I’m a national socialist. “Nazi” is a term created by your parasitic tribe.
I’ll support Hitler when I get aryan blonde rich white gf
Wouldn’t hold your breath or count your shekels……
Ok Soviet communism it is then for you filthy goyim
Army Career Match
Whether you know the career you want, or you’re still figuring it out, Army Career Match can help you find the right fit and opportunities you never knew existed.
Oy vey! Maybe you can get the federal reserve to print some more shekels, and give me a kosher interest free loan?Stay broke loserArmy Career Match
Whether you know the career you want, or you’re still figuring it out, Army Career Match can help you find the right fit and opportunities you never knew existed.www.goarmy.com
How about you get a fucking job you lazy antisemetic bum?
I’m a wage cuck for a Jew actually
Brutal
plz keep working so my stocks go up I don’t give af who wins election
Of course not, because who ever wins, the jews win. You serpents are a crafty devious bunch. I will give you that.
You can’t ever win so why bother being anti semitr
Where you work
I would honestly be best buddies with him, he looks so genuine. I can relate to his sentiment on way too many levels
Law firm
brutal
client confidentiality
yes teehee over brutal tbhngldedsrsThis is how 90% of us will end up at 40. Brutal
Then you're delusional if you think that there's always a form if idolatry behind evil, when it's just human nature. Christianity has a good idea on this with the original sin.
Sounds confused to me. You said before that for you, the father and the son were just metaphors for more tangible stuff. So i'm more worried about it being null spiritually.
Guess the modern world already does that a lot through govbux and all but it doesn't seem to make people happier with their situation. A material fix is always but a patch that cannot soothe the soul's deeper needs.
Will check once i get the time.
You're wrong. Jesus says that's it's preferable to gouge your eye out and cut your hand off than to fap so no, the bible, even outside of Paul's teachings, DOES care about lust/chastity. So it's not a whim of later christians, but if you want to insist on the fact that they became fixated on it, you should acknowledge that they also did so in regard to other sins (the 7 deadly sins, pride, wrath, greed, gluttony, envy, sloth, lust). And, from all of those, contrary to what you claim, lust is NOT the worst sin, it is pride. Lust merely occupies the fifth position because they knew how weak the flesh was. The problem with people like you is that you always think yourself smarter than almost two thousands year of theology and come up with some rubbish nonsense.
This is mental gymnastics to me. There is no "sexual worship" without lust/sex unbridled, it's the same thing. No one is pussy whipped just for the fun of it. If paying for hookers irl makes you different from pussy worshipping onlyfans subs or other type of simps, then it's only marginally so. I think even the old testament somewhat hints at those things with the canaanites constantly tempting the israelites with their cult of the sacred prostitute.
Then it's only logical to start by domesticating your own sexuality, your own nature, if you want to reject this idolatry. Even when you're married, marriage being holy does not make it work on it's own and people in a holy union can have to fight off temptations like adultery too. Why though, aren't they just mammals that need to get their rocks off ?! With that type of reasoning you'd justify anything. A celibate is made in the image of god no less than a married person so he's faced with the same struggles although amplified, obviously, which is acknowledged in the new testament.
No one sane in his own mind "pretends to be an angel", especially not monks that know their religion. This is such a stupid, profane and defamatory thing to say.
As the bible says : "You are to be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect".
And, though, at the same time : "Who will release and deliver me from this body of death?"
This is not a contradiction, just a consequence of being made in the image of god although in a very faillible body. It doesn't mean that you don't have to try. Again, people like Luther were already discussed in the bible long before this nefarious bellend even existed. Jesus himself says that some can live without marriage while some cannot.
The disciples said to him, “If such is the case of a man with his wife, it is better not to marry.” But he said to them, “Not everyone can receive this saying, but only those to whom it is given. For there are eunuchs who have been so from birth, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by men, and there are eunuchs who have made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. Let the one who is able to receive this receive it.”
But this asshole, instead of looking introspectively, chose to rage at the world. "Sola fide" come across as quite convenient for people that act badly.
I wouldn't think of internet trends as anything than just exactly that, it's narcissistic, prideful self-aggrandizing spectacle in the end. An internet tradwife doesn't have anything to do with reality to me, i don't know why you care.
Ok, go and tell Jesus that he's a pharisee because he was a no-fapper. I think that in this case, pharisees act as a convenient tool to call good bad and bad good, something heathens do all the time by the way although in a more prosaic way, which sits at the core of contemporary western psychology regarding religion. "How dare you value higher ideals above the common filth that lies in the gutter, you surely must be a repressed degenerate or a hypocrite !" Using pharisees is just the more religious and intellectual version.
And "modern christianity" ? These things were discussed in the first centuries of roman christianity.
