JFL at all the retards eating up this pity party scam.
fatso's description is packed with grifter donation links.
fatso's description is packed with grifter donation links.
Yes he did.
Justin Bieber and Henry Cavill are not where and who they are solely because of all their hard work.
They are where and who they are near entirely because of good genetics provided to them by a god assuming such a being even exists.
I only tucked the “near” word in there because quite obviously every giga mogger has a choice on whether they want to get out there and fulfill their god/evolution/dna given/based potential or not whereas guys like us?
We have no choice.
We are what we are.
If “god” didn’t want this guy to be a “fat faggot” with no inherent societal value he most certainly wouldn’t be.
He would be fulfilled and happy now.
The same as all of us.
Maybe there's a darker force that's the cause of the suffering of men. Blaming God is mainstream.
Christianity is a sect created by the Romans with a Flavian premise, being a satire on the Jews.
Sad shit man, he is very relatable, unfit for life.
My two cents, last time God got rid of evil, He drowned entire human population. We are all evil and hurt others, in one way or another, more or less. As long as humans will lead themselves, there will be evil and suffering. Only way out is death.
My two cents, last time God got rid of evil, He drowned entire human population. We are all evil and hurt others, in one way or another, more or less. As long as humans will lead themselves, there will be evil and suffering. Only way out is death.
Is this an FTM?
First time i see a nose like this. Why does it have cheeks mang
Tldr the video pls
The suffering of true innocence will never not make me angry
Incorrect you filthy Jewish neurotypicals want a fellow erenyeagerian institutionalized. I’ll correctify you if you dare touch a erenyeagerian
NIGGER!!!!!There are two types of christianity : the cucked one and the real one. for example you have rev 3 9
Your ""parents"" allegedly glowie believe in the cucked one obviously, how can you not tell? how fucking NOT obvious is that?
>inb4 you twist your own words I'm calling it.
I always cringe so hard it is painful.
This is double standard brain at work :
- some ""blackpillers"" when they question everything they were ever taught and apply blackpill theory
- those ""blackpillers"" when they question the bible and go teenager rhetoric ""god is ebil and muh angels help muh humanity" sub 80 normalfag brain that you only find in bluepiller brains
None of those posting about muh evil god is an organic user, not even a nice try glowie.
In the 60’s, 70’s or 80’s a dude that looks like this would be a happily married father with 8 kids and a mid tier Becky looks matched wife.
In today’s world however of social media and extreme narcissism and out of control hypergamy?
It’s beyond over for him.
Infact it never even began.
Brutal.
P.S: I’d discovered this guys channel myself a while back and was considering posting it.
Not all that surprised another brocel found it.
There are two types of christianity : the cucked one and the real one. for example you have rev 3 9
Your ""parents"" allegedly glowie believe in the cucked one obviously, how can you not tell? how fucking NOT obvious is that?
>inb4 you twist your own words I'm calling it.
I always cringe so hard it is painful.
This is double standard brain at work :
- some ""blackpillers"" when they question everything they were ever taught and apply blackpill theory
- those ""blackpillers"" when they question the bible and go teenager rhetoric ""god is ebil and muh angels help muh humanity" sub 80 normalfag brain that you only find in bluepiller brains
None of those posting about muh evil god is an organic user, not even a nice try glowie.
The OT says that if you break the 1st commandment, you will go to Hell.
This guy is a fem-worshiper (Ishtar, Whore of Babylon, etc) and is therefore in Hell. No surprise here.
I am not a Christcuck in any of the traditional senses of the word. However, I recognize the wisdom of the Bible. If you worship something evil, you will be a slave to that evil and, of course, you will suffer as a consequence.
There is no doubt most foids are devil-worshiping demons (e.g. Jeremy Meeks). Yes, absolutely!
As a result, let us not worship them as this guy does. Let us be nerds. Let us earn IT-bucks and let us screw escorts, while enjoying seeing them squirm when we disrobe our pallid blubbery bodies before penetrating them.
Most redpillers are full of shit, of course, but they have a point. We NEED to learn how to live without fem validation. Otherwise we are all dead.
BTW, I am mentioning once again the idea of an escort fund for poorcels who cannot afford paid sex. Those of us who earn enough money can chip in for the penniless brothers.
Based, i like your thread on the Ishtar/Gilgamesh worship. It's true that if we can't be blessed by Ishtar/Stacey (i mean by that any woman in an abstract sense) then we should obey to a different principle (this goes beyond self-interest though, as you said foids are often objectively evil, this is what some mentalcels might be actually struggling with).
