Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum
Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.
Met a guy (34M) and was very attracted to him (was tall, fine, had long hair). He was nice to me at first, but when we got to his place and I said I didn’t wasn’t to sleep with him, he started being hostile, rude, and passive aggressive. I didn’t sleep with him, but I did regrettably went down on him. Didn’t think I could say no, cause I agreed to it earlier. He also passively told me he was abusive but said he was joking. He didn’t even have a condom and tried to fuck me without one, but I told him no.
It was really awkward and weird, but I left. I haven’t seen him since. When I told a friend of mine what happened, she said I shouldn’t feel bad because it was just for sex.She said I should feel lucky that someone as fine as him would want me sexually. She also mentioned that she would allow that disrespect if she was really down for just sex.
I don’t know how to feel about casual sex any more cause his weird behavior kinda traumatized me. My friend also made me feel like I shouldn’t have missed the opportunity because it’s just casual sex and that he was real fine.
I personally have never experienced this before, and I feel like it is my fault cause I did ask him out for drinks after he asked for my number. I honestly wish I never spoke to him in the first place, cause that experienced has ruined my experience with men and sex.
He straight-up told her he was abusive to her face and she still hooked up with him. In spite of this, IT will continue to claim that every single one of these guys is a master of deception and subterfuge.
He straight-up told her he was abusive to her face and she still hooked up with him. In spite of this, IT will continue to claim that every single one of these guys is a master of deception and subterfuge.
Most whores get the ick and ghost the Chad if he doesn't try to have sex with them at the right moment. This whore is retarded if she expected an experienced Chad to go slow with her.
@WorthlessSlavicShit
jfl at this case example for your ongoing rape investigation. Bitch literally suck this guy dick even though he shit on her and now claims she was traumatized
He straight-up told her he was abusive to her face and she still hooked up with him. In spite of this, IT will continue to claim that every single one of these guys is a master of deception and subterfuge.
The whole notion that 80 iq criminals are all collectively using advanced deception and psychological maneuvers to hide their real personality and manipulate women into loving them is funny as fuck
- @ShiiOfTheSPLC
"You don't understand inkwell:bluepill::foidSoy::bluepill:, women would happily avoid abusers if they could, it's just that those abusers are so good at hiding their tendencies, they act completely normal until they ensnare a woman and then show their true face:foidSoy::soy:." Nope. Not at all...
The whole notion that 80 iq criminals are all collectively using advanced deception and psychological maneuvers to hide their real personality and manipulate women into loving them is funny as fuck
- @ShiiOfTheSPLC
"You don't understand inkwell:bluepill::foidSoy::bluepill:, women would happily avoid abusers if they could, it's just that those abusers are so good at hiding their tendencies, they act completely normal until they ensnare a woman and then show their true face:foidSoy::soy:." Nope. Not at all...
The lengths people go to cope that "the world is fair" is nuts. In this case, they believe that these abusive guys 'put in the work' to be manipulative. When it's just their looks. Same with foids. Foids are manipulative and have "good social skills" largely because of their looks.
The lengths people go to cope that "the world is fair" is nuts. In this case, they believe that these abusive guys 'put in the work' to be manipulative. When it's just their looks. Same with foids. Foids are manipulative and have "good social skills" largely because of their looks.
manipulation always requires suspension of disbelief from the victim first. The manipulator has to induce suspension of disbelief somehow. Trust is such a tool. A gun lowers the level of disbelief into the possibility of dying. You can not manipulate if you dont have access or power to what you are trying to manipulate.
Even the word "manipulate" reflects this, as it comes from the latin word for hand - see the saying "manus manum lavat" - "one hand washes the other."
From the facts that
1. manipulation can only occur if the manipulator has power over the victim,
2. most men have no power over women socially
we can conclude that either women are lying about being manipulated - aka they chose the men they end up with and cry wolf later.
Or, the men that manipulate them somehow have leverage over them - aka they are chads.
Women have natural leverage over men, I think we dont need to elaborate on that. Both genders regard women as more trustworthy. This is also reflected in how women are treated in business. Contrary to popular belief, men in survey want more women to participate in business and speak up. Womens voices are not silenced at all, men are ultra willing to listen to foids and even demand it, as pardoxical as that sounds.
