if im not mistaken america actually belonged to the natives originally but was invaded by the british. by the same logic, they should go back to britain.
JFL "go back to your country" by racist american SF'ers is a very low IQ argument
U
Go get 'em NoFap boy!
I'm not American you low IQ lobotomite. My post wasn't from a racist standpoint, it was from logical advice kind of standpoint. Every guy here with a brain has figured this out. Go reread the thread.
You have 10k posts and couldn't see that.
i already realised that after i made that comment on your thread.
The problem with this argument is that nobody actually uses it. Immigration restrictionists in the USA are usually arguing specifically against the immigration of Hispanics, not of all immigrants, and typically argue from an economic utilitarian persepective. This is particularly true when the immigrant group in question is hispanics, who are a larger net drain on the federal budget per capita, commit more crime, have a much lower IQ (approximately 89), and vote against freedom of expression, association, and enterprise more than the white natives of the United States.
This is a poor argument. There was no America before the Europeans settled.
To use an analogy, it's like kicking some guy living in a tent and building a big mansion where the tent was, and than have some guy argue that house doesn't belong to you because there was someone else living in that same spot before.
the europeans still invaded their homeland. it doesnt matter what they did with it. in reality the land belongs to the natives since they were the first to inhabit it.
yes it does.
No, it actually matters a great deal, especially in the context of other people barging in and taking advantage of something they had no role in building.
The natives were lazy fucks who did nothing useful with their land, by time we had built empires, they were still in nomadic tribes.
LMAOO
they were not the first to inhabit it, they slaughtered prehistorics. then.theybkept slaughtering each other for that land etc. then humans slaughtered moat of them (should have killles them all) and you bitches dare to whinge about it. pfff pathetic low iq shitskin
D
SF’ers are low IQ in general
Thats a legit argument. Its about the land. He's free to disassemble his house but he should leave regardless
Nomadic tribes are cool tho. They lived interesting warrior lifestyles. Americans ruined it just like they ruined the samurai and turned japs into nerds.
American native tribes does not exist anymore(or exist but are less than a minotiry)...Since Europe (Portogual, Brittish , Spanish etc) conquerd america it's the land for everybody. Every person has the same rights.
It's as much as white america as black america as latino america as whatever america. That's how i see it.
It's as much as white america as black america as latino america as whatever america. That's how i see it.
The land is irrelevant. What's on top of it is what matters. If you didn't build it, you have no right to it, end of argument.
If whites disassembled America, nobody would want to move there, which shows what immigrants are actually after, and it's not the land.
If whites disassembled America, nobody would want to move there, which shows what immigrants are actually after, and it's not the land.
Well, the Brits settled in America and built a massive, prosperous civilisation. The natives sat around all day around fires and built almost nothing.
Lol, I would have thought your white half would bring your IQ up at least a little bit. I suppose the one drop rule applies to IQ as well.
Native Americans were not one homogenous group. They were warring tribes that commited genocides against one another, just as every other group in history has done (or attempted to do) to their neighbors. The Native Americans were constantly taking land from one another up until Europeans started taking land from them. Since these tribes were nomadic, their claims to their land were backed up by nothing but force. A more powerful force beat them at their own game and then settled the land, just as they did in Africa (which fell apart once whites became a minority within the colonies).
Native Americans were not one homogenous group. They were warring tribes that commited genocides against one another, just as every other group in history has done (or attempted to do) to their neighbors. The Native Americans were constantly taking land from one another up until Europeans started taking land from them. Since these tribes were nomadic, their claims to their land were backed up by nothing but force. A more powerful force beat them at their own game and then settled the land, just as they did in Africa (which fell apart once whites became a minority within the colonies).
So why dont you go onto someones private property and pitch a tent then claim it as your own.
Who gives a shit whether people wanna move there or not. Europeans should never have gone there in the first place and started building crap since it wasnt their land to build in
America's not the piece of land, it's the socially-constructed nation-state which exists on top of that land, and it was founded by English-speaking whites. Nobody gives a fuck about the Indians, not even leftists who cry 24/7 about blacks, and they only started calling themselves American after they got cucked hard by the white man. Before they were Cherokee, Lakota, Najavo, whatever and proud of it, now they're a defeated people on reservations because of America (which is an other to them).
America's not really a white country anymore though, the country's WASP and Jewish elite let everyone in after Hart-Celler and the civil rights movement. A lot of poor American whites who don't stand to benefit from mass-migration are quite understandably angry at this, it doesn't really amount to much more than hot air and centre-right politicians winning though.
America's not really a white country anymore though, the country's WASP and Jewish elite let everyone in after Hart-Celler and the civil rights movement. A lot of poor American whites who don't stand to benefit from mass-migration are quite understandably angry at this, it doesn't really amount to much more than hot air and centre-right politicians winning though.