But i don't think it's really possible to do that without transcendence. Money, escorts ? This is just some coping MSTOW stuff. I really don't see a lonely man truly having peace of mind without transcendence
Last edited:
Isn't that fem-worshipping too?
When I call women “devil”, I am emphasizing that they are (allegorically) bad, and not that they worship a supposed “devil”, because he does not exist. This was the influence of Persia, influencing reactionary Jewish scriptures; but the two are not related.And you say you know the Bible has “wisdom,” okay. In the beginning, the Bible was a book of primitive Jews, the Tanak was a book written by apologetic priests, it does not even have any connection with the true central doctrine of factual archeology. And some ‘books’ written are just letters that have already been demythologized. The New Testament itself, for example, was translated into Greek, and Hebrew has no translation of it.
The Bible has no wisdom at all, it's you who has no study and doesn't know the Hellenistic and Platonic shit it preaches. HOWEVER, believe whatever shit you want, I really don't care.
This poor baldingcel is a nice guy and he's living through hell and obviously gets no attention from women. Meanwhile a chad can murder somebody and there will be an army of foids simping for him. God isn't real or he's the most evil being in existence
I do not think so. Sex is natural. Worship is not. Better get your dick wet for a price rather than grovel at the feet of the great goddess hoping for "validation"Isn't that fem-worshipping too?
I fully agree that transcendence is the key. I just did not mention it in my original post bc very few people here understand what it means.Based, i like your thread on the Ishtar/Gilgamesh worship. It's true that if we can't be blessed by Ishtar/Stacey (i mean by that any woman in an abstract sense) then we should obey to a different principle (this goes beyond self-interest though, as you said foids are often objectively evil, this is what some mentalcels might be actually struggling with).
But i don't think it's really possible to do that without transcendence. Money, escorts ? This is just some coping MSTOW stuff. I really don't see a lonely man truly having peace of mind without transcendence
My own idea of transcendance is a modernized version of the Father/Son dyad (the HS just being the invisible presence of the Son) disentangled from traditional Christian myth. To me:
- "The Father" is just Reality. No one denies that Reality exists. "God" or "the Father" is just a respectful term acknowledging the absolute transcendence of Reality over us.
- "The Son", which I prefer to call "The Logos", is the presence of a guiding intelligible tradition among us. Our individual intellectual capabilities are clearly unequal to the task of helping us make personal decision. For that, we need the accumulated wisdom of the countless generations that preceded us. This is what "the Logos" means to me. It is also transcendant because we are unable to challenge it or second-guess it based on our own limited faculties.
- Whether someone called "Jesus" existed at some point in the past is irrelevant because that story has become unable to carry the meaning it once had. Some new formulation of the same ideas is required.
That is worshipping, too. There are just more layers to it. Men, advocating for escortmaxxing, don't (wanna) acknowledge it.
You're facilitating their first-class lifestyle with your slaving first and then funding their lifestyle with your money while you're rotting and saving pennies to get off once a month.
Last edited:
God doesn't have anything to do with it, god gave humanity freedom and humanity f*cked this up.
When humanity was in a similar situation with s0d0m and g0mmora and before the flood, god acted and restarted society multiple times, but humanity doesn't learn and they fall into the trap of satan and his people (the j00s aka ed0mits, cannanites, Khazar, kanites etc..)
The one to blame is the traitors that colluded with the j00s and created m0dernity and the debt financial system
When humanity was in a similar situation with s0d0m and g0mmora and before the flood, god acted and restarted society multiple times, but humanity doesn't learn and they fall into the trap of satan and his people (the j00s aka ed0mits, cannanites, Khazar, kanites etc..)
The one to blame is the traitors that colluded with the j00s and created m0dernity and the debt financial system
I haven't read the whole Bible but it is brutal man, the only thing it promises you in this life is struggle and pain.
I seemingly offers some tools to make peace with this fact, and find joy in the eternal citizenship of the kingdom to come, but the discipline and strength to actually obtain such a birthright is a novelty afforded to very few.
I'm definitely subscribed to the belief of it being true, but whether or not I conduct myself according to its teaching is another story, I'm a drug addict and alcoholic, have been for a long time, but the book is uncanny at predicting the circumstances of this reality and is so truthful of the sheer nature of this cruel ass fuckin world.
Your threads on those topics, were based, good to see your still active homie.
What is the shape of the earth?
Thanks
>fat and ungroomed
volcel
volcel
he just needs to hit the gym, hop on finasteride, and improve his personality.
Modern life is not worth it
Interesting, it's some sort of ultra materialistic gnosis then.