I recently had the opportunity to participate in the 2016 Catalyst Awards Conference in New York—an annual gathering of experts on inclusive leadership and promoting women in business. As I talked with attendees about my career and my advice for women advancing their own careers, I was struck by the
www.linkedin.com
Another thing is that back in the day, men were not opposed to giving women rights at all, contrary to popular belief. They actually only didnt give women total suffrage because they thought that as a result they would have to elevate other men as well. Because of intra-gender competition between low and high status men, they didnt want to do that:
And to quote from @WorthlessSlavicShit in my other thread:
Tfw it turns out the fight over women's right to vote was mostly an intra-female fight over how to best promote their in-group interests, not a fight over whether they should have a say in the first place.
This is based on quotes such as this from a 1800s foid he discovered:
One early believer in the idea was anti suffragist Catharine Beecher, who from the 1840s worked to open the teaching profession to women. Although she never joined an anti suffrage organization, Catharine Beecher was a dedicated anti, but at the same time she was also an indomitable campaigner for women’s education and economic equality. Her method of changing society was “first convincing intelligent and benevolent women that what I aimed at was right and desirable, and then securing their influence with their fathers, brothers, and husbands, and always with success” (italics added). Her fifty years of campaigning convinced her that all reasonable men “are not only willing but anxious to provide for the good of our sex. They will gladly bestow all that is just, reasonable, and kind, whenever we unite in asking” (italics added).39 The idea of women uniting for the common good, rather than dividing along party lines as men did, was a major theme of the women antis.
Another thing is that back in the day, men were not opposed to giving women rights at all, contrary to popular belief. They actually only didnt give women total suffrage because they thought that as a result they would have to elevate other men as well. Because of intra-gender competition between low and high status men, they didnt want to do that:
Yeah, sadly a different strategy arose from foids demanding their 'rights'. The men at the top instead decided to elevate foids. As a result, now we have the 'Office Harem' arrangement. Foids doing all the comfy bullshit work and men are either unemployed, doing long hours of stressful work, or relegated to manual labor. It's the ultimate form of foid-worshipping. These 'men' decided to rather let foids hog all the resources instead of sharing with their fellow lower-class men.
This is based on quotes such as this from a 1800s foid he discovered:
One early believer in the idea was anti suffragist Catharine Beecher, who from the 1840s worked to open the teaching profession to women. Although she never joined an anti suffrage organization, Catharine Beecher was a dedicated anti, but at the same time she was also an indomitable campaigner for women’s education and economic equality. Her method of changing society was “first convincing intelligent and benevolent women that what I aimed at was right and desirable, and then securing their influence with their fathers, brothers, and husbands, and always with success” (italics added). Her fifty years of campaigning convinced her that all reasonable men “are not only willing but anxious to provide for the good of our sex. They will gladly bestow all that is just, reasonable, and kind, whenever we unite in asking” (italics added).39 The idea of women uniting for the common good, rather than dividing along party lines as men did, was a major theme of the women antis.
I guess this started the cancerous parasitism of foids that we see today. This foid was rather interested in the fruits of the man-made safe world that started to ironically cancel man's physical advantage over foids that they leveraged to be the providers until then. That doesn't necessarily piss me off. It's the smugness, derision, and backstabbing in the form of extreme hypergamy that followed along with the continued villainization of men that do. So much so, that this quote is boiling my blood because this bitch didn't lay out her actual intention. They didn't unite to work at railway tracks despite good pay. They didn't unite to be seamstresses because a lot of foids were already making a living with it along with other lower-class jobs. Teachers, a job with little to no stress or supervision, of course. All the foids suddenly started uniting for comfy jobs like curries do when there is free stuff.
Despite all the shits internet gets for inflating foids' egos and entitlements, I have to thank it for putting a microscopic glass over each foid's every behavior and word they speak. Clearly, men of the past couldn't see through this foid that we can thanks to internet's exposure.
As an infamous youtube grifter aka Bo Refec used to say "You can't negotiate attraction." .
That sentence is the truth and pure black pill knowledge, but why do I call him a grifter?
It is because this dude is still selling people self improvement shit and tells basically incels to moneymaxx, geomaxx, statusmaxx.
Instead of repeating in every video that "You can't negotiate attraction
" he keeps on talking about gymcelling, moneymaxxing, hygienemaxxing and all that nonsense.
He claims that when the man is financially set and the foid doesn't have to take care of shit, naturally she will open up and be more feminine.
This bitch literally got treated like the trash that she obviousely is, and despite all her bs talk, she enjoyed it, else she wouldn't have sucked off that guy.
Does anyone else here wonder why bitches enjoy sucking off men so much? It's not like the mouth functions the same as a vagina.
There are no erogenous zones in it, afaik.
It is all about the thrill and submission to them, I guess.
Basically bitches love being dominated. Water is wet.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.