Blackpill Foids nature hypergamy,Eugenics which is worse?

[AdolfRizzler]

Foid s hypergamy nature is to get the best genes!

Hypergamy is worse than eugenics since if a man 6ft, blue eyes is considered perfect, and all men under that category will be made to not be able to have kids, also foids under a category as certain height,traits, small boobs, etc are made to be able to not make kids it s a perfect balance!

But now, they will expect perfect genes from the man even when her herself has shit genetics, so it s pointless to have only the men with perfect genes (tall etc) if she has that shit genes to pass and the kid will have it worse than the dad (shorter,uglier)

50 years ago 6ft was a giant, 10years 6ft was tall, 2025, 6ft is barely,barely the minimum if u have the face, tall starts from 6'3
Just like hamudi said the 7ft will become the old 6ft, then there will be the 7'8, the hypergamy of foids knows no limit, has no limit!

Look at some people from the past,attractive people if u show them in 2025 they are considered ugly, the 2025 chad, will be ugly for 2050, u need a terrachad with no flaw, perfect, perfect face!

The foids nature is much, much worse than eugenics, at eugenics it s only a small percentage of population, how much can it be?
But for the foids nature only 5% of earth population is good!

 

[Paladin]

Foids are hypergamy. That means they go above there level

 

[LastGerman]

A 50 years ago 6ft was a giant, 10years 6ft was tall

Even over 50 years ago 6 feet was something that was required:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LvGgYcpSi8U

@Pfosti110​

vor 7 Stunden
bro even then 6ft


This is why I use bare minimum requirement as a saying. It was always there. It is universal.

 

[AdolfRizzler]

Even over 50 years ago 6 feet was something that was required:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LvGgYcpSi8U

@Pfosti110​

vor 7 Stunden
bro even then 6ft


This is why I use bare minimum requirement as a saying. It was always there. It is universal.

So 6ft was always bare minimum, it s just that in 2025 they are back to their nature and require something like 6'5 or more

 

[Sovereign]

Foid s hypergamy nature is to get the best genes!

Hypergamy is worse than eugenics since if a man 6ft, blue eyes is considered perfect, and all men under that category will be made to not be able to have kids, also foids under a category as certain height,traits, small boobs, etc are made to be able to not make kids it s a perfect balance!

But now, they will expect perfect genes from the man even when her herself has shit genetics, so it s pointless to have only the men with perfect genes (tall etc) if she has that shit genes to pass and the kid will have it worse than the dad (shorter,uglier)

50 years ago 6ft was a giant, 10years 6ft was tall, 2025, 6ft is barely,barely the minimum if u have the face, tall starts from 6'3
Just like hamudi said the 7ft will become the old 6ft, then there will be the 7'8, the hypergamy of foids knows no limit, has no limit!

Look at some people from the past,attractive people if u show them in 2025 they are considered ugly, the 2025 chad, will be ugly for 2050, u need a terrachad with no flaw, perfect, perfect face!

The foids nature is much, much worse than eugenics, at eugenics it s only a small percentage of population, how much can it be?
But for the foids nature only 5% of earth population is good!

eugenics(n.)​

"doctrine of progress in evolution of the human race, race-culture," 1883, coined (along with adjective eugenic) by English scientist Francis Galton (1822-1911) on analogy of ethics, physics, etc. from Greek eugenēs "well-born, of good stock, of noble race," from eu- "good" (see eu-) + genos "birth" (from PIE root *gene- "give birth, beget").

The investigation of human eugenics, that is, of the conditions under which men of a high type are produced. [Galton, "Human Faculty," 1883]

hypogamy(n.)​

"marriage of a woman into a lower class, caste, or tribe," 1940, an anthropologist's word first used in an Indian context, from hypo- "under, beneath" + -gamy "marriage." Related: Hypogamous.

I don't understand your meaning of how one is worse then the other in the context that you use it in. Eugenics in practice would be taking a cow and a bull and having them mate to produce a certain offspring. Hypogamy is when a woman or someone of a lower caste date up within a hierarchy or of higher status.

I don't understand what you mean by the comparison of which is worse? If we look at the history of eugenics in history, Nazi Germany or in America, its forced sterilization or genocide of specific population. To get personal, if it were us in this context we would either be sterilized or exterminated in a concentration camp. Now in context of Hypergamy, a woman wanting only to marry or have children with a specific man of a certain stock is something that can effect you if in mass and society permits that behavior. In that case we would not be able to find a woman because they would deliberately say no to use because we do not meet their criteria.

In honesty, Hypergamy is something you can control (In part socially engineer), where as in eugenics you and I would be out right exterminated, so I say eugenics is worse.

 

[Scandi_Incel]

Even over 50 years ago 6 feet was something that was required:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LvGgYcpSi8U

@Pfosti110​

vor 7 Stunden
bro even then 6ft


This is why I use bare minimum requirement as a saying. It was always there. It is universal.

Women back than looked like garbage ngl

 

[AdolfRizzler]

Women back than looked like garbage ngl

yeah, honestly if i look in the past every foid then looked like some trans, small tits, no ass, man face, if i look now at foids even from the age of 14 they all look feminine big boobs and big ass, it might be because of all the estrogen and chemicals the kikes put it into our food and water

 

[Scandi_Incel]

yeah, honestly if i look in the past every foid then looked like some trans, small tits, no ass, man face, if i look now at foids even from the age of 14 they all look feminine big boobs and big ass, it might be because of all the estrogen and chemicals the kikes put it into our food and water

Thats very possible, and thoose estrogen and chemicals has made women look a lot prettier but at the cost of us men not developing the manly traits.

 

[WastedPotential]

Foid s hypergamy nature is to get the best genes!

Hypergamy is worse than eugenics since if a man 6ft, blue eyes is considered perfect, and all men under that category will be made to not be able to have kids, also foids under a category as certain height,traits, small boobs, etc are made to be able to not make kids it s a perfect balance!

But now, they will expect perfect genes from the man even when her herself has shit genetics, so it s pointless to have only the men with perfect genes (tall etc) if she has that shit genes to pass and the kid will have it worse than the dad (shorter,uglier)

50 years ago 6ft was a giant, 10years 6ft was tall, 2025, 6ft is barely,barely the minimum if u have the face, tall starts from 6'3
Just like hamudi said the 7ft will become the old 6ft, then there will be the 7'8, the hypergamy of foids knows no limit, has no limit!

Look at some people from the past,attractive people if u show them in 2025 they are considered ugly, the 2025 chad, will be ugly for 2050, u need a terrachad with no flaw, perfect, perfect face!

The foids nature is much, much worse than eugenics, at eugenics it s only a small percentage of population, how much can it be?
But for the foids nature only 5% of earth population is good!

It's both brutal but there's an argument for both.

Eugenics is worse, because I don't want the government to force sterilize me or force me into a lower class position or kill me.

Hypergamy is worse, because it's so innate in female AND male nature and culture that it's practically impossible right now to get rid of it.
Women don't settle for less, because they don't have to. Men will always simp.

 

[AdolfRizzler]

Women don't settle for less, because they don't have to. Men will always simp.

the pure hiroshima blackpill truth, nothing will change!

 

[Pikacel]

Even over 50 years ago 6 feet was something that was required:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LvGgYcpSi8U

@Pfosti110​

vor 7 Stunden
bro even then 6ft


This is why I use bare minimum requirement as a saying. It was always there. It is universal.

So ugly as well + shit personality

 

[Mixedcel59]

Women’s brand of “Eugenics” is Dysgenic.