Thing is, to me, even if you did establish a transcendantal system, it doesn’t make it a good one. The definition of transcendance in itself is "being beyond the ordinary", so when it's system is based on prosaic stuff like money and hookers, it's efficiency can leave to be desired imo. Not to even mention that poorcels would be excluded.My idea of transcendance is nothing original, just the general idea of a superior plane whose grace can be approached through our reality. I think the concept of sin is essential for this and could greatly resonate with the Ishtar/Gilgamesh vs God the Father, Authority-S vs Authority-L dichotomies, because transcendence, as everything else i think is like a muscle and grows as you test it, so i really think that a principle of resistance is essential to effective transcendence. If Ishtar/Gilgamesh are evil, you fight them as a solder of God the Father and that fight in itself is the ultimate cope against their reality !
Last edited:
Not at all!. You can call it "post-Christian pisticism", if you want. We do not have knowledge, only trust (pistis in Greek). Trust saves (= Sola Fide).
Transcendance must always be based on Reality. That is the very definition of transcendance. "The Father" in the Christian tradition is Reality. Treating "Him" as a person is just to show respect. What we don't understand but is awesomely transcendent, we respect, if we are not insane. Saying "He" rather than "it" about reality is just minimum respect.
Money and hookers is what we employ for something that is necessary but not very important: sex. Like we use toilet bowls and toilet flush apparatus for our excretion needs. There is nothing transcendant in sex. It is just a need we should fulfill with the minimum amount of fuss in order to free our mind for what genuinely matters: transcendence. Charity can provide for poorcel's needs, like it always did for the needs of the poor.
"plane" or "Person"? Do you call transcendance "it" or "He". To me, a "plane" is an it ...
Fully agree. Sin is, according to me, the same as in the Bible: idolatry and its consequences.I think the concept of sin is essential for this and could greatly resonate with the Ishtar/Gilgamesh vs God the Father, Authority-S vs Authority-L dichotomies, because transcendence, as everything else i think is like a muscle and grows as you test it, so i really think that a principle of resistance is essential to effective transcendence. If Ishtar/Gilgamesh are evil, you fight them as a solder of God the Father and that fight in itself is the ultimate cope against their reality !
Ishtar/Gilgamesh are the eternal chief idols. Ishtar is "the whore of Babylon" and Gilgamesh is Belial (or Barabbas), in the NT.
Today, they are called Stacey/Chad, but they are the same as ever.
Here is a link to a fuller version to the text quoted in part in the Ishtar thread. Chapters 9 and 10 make the connection with Christianity explicit.
Last edited:
Fuck god, hail satan
Well just us being there tied to the passions of our flesh and acting like assholes making others suffer is enough to make us acknowledge reality very strongly. You know that in christianity, god is "not of this world" right ? But you make the first person of the trinity our reality itself, when normally there's a level of interdependency. This alone makes your transcendantal system into a form of stoicism at best because you consider the mundane as being the absolute so in the end it there's not much transcendence in it imo.
If the material is the ultimate coping tool then no you won't solve it through charity unless you're willing to give an insane amount to the needy, let's be realistic here. But even if you did ? Even christianity don't have this pretense, charity is more like an alleviation while god is the real solution.
I could've said god or "the divine", it was just an abstraction cause you said yourself that you don't really believe in god. Unless you meant something else by saying that you were not a christian and only considered the bible through the wisdom it offers.
And yet you completely disregard christian ideas on lust/chastity. When it would make sense as it is Ishtar/Gilgamesh vs God the Father/ Authority-S vs Authority-L on steroids, with a transcendental twist placing your soul on a battlefield between good and evil, testing your good will through direct resistance. You said yourself that Ishtar/Gilgamesh worship exists through "credit masturbation" by acts or thoughts, so it would be logical that the antithetical principle has it's own form of credit masturbation.
You wouldn't disagree that the power of foids through social media/Onlyfans is a form of global Ishtar worship, so how banging hookers would be any different ? And wouldn't a pious and chaste man or woman have some merit for their self-control ?
Guess what i'm saying is that there's no transcendence without a real god like in the bible instead of an abstract version of it like in your outlooks. And that if there's a principle of evil, there should be an inverse goodness. I mean if you acknowledge Authority-S as a scourge and the existence of sin at the same time it doesn't make sense to be ok with any form of hedonism.
And as @SmhChan said even on a mundane level this kinda sucks, adding fuel to the fire of gynocracy. It could be said that this logically overlaps with the spiritual.
I mean if you acknowledge Authority-S as a scourge and the existence of sin at the same time it doesn't make sense to be ok with any form of hedonism.And as @SmhChan said even on a mundane level this kinda sucks, adding fuel to the fire of gynocracy. It could be said that this logically overlaps with the spiritual.
