Giving females rights to choose their partner is like giving kids the right to choose/decide about something important and out of their competence.

[Deleted member 36342]

Females will choose a guy that they find attractive that not rarely beats them and disrespects them or will choose a rich betabuxxer that they're ofc. not attracted to and will just secretely (or not so) hate him. So what's the solution boyos?

 

[Intellau_Celistic]

You've heard of S.R.B and James Knott, yes?

 

[Deleted member 36342]

You've heard of S.R.B

Yeah, i've heard of your ex-crush many times here

 

[Intellau_Celistic]

Yeah, i've heard of your ex-crush many times here

Here's a much better tidbit:

Humans are not that different from wolves.

'In a wolf pack, the wolves will attack the omega wolf to assert their dominance, to relieve their stress, or to instigate play with other wolves...the omega wolf acts as a sort of a scapegoat for all the problems of other wolves, as a stress reliever that will help them overcome difficult...

incels.is

He "gestures" me towards friendship with Shay after "tasting" her body for several years.

 

[Restart80]

The solution is strict monogamy and promoting JBF, with a looksmatched man give-or-take.

 

[Remaincel]

Women will want the most aggressive guy and then complain about aggression

 

[Deleted member 36342]

The solution is strict monogamy

Yep

Women will want the most aggressive guy and then complain about aggression

Which is hilarious. They deserve it, even if they got killed by the tough "badass" "cool" dude that they lust after.

 

[BrettyBoy]

They should only be allowed to go for a man on their looks level.

 

[Deleted member 36342]

They should be allowed to go for a man on their looks level.

At best. Female hypergamy has to be banned by law.