No, your obsession with idolatry starts to get cringe. I was alluding to transcendence being fundamentally tied to a principle of resistance, like a muscle that grows through being exerted, like a fight between two entities. Even the bible clearly alludes to it, "being refined in the furnace of affliction" etc. But you want to sit on your ass living like a pig just as any other degenerate but still claim to transcendence ? To be honest i don't really believe in your spirituality, do you even pray ?
See above. That's no justification at all and the bible does not buy it.
I think you see everything through that lense way too much to be honest, no everything is idolatry, some things in life are just human elements that are part of us.
Yeah no "merit" like pleasing god and going to heaven ? Indeed, you said it before so it's double rubbish unchristian thinking but i guess i'm just talking with a new - one of the many - protestant denominations !
Your "christianity for coomers" doesn't make any sense for a sound mind. Seriously, Luther was a scourge of mankind.If he looks at her in a special way there are huge chances she's NOT chaste at all in the first place, which would make sense given the state churches are in nowadays. You know that chastity can also be pertaining to sexual modesty right ? A woman being like "a supermodel on display" ? That's a bad omen for chastity.
I don't care about those internet assholes. You seem very confused yourself about what christianity really stands for so you try to make sense of it in a weird way. Do you know that not even 150 years ago many western women still wore headscarfs out of a habit that had it roots in christian modesty ? Nothing excessive, not even mandatory, and i'm not advocating for burqa stuff myself, but it says a lot. My great-grandma that passed away a few years ago did it until her death lol.
"But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart. If your right eye causes you to stumble, gouge it out and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to be thrown into hell. And if your right hand causes you to stumble, cut it off and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to go into hell."
Again, as i said, "sexual idolatry" and lust/acting out on it are the same thing, making them so independent from one another is complete nonsense whether on a more intimate spiritual level or holistically.
To be pleasing to god as he intended you to be (which, personally, just feels like virtue and real peace of mind entering my life everytime i seriously give it a go) is not idolatry, and going to hookers/fapping is not transcendent at all. It's just you getting your rocks off, dude, and being a stoic mgtow.
Oh i just thought that holiness was a state of mind, heart and soul in relation to god ("You will be holy, for I am holy" - Leviticus)... maybe you'd do better to subtract the word from the bible altogether then. And i thought chastity was just a virtue. The amount of circonvolutions you have to do here is quite scandalous.
I guess where we disagree is that i say both are bad. But imo the marriage at least has some possibility of leading to something healthy, if you find an unicorn that is.
Yes i did, and concluding that prostitution and porn are therefore based is a wrong deduction. First of all because there's no unanimity on the subject and they're infighting about it, some saying that "sex working" (recent euphemism spawned in soyworld which in and of itself should alert you of something) is empowering while some say it's a form of abuse perpetuated for the pleasure of men with women being hurt in the process. Fundamentally, what pisses them off is the question of male benefit at the expense of women, often exagerated in their hate and hysteria, so you should completely disregard stupid feminae brain effluvium they can't even agree on between themselves and rather look at the common denominator that is their scorn at "patriarchal norms of modesty". A man telling a woman not to dress like a whore is probably the most "misogynistic" thing you can do no matter the type of feminism judging you. The same type of women that want to ban porn can be showing their tits on the streets in a Femen protest in a mindless reflex.
Chastity for both men and women is the greatest ennemy of the Femiurge because it renders the power of the Whore of Babylon (her seductiveness) ineffectual. All this gynocentric society nowadays revolves around the power of the pussy and it's not a coincidence.
But anyway i don't think i will engage further cause that type of things tend to annoy me. This is straight up denying of what's written black on white in the bible through some bizarre circonvolutions.
yes
While you guys argue about Christianity there's a non religious chad filling stacies guts with his nut
You wasted too many words on this moron. It's clear he picks and chooses regarding what he considers worshipping.But anyway i don't think i will engage further cause that type of things tend to annoy me. This is straight up denying of what's written black on white in the bible through some bizarre circonvolutions.
Although, admittedly, I got more insights from you because of it
The advocacy of prostitution from blackpilled men just seems like an infiltration scheme. Their bizarre justifications about how sex keeps men from going violent, obviously recounting tales of priestesses of Babylon, seem nonsensical given sexhavers are far more violent towards foids than those who lack it.
Last edited:
Me.
You are a Catholic and therefore not a Christian. You worship the Virgin Mary as a goddess by calling her "The Mother of GOD" (theotokos). You believe that your priests do a sacrifice at the mass (real presence) although JC's sacrifice is final and He never said it should be repeated. This is black magic.But anyway i don't think i will engage further cause that type of things tend to annoy me. This is straight up denying of what's written black on white in the bible through some bizarre circonvolutions.
You are an idolater and a Pharisee.
I went back to church but now i am becoming more and more of a gnostic
We must revolt and show what chaotic good can do for a planet. We will fight for justice
R
Crying wont get you shit no one gives a fuck not even incels.
I feel for him, brutal.