Last edited:
Btw there's no better example than our big crying fella right there. You think banging hookers would've made him happy ? I really don't think so tbh. My intuition is that coping with holiness and chastity would do a better job !
I don't believe so. Idolatry is denial of reality, and this is what makes us act "like assholes making others suffer".
I said "Reality", not "this world". Calling the Father "Reality" is just respectfully acknowledging that we do not know what reality is. It is equivalent to apophatic theology's "God is unknowable". I do not presume to understand what lies behind the observable world. I just respectfully call Him Reality. I am no pantheist, if that is what you are worried about.
Charity does not aim at "solving" anything. Only God can "solve" problems. We just give to our brother in need to alleviate his suffering as much as we can.
Exactly. I never said I wanted to "solve" anything.
You should read the text I sent you. You will see how I view Christianity.
Because these ideas are not very important in Christianity, as expressed in the Bible. Very little space in it is devoted to these questions. It is only later Christians who became fixated on it and turned "sexual immorality" into the worst sin. In the Bible it is idolatry which is the chief sin, not sex.
Ishtar/Gilgamesh is sexual idolatry, not sex. In order to reject sexual idolatry in your life, you need to domesticate sexuality, in order to disentangle it from sexual idolatry. This is what traditional Christianity did by hallowing marriage. Famously, Luther left his monastic order and then married a defrocked nun (a thermonuclear scandal at the time). By this, he meant to say: "I am not an angel, like monks pretend to be, I need to have sex every once in a while like any other mammal". This is also what I mean with hookers and paid sex. The reason I opt for this is that I consider marriage to be so debased today and so full of idolatry in its own right (tradwives and all that shit) that I want no part in it. Nevertheless, I still need to empty my balls occasionally, and I wish to acknowledge that publicly. Like Luther, I do not wish to pretend I am an angel. Modern Christianity's pretense at "holiness" is just a return of the Pharisee's claims of purity.
This smacks of hero-worship idolatry. Our soul is weak. Total depravity makes us incapable to "resist" anything. I believe you know this theological position. The problem with "testing your good will through direct resistance" is that it opens the door to Pelagianism, i.e. the idea that individual humans are perfectible on their own. I am not saying that this is what you believe but this is a reason I dislike modern Christian notions of marriage. They are rife with hero-worship and implicit claims of of holier-than-thou "merit" while, in fact, being full of idolatrous behaviour (cult of the family, i.e. ancestor worship, wife as domestic priestess of the household gods, etc)
Like I said before. There is no "merit" in Christianity. The idea of gaining merit through chastity is a Pharisee and Islamic notion, not a Christian (biblical) one. Again, this is why Luther married. In doing so, he was fighting the Pharisees of his time. The idea that "a pious and chaste man or woman have some merit for their self-control" is the Pharisaism of our own time. I wish to oppose it by acknowledging that I occasionally hire hookers.You said yourself that Ishtar/Gilgamesh worship exists through "credit masturbation" by acts or thoughts, so it would be logical that the antithetical principle has it's own form of credit masturbation.
"social media/Onlyfans" is indeed "a form of global Ishtar worship", no doubt, but holier-than-thou claims of "chastity" will do nothing to oppose it spiritually because it is not the act of sex itself that is the problem. It is sexual worship that is. When, at Church, a pastor's wife who looks like a supermodel is on display, even though she might be chaste, this is an act of sexual worship, even though no actual sex is involved. If you look at the most successful "tradwives" influencer channels (Lauren Chen and the like), you will see the same thing. Modern Christianity has lost its understanding of what constitutes idolatry, sexual or otherwise.
Replacing one idolatry with another would not solve his problem. Only replacing a false god(dess) with real transcendance would.
"holiness and chastity" is just the badge of another form of hero-worship. Tradwives are just as bitchy and scornful (behind the "holiness" smile) as the average Stacey. Indeed, they are Stacys and they pour scorn on poor dudes like the one here just as much as more openly sexual Ishtar priestesses. Don't be fooled. Athena (chaste) is just as much an avatar of Ishtar (unchaste) as any other. Banging hookers is just a way to show to yourself that you DO NOT worship women. Have you ever wondered why ALL WOMEN, both conservative and leftie, are incensed at the idea of prostitution and porn?
Fuck God
oy vey! this low key ruined my evening....
I've given up already. No rope for me though.
Stfu
What you gonna do about it Nazi?
Similar threads
Emba
RageFuel
8 PSL 198cm mogger CHAD being adored just for existing, AND HE IS TRYING TO SCAM INCELS!!!!
- lowz1r
- Inceldom Discussion
Da_Yunez
Users who are viewing this thread
