks off, dude, and being a stoic mgtow.Replacing one idolatry with another would not solve his problem. Only replacing a false god(dess) with real transcendance would.
Oh i just thought that holiness was a state of mind, heart and soul in relation to god ("You will be holy, for I am holy" - Leviticus)... maybe you'd do better to subtract the word from the bible altogether then. And i thought chastity was just a virtue. The amount of circonvolutions you have to do here is quite scandalous."holiness and chastity" is just the badge of another form of hero-worship.
I guess where we disagree is that i say both are bad. But imo the marriage at least has some possibility of leading to something healthy, if you find an unicorn that is.Tradwives are just as bitchy and scornful (behind the "holiness" smile) as the average Stacey. Indeed, they are Stacys and they pour scorn on poor dudes like the one here just as much as more openly sexual Ishtar priestesses. Don't be fooled. Athena (chaste) is just as much an avatar of Ishtar (unchaste) as any other. Banging hookers is just a way to show to yourself that you DO NOT worship women.
Yes i did, and concluding that prostitution and porn are therefore based is a wrong deduction. First of all because there's no unanimity on the subject and they're infighting about it, some saying that "sex working" (recent euphemism spawned in soyworld which in and of itself should alert you of something) is empowering while some say it's a form of abuse perpetuated for the pleasure of men with women being hurt in the process. Fundamentally, what pisses them off is the question of male benefit at the expense of women, often exagerated in their hate and hysteria, so you should completely disregard stupid feminae brain effluvium they can't even agree on between themselves and rather look at the common denominator that is their scorn at "patriarchal norms of modesty". A man telling a woman not to dress like a whore is probably the most "misogynistic" thing you can do no matter the type of feminism judging you. The same type of women that want to ban porn can be showing their tits on the streets in a Femen protest in a mindless reflex.Have you ever wondered why ALL WOMEN, both conservative and leftie, are incensed at the idea of prostitution and porn?
yesbrutal
You wasted too many words on this moron. It's clear he picks and chooses regarding what he considers worshipping.But anyway i don't think i will engage further cause that type of things tend to annoy me. This is straight up denying of what's written black on white in the bible through some bizarre circonvolutions.
The posters in the back makes it more sad
View: https://www.youtube.com/live/nMQqk8JIDcI?si=ldCeEn_0zAwpayJD
There is no excuse for that guy to suffer this much. He is innocent and Christcucks are still defending their made up religion despite all the horrible things that happen in our world, smh.
You are a Catholic and therefore not a Christian. You worship the Virgin Mary as a goddess by calling her "The Mother of GOD" (theotokos). You believe that your priests do a sacrifice at the mass (real presence) although JC's sacrifice is final and He never said it should be repeated. This is black magic.But anyway i don't think i will engage further cause that type of things tend to annoy me. This is straight up denying of what's written black on white in the bible through some bizarre circonvolutions.
I went back to church but now i am becoming more and more of a gnosticIt's a good thing that I left Christianity/Catholicism when I was in college
We must revolt and show what chaotic good can do for a planet. We will fight for justiceThis poor baldingcel is a nice guy and he's living through hell and obviously gets no attention from women. Meanwhile a chad can murder somebody and there will be an army of foids simping for him. God isn't real or he's the most evil being in existence
View: https://www.youtube.com/live/nMQqk8JIDcI?si=ldCeEn_0zAwpayJD
There is no excuse for that guy to suffer this much. He is innocent and Christcucks are still defending their made up religion despite all the horrible things that happen in our world, smh.
You are a Catholic and therefore not a Christian. You worship the Virgin Mary as a goddess by calling her "The Mother of GOD" (theotokos). You believe that your priests do a sacrifice at the mass (real presence) although JC's sacrifice is final and He never said it should be repeated. This is black magic.
You are an idolater and a Pharisee.
Seriously dude if you are really that smart as a hapa refute his argument then
no true scotsman
You made what could be called an appeal to purity as a way to dismiss relevant criticisms or flaws of your argument.In this form of faulty reasoning one's belief is rendered unfalsifiable because no matter how compelling the evidence is, one simply shifts the goalposts so that it wouldn't apply to a supposedly 'true' example. This kind of post-rationalization is a way of avoiding valid criticisms of one's argument.
Ok. With Christianity, it is quite easy to avoid the "No true Scotsman" problem because the dogma of the Church is very well defined. The problem the Catholics have is that they do not obey their own dogma, something that protestants have been saying for 500 years.Seriously dude if you are really that smart as a hapa refute his argument then
Christianity is the only serious way to oppose Chad and Stacy. Did you know that Christianity forced barbarian kings to become monogamous in the Middle ages? And then made kings themselves disappear altogether?While you guys argue about Christianity there's a non religious chad filling stacies guts with his nut
Cope. God gave them a life while he made us rot on an incel forum.Christianity is the only serious way to oppose Chad and Stacy. Did you know that Christianity forced barbarian kings to become monogamous in the Middle ages? And then made kings themselves disappear altogether?
Chad is just "the return of the King" and Stacies are the return of His harem. This happened because incels (who used to be the backbone of the Church) stopped understanding how things work.
If you just yell "Chad bad!" and "Stacy Slut!", you just make them laugh. Only the social pressure power of Christianity has ever been able to resist them effectively
I replied to you above but, of course, got no answer ....Seriously dude if you are really that smart as a hapa refute his argument then
I'm busy with my life and honestly this forum sucksI replied to you above but, of course, got no answer ....
Easier to run away when the going gets tough, right?
Ancient Germanic tribes were monogamous so is ancient slavic tribesDid you know that Christianity forced barbarian kings to become monogamous in the Middle ages? And then made kings themselves disappear altogether?
Is that any better than modern day protestant who simp for israel and israelis?something that protestants have been saying for 500 years.
- The first commandment prohibits idolatry and the second commandment prohibits the making of images for the purpose of worship.
FinallyI'm busy with my life and honestly this forum sucks
The rank and file in these tribes might have been monogamous but the kings (i.e. Chads) were not.Ancient Germanic tribes were monogamous so is ancient slavic tribes
The point here is not whether the 1st commandment is good or bad. The point is that Catholics supposedly uphold it while infringing on it constantly. This makes THEM hypocrites.Is that any better than modern day protestant who simp for israel and israelis?
I smell hypocrisy here
Boudica or Klaus Arminius only have one spouse if i remmember correctlyAll Germanic kings of the Post-Roman kingdoms in Western Europe (Franks, Burgundians, Goths, Lombards, ...) had loads of concubines or "secondary wives". The Church fought this for centuries and managed to stamp it out completely by around the year 1000 AD.
Clovis and his sons. Gondioc and his descendants (Burgundians). Alaric and the other Wisigothic kings of Spain. Etc.Boudica or Klaus Arminius only have one spouse if i remmember correctly
who are these figures?