They can't grasp Kishimoto wrote foid characters too well, unlike those two other authors of OP and Bleach who cannot stop shoehorning a cunt in every scene. JFL.
Last edited:
They can't grasp Kishimoto wrote foid characters too well, unlike those two other authors of OP and Bleach who cannot stop shoehorning a cunt in every scene. JFL.
I stopped caring about youtubers' opinions long time ago.
Its funny how people forget Sakura was a terrible person and even told Sasuke shes glad Narutos parents are dead (or something like that, its been a while).
Most women are horrible people, they can't even escape it in media. Once you start judging a foid's character by the same standard you judge a man's you realize how horrible, pathetic, uncaring, selfish, psychopathic, weak, unfunny, not smart and void of any honor they are. On top of just simply being not interesting (no unique hobbies or views or skills)
Like smn from here said, a toxic man is a man acting like a woman, and a toxic woman is just a woman acting like a woman. One thing I noticed about depictions of female characters in fiction is this - they almost follow this androgenous gender archetype, meaning they mix male and female traits together. I think they do that because they realize that depicting women realistically would make them seem incredibly evil and unlikable.
There is something about watching someones behavior on film, or reading it in text, that makes people able to see them more clearly. Like, lets say you talk to a person, bla bla bla and 30 minutes later you go home. Ok. But if you read that conversation again in text, you suddenly have all these questions - why did he say that, wtf did he mean?
This means that in real life, people can get away with tons more shit than a movie character can on screen or in a book. People are hyper analytical of fiction, so strong measures are taken to maintain suspension of disbelief. Almost every fictional woman is basically just a man with tits and pussy. They dont slander, gossip, they dont display the characteristic anti-male attitude all women have. They don't show the dualistic, two-tongued nature of women, where they are cunts and awful in one setting, but then put on some lipstick and larp it up at work or school.
Exceptions are movies/shows written by women for women, like "fleabag" or "You." These women are beloved by women who identify with the main character, who is often a total psycho. The same shows are hated by men. One example would be titanic. The foid in titanic is a monster. Her husband is saving her entire family from poverty and she still hates him and cheats with chad. Then she never fucking regrets it, dumps her husband, gets another buxxer and in the final shot, it shows her visting all the locations that remind her of chad WITH HER BUXXER BRUH (look at the photographs on her nightstand, its all the places that jack told her about like the rollercoaster). She is humiliating the buxxer, a foid fetish.
There is something about watching someones behavior on film, or reading it in text, that makes people able to see them more clearly. Like, lets say you talk to a person, bla bla bla and 30 minutes later you go home. Ok. But if you read that conversation again in text, you suddenly have all these questions - why did he say that, wtf did he mean?
This means that in real life, people can get away with tons more shit than a movie character can on screen or in a book. People are hyper analytical of fiction, so strong measures are taken to maintain suspension of disbelief. Almost every fictional woman is basically just a man with tits and pussy. They dont slander, gossip, they dont display the characteristic anti-male attitude all women have. They don't show the dualistic, two-tongued nature of women, where they are cunts and awful in one setting, but then put on some lipstick and larp it up at work or school.
Exceptions are movies/shows written by women for women, like "fleabag" or "You." These women are beloved by women who identify with the main character, who is often a total psycho. The same shows are hated by men. One example would be titanic. The foid in titanic is a monster. Her husband is saving her entire family from poverty and she still hates him and cheats with chad. Then she never fucking regrets it, dumps her husband, gets another buxxer and in the final shot, it shows her visting all the locations that remind her of chad WITH HER BUXXER BRUH (look at the photographs on her nightstand, its all the places that jack told her about like the rollercoaster). She is humiliating the buxxer, a foid fetish.
- what about her family? Did they just die poor?
- she has zero guilt about what she did
- she throws the necklace in the ocean, another massive selfish fuck you
- the entire movie, she just does everything FOR HERSELF "me me me me me me me"
Youtube video essayists are a cancer.
The pink haired foid is one of the most accurate depictions of women in anime. Total bitch who worships Chad and hates Naruto for being a sub 5 male.
Like smn from here said, a toxic man is a man acting like a woman, and a toxic woman is just a woman acting like a woman. One thing I noticed about depictions of female characters in fiction is this - they almost follow this androgenous gender archetype, meaning they mix male and female traits together. I think they do that because they realize that depicting women realistically would make them seem incredibly evil and unlikable.
There is something about watching someones behavior on film, or reading it in text, that makes people able to see them more clearly. Like, lets say you talk to a person, bla bla bla and 30 minutes later you go home. Ok. But if you read that conversation again in text, you suddenly have all these questions - why did he say that, wtf did he mean?