It matters because the only reason immigrants wanna go there is because of what Europeans build. The "immorality" of Europeans conquering the American Indians is just a way for them to justify taking white people's stuff.
It's the same argument people are using to justify blacks stealing the land owned by whites in south Africa. Except the blacks wouldn't care about that land if the whites hadn't build farms on top them, so much so that no blacks were living there in the first place when Europeans first settled there.
America is stolen Indian land
Non natives out
Non natives out
They are low iq because America needs these immigrants. Without these immigrants then Texas would not have the strong labor force that it has right now (if you cant find a job in Texas then you are mentally deficient). By the way, do you think our scholars are well off against those of other countries? You are wrong. Here is one of the best arguments for importing immigrant intellect:
Like a said white people can take their stuff with them when they leave. Problem solved. Then all the immigrants can follow you since you want them so bad.
Thats wrong. Blacks resisted whites before they even built farms which shows they never wanted them in their country.
Blacks rule south africa and its a black county. If the white farmers dont like it they can always go back to holland
There were no large black settlements in south Africa when the Dutch first settled, the blacks only came later, after the whites build their country. Leftists call this a "colonialist myth" but since we know that leftists are born liars they cannot be trusted on this.
But now that the blacks in south Africa have had their fill of communist garbage they think they are entitled to everything whites have build and once they take possession of it they gonna destroy all of it but hey, that's justice i guess, right?
But now that the blacks in south Africa have had their fill of communist garbage they think they are entitled to everything whites have build and once they take possession of it they gonna destroy all of it but hey, that's justice i guess, right?
2017cels once again proving that they are the biggest faggots on the site
i stand corrected, they werent the first but the point is america isnt the homeland of caucasians living there today. ad hominems dont prove your point btw. [/QUOTE]
Pretty much.
It's interesting how people on the internet constantly say all non-natives need to leave america, but never say that about any other country even though most countries are majority non-native.
Funny that you use the Japanese as an example when the Yayoi Japanese (~99 of the Japanese population) are an example of a population the displaced the natives. The Jomon were the natives, the Yayoi Japanese came thousands of years later, from eastern China.
Other examples include:
- French and British displaced the natives in Canada
- Indonesians and Malaysians displaced the native Orang Asli
- British displaced the australian aboriginals
- Most of China originally belonged to various other ethnic groups. The Han chinese are indigenous to a chunk of eastern china, and the rest was conquered
- Ethnic chinese displaced the indigenous Gaoshan in Taiwan
- Ethnic chinese displaced the indigenous population of Sinapore
- Most filipinos originally came from Malaysia and displaced the native negritos
- Russians displaced several ethnic groups, most notably Siberians
I've never once heard anyone say anything about non-natives having to leave any of those countries, but I hear people saying it about america constantly, particularly from butthurt europeans. Speaking of which....article 13 just got passed and now you Europeans can't even post memes.
Yeah...that's what this is about, isn't it? Frustrated with your countries turning into authoritarian dystopias, you're lashing on online against Americans.You can't even tell a remotely edge joke on social media, just ask dankula. He was arrested and convicted of a "hate crime" for a very obvious joke video of his dog doing a "nazi salute"
. Didn't you guys ban certain types of knives in the UK? And now you need a Loicense to access adult websites? And you Frenchmen, you can't even legally cold approach women without getting fined.
https://www.npr.org/2018/08/02/6348...assment-approving-hefty-fines-for-cat-callers
And if you get literally cucked, you can't even get a paternity test without going to prison:
https://www.ibdna.com/paternity-testing-ban-upheld-in-france/
And now other European countries are planning to follow suit. Jesus, can you Europeans do ANYTHING anymore?
"Europeans have much culture and 300 IQ." Yeah you gave a bunch of unelected oligarchs power to pass laws unilaterally. Brilliant move Europe! And don't ask us to save you again. We saved you from Germany twice already. This one's on you.
In b4 "muh stupid americans" "muh gun violence" "muh le 56 percent meme" "muh americans have no culture besides Mcdonalds" Yeah, at least we can say whatever the fuck we want.
USA:
Europe:
Last edited:
Pretty much.
It's interesting how people on the internet constantly say all non-natives need to leave america, but never say that about any other country even though most countries are majority non-native.
Funny that you use the Japanese as an example when the Yayoi Japanese (~99 of the Japanese population) are an example of a population the displaced the natives. The Jomon were the natives, the Yayoi Japanese came thousands of years later, from eastern China.