Only suferers can understand suferers
Only suferers can understand suferers
May Ochako Uraraka bless him with a sweet loving virgin gf
Seriously dude if you are really that smart as a hapa refute his argument then
Ok. With Christianity, it is quite easy to avoid the "No true Scotsman" problem because the dogma of the Church is very well defined. The problem the Catholics have is that they do not obey their own dogma, something that protestants have been saying for 500 years.
- The first commandment prohibits idolatry and the second commandment prohibits the making of images for the purpose of worship.
- Catholics worship the Virgin Mary as the "Queen of Heaven" and the "Mother of God" (theotokos in Greek). Both title have long been associated with pagan deities. For example, Hera/Juno is the "Queen of Heaven" in the Greek/Roman pantheon. Isis is an other "Queen of Heaven" and she is also the mother of Horus, hence "Mother of God". Mary is also worshiped by Catholics in the form of processions, prayers addressed to her (the rosary, among others) and as a healing deity (Lourdes). Of course, all this involves a lot of images.
- The classic excuse Catholics give for this is that they "venerate" Mary (and the saints) instead of "worshiping" her. The problem with this is that there is no appreciable difference in the meaning of the 2 verbs in modern English. If anything, "venerate" is stronger than "worship". Furthermore, the etymology of "venerate" comes from the word "Venus" in latin (like the adjective "venerian"). In other word, Catholics treat Mary as the Romans treated Venus! Betrayed by their vocabulary ...
- The bottom of the matter is that Catholicism (Western Christianity) was formed in Late Antiquity and the high middle ages, when Christianity had become the official religion (of the late Empire and its successor kingdoms) and it was therefore necessary to accept masses of superficially converted people into the Church. As a result, many concessions were made so that the new believers would not have too many habits to change. This was perfectly understandable at the time but what is not acceptable, I think, is the fact that the Catholic Church continues to pretend that all this is impeccably Christian. Rome is an institution that has become too old. They want to pretend that they are "infallible" and as a result cannot admit past mistakes, even if the issues are obviously in contradiction with the Bible and the very dogma of the Church itself.
- For the "real presence" of the flesh and blood of JC in the mass, it is the same. As this is a technical matter, I think it would be boring to go into details here. The classic treatment of this question is, for example, given in Calvin's Institutions of the Christian religion, Book IV, Chapter 17 and 18.
@Kamanbert
Last edited:
Christianity is the only serious way to oppose Chad and Stacy. Did you know that Christianity forced barbarian kings to become monogamous in the Middle ages? And then made kings themselves disappear altogether?While you guys argue about Christianity there's a non religious chad filling stacies guts with his nut
Chad is just "the return of the King" and Stacies are the return of His harem. This happened because incels (who used to be the backbone of the Church) stopped understanding how things work.
If you just yell "Chad bad!" and "Stacy Slut!", you just make them laugh. Only the social pressure power of Christianity has ever been able to resist them effectively
Too brutal to watch also I can't understand what he's saying.
Can someone tldr please?
Can someone tldr please?
Cope. God gave them a life while he made us rot on an incel forum.
I replied to you above but, of course, got no answer ....
Easier to run away when the going gets tough, right?
How old is this poor baldcel?
D
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCjK3C0YEd4
HE IS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT NOW VOTE HIM NEXT ELECTION
I'm busy with my life and honestly this forum sucks
Ancient Germanic tribes were monogamous so is ancient slavic tribes
There is some historical innaccuracy from your argument
Ethnoreligious is older than Christianity
Viking on the other hand not so monogamous
Last edited:
Is that any better than modern day protestant who simp for israel and israelis?
I smell hypocrisy here
Finally
The rank and file in these tribes might have been monogamous but the kings (i.e. Chads) were not.
All Germanic kings of the Post-Roman kingdoms in Western Europe (Franks, Burgundians, Goths, Lombards, ...) had loads of concubines or "secondary wives". The Church fought this for centuries and managed to stamp it out completely by around the year 1000 AD.
Not so in Islam. The Mullahs always allowed the Chaddams to have their Harems. Not so based after all.
The point here is not whether the 1st commandment is good or bad. The point is that Catholics supposedly uphold it while infringing on it constantly. This makes THEM hypocrites.
No "true Scotsman fallacy" here. The contradiction above is DOCUMENTED on countless Catholic official publications, photos, videos, etc.
Boudica or Klaus Arminius only have one spouse if i remmember correctly
who are these figures?
Clovis and his sons. Gondioc and his descendants (Burgundians). Alaric and the other Wisigothic kings of Spain. Etc.
These figures are much better known than Boudica and Arminius, who are semi-legendary. The post-Roman kings, by contrast, were historical figures who left a great deal of historical evidence in the form of inscriptions and documents.
@K9Otaku
what about Christian Identary?
Is there anything wrong on them?
what about Christian Identary?
Is there anything wrong on them?
polygamy is more prevalent among viking though
Similar threads
The Scarlet Prince
Users who are viewing this thread