This means that in real life, people can get away with tons more shit than a movie character can on screen or in a book. People are hyper analytical of fiction, so strong measures are taken to maintain suspension of disbelief. Almost every fictional woman is basically just a man with tits and pussy. They dont slander, gossip, they dont display the characteristic anti-male attitude all women have. They don't show the dualistic, two-tongued nature of women, where they are cunts and awful in one setting, but then put on some lipstick and larp it up at work or school.
Exceptions are movies/shows written by women for women, like "fleabag" or "You." These women are beloved by women who identify with the main character, who is often a total psycho. The same shows are hated by men. One example would be titanic. The foid in titanic is a monster. Her husband is saving her entire family from poverty and she still hates him and cheats with chad. Then she never fucking regrets it, dumps her husband, gets another buxxer and in the final shot, it shows her visting all the locations that remind her of chad WITH HER BUXXER BRUH (look at the photographs on her nightstand, its all the places that jack told her about like the rollercoaster). She is humiliating the buxxer, a foid fetish.
- what about her family? Did they just die poor?
- she has zero guilt about what she did
- she throws the necklace in the ocean, another massive selfish fuck you
- the entire movie, she just does everything FOR HERSELF "me me me me me me me"
View attachment 1403351
Foids barely did anything in Naruto (or even bleach for that matter). They are not needed
Very good points man, yeah I've never seen anybody complain how horrible this bitch in titanic is, until this meme got big. See how contrary to what you said they wrote a foid character somewhat realistically yet it STILL took tens of years for (some, mostly manosphere chronically online dudes like us) people to catch up on her being a psycho whore.
Like smn from here said, a toxic man is a man acting like a woman, and a toxic woman is just a woman acting like a woman. One thing I noticed about depictions of female characters in fiction is this - they almost follow this androgenous gender archetype, meaning they mix male and female traits together. I think they do that because they realize that depicting women realistically would make them seem incredibly evil and unlikable.
There is something about watching someones behavior on film, or reading it in text, that makes people able to see them more clearly. Like, lets say you talk to a person, bla bla bla and 30 minutes later you go home. Ok. But if you read that conversation again in text, you suddenly have all these questions - why did he say that, wtf did he mean?
This means that in real life, people can get away with tons more shit than a movie character can on screen or in a book. People are hyper analytical of fiction, so strong measures are taken to maintain suspension of disbelief. Almost every fictional woman is basically just a man with tits and pussy. They dont slander, gossip, they dont display the characteristic anti-male attitude all women have. They don't show the dualistic, two-tongued nature of women, where they are cunts and awful in one setting, but then put on some lipstick and larp it up at work or school.
Exceptions are movies/shows written by women for women, like "fleabag" or "You." These women are beloved by women who identify with the main character, who is often a total psycho. The same shows are hated by men. One example would be titanic. The foid in titanic is a monster. Her husband is saving her entire family from poverty and she still hates him and cheats with chad. Then she never fucking regrets it, dumps her husband, gets another buxxer and in the final shot, it shows her visting all the locations that remind her of chad WITH HER BUXXER BRUH (look at the photographs on her nightstand, its all the places that jack told her about like the rollercoaster). She is humiliating the buxxer, a foid fetish.
- what about her family? Did they just die poor?
- she has zero guilt about what she did
- she throws the necklace in the ocean, another massive selfish fuck you
- the entire movie, she just does everything FOR HERSELF "me me me me me me me"
View attachment 1403351
Foids are allowed to be straight up selfish psychopaths in all their relationships and social interactions, and they're either not judged at all or excused (she has trauma/is on her period/is sad because of her bf or dad or patriarchy or some other male who's to blame blah blah). If this is not the absolute privilege I don't fucking know what is man...
Attachments
naruto is a manga that was made for boys, its a shounen, which literally translates to "young boy" ffs.
young boys don't want to read stories about strong, empowered foids.
young boys don't want to read stories about strong, empowered foids.
Cannot repeat this enough times; foids' psychotic nature, narcissism, and entitlement were unleashed when they started going to college in the early 70s, not when the online dating took off. The 80s and 90s are littered with movies celebrating this evil nature of foids. They just weren't that overt plus men weren't all that aware.
Even the le great directors, who are thought to have made movies mainly catered to men, from that era made these kinds of movies.
The Rain People by Francis Ford Coppola
A Passage to India by David Lean
Edit: When soys on twitter or reddit say, this movie or that movie would be considered woke rn, I unironically agree with them, and they should be considered woke for good reasons. Personally, I wouldn't even humor Eowyn from LOTR at this point. Such leniency for so long landed us in this shitter culturally, morally, and socially.
Last edited:
Normies have completely taken over anime. Time to bunker down with the classics.
Sakura was so fucking mean, lol. I wonder why naruto was so into her
Naruto Is a HTN, In the movie Naruto the last foids were simping for him and had multiple foids want to go on a date with him In other movies.
Naruto is just a blonde hair blue eyes white HTN who from a young age, the noodle whore Hinata wanted naruto's white cocku onry. JBW
Really good observation
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