Other examples include:
- French and British displaced the natives in Canada
- Indonesians and Malaysians displaced the native Orang Asli
- British displaced the australian aboriginals
- Most of China originally belonged to various other ethnic groups. The Han chinese are indigenous to a chunk of eastern china, and the rest was conquered
- Ethnic chinese displaced the indigenous Gaoshan in Taiwan
- Ethnic chinese displaced the indigenous population of Sinapore
- Most filipinos originally came from Malaysia and displaced the native negritos
- Russians displaced several ethnic groups, most notably Siberians
I've never once heard anyone say anything about non-natives having to leave any of those countries, but I hear people saying it about america constantly, particularly from butthurt europeans. Speaking of which....article 13 just got passed and now you Europeans can't even post memes.
You can't even tell a remotely edge joke on social media, just ask dankula. He was arrested and convicted of a "hate crime" for a very obvious joke video of his dog doing a "nazi salute"
And you Frenchmen, you can't even legally cold approach women without getting fined.
https://www.npr.org/2018/08/02/6348...assment-approving-hefty-fines-for-cat-callers
And if you get literally cucked, you can't even get a paternity test without going to prison:
https://www.ibdna.com/paternity-testing-ban-upheld-in-france/
And now other European countries are planning to follow suit. Jesus, can you Europeans do ANYTHING anymore?
"Europeans have much culture and 300 IQ." Yeah you gave a bunch of unelected oligarchs power to pass laws unilaterally. Brilliant move Europe! And don't ask us to save you again. We saved you from Germany twice already. This one's on you.
In b4 "muh stupid americans" "muh gun violence" "muh le 56 percent meme" "muh americans have no culture besides Mcdonalds" Yeah, at least we can say whatever the fuck we want.
USA:
Europe:
Yeah but racially theres little difference between those cultures that you mentioned and the invaders. Only exceptions are canada and aus and the brits and french should go home from those countries.
Bigger point is none of those natives exist anymore. Native americans do.
Talking bout dankula you cant even jokingly say shit like "why didnt you molest her" without getting banned on this forum. In what world is that a serious discussion of illegal activites. Plus the rules state that you cant make threads about illegal discussion. Says nothing about posts. My warning level should be reduced
Last edited:
I feel for some of the Hispanic immigrants, however I feel the same way as you. Rampant, unchecked, and might I add illegal immigration does America no favors
So it's acceptable for one ethnic group to displace another if the invaders are racially similar? Not to mention that's not even remotely true. Slavs are very different from Siberians, who are much more similar to mongolians. The Jomon were not even asian, and were more similar to caucasoids, though were genetically unique from any existing europeans.
Astounding ignorance.
Siberians still exist.
Gaoshan still exist.
Australian aboriginals still exist.
Tibetans still exist.
Uygurs still exist.
We dont know what the jomon were but they dont exist so their irrelevant.
Uyghurs migrated from mongolia. I hope east turkestan becomes a country
Aboriginals should get their land back like i said.
I hope tibetans get independence.
I hope chechens, dagestanis, circassions, siberians all get independence
Same for these gaoshan fellows
The indian culture was actually supposed to be quite widespread with pyramid or mound buildings which still reside in some areas of the US but history as always is written by the winners so you have to make the indians look like savages to make the story of settlement seem less barbaric.
Massive difference between a privately hosted forum giving you a temp ban (or even permaban) and an authoritarian government having you arrested and prosecuted for it. If you're honestly claiming they're even remotely similar you're trolling or just hopeless. Also i'm not even the one who warned you.
Another issue with the whole "all non-natives in all countries need to go back to their homelands" argument is that it's not remotely feasible. In America alone there are 7 times the number of Irish-americans as the entire population of ireland. Canada has another 5 irish million. So you're talking about a country of less than 5 million taking in 40 million people. Logistically that's not remotely feasible.
That's just one example. Not to mention it would also mean a lot of countries would have to take in a large number of people who are very culturally different and wouldn't even speak the native language.
Not to mention, what about mixed race people. Where would they go?
And yet ur claiming some migration that occured thousands of years ago that displaced extinct peoples is comparable to white colonisation of native american land. Time to stop trolling!
Thats their problem to sort out not mine.
As for mixed race people they can choose.
F
America was stolen twice.
Once by the Anglo-whites
And once more by the superior Jewish race
Once by the Anglo-whites
And once more by the superior Jewish race
I can tell by the way you're complaining about Americans that you're european. Do you want a massive swarm of americans and canadians coming into your country just because their ancestry is from there from 8 generations ago?
And what if neither country their ancestry is from will take them in? You honestly think Asian countries would take in a bunch of hapas from America, Canada, etc most of whom are dramatically culturally different? And what about all the Asian Americans who are 3rd, 4th, etc. generation and don't have any cultural connection to their "homeland"? You honestly think Japan, Korea China etc. would just take them all in? Look at how few refugees those countries take in...
I would love for americans to come here. The more the merrier.
If neither country takes them in they should beg the natives. If the natives want to keep them they can stay under a native american government. Otherwise they should construct an artifical country in the ocean and move there
Similar threads
Rabbi Schneerson
Liu KANG
Users who are viewing this thread
