Blackpill Feminists contend that 'breasts are not sexual', yet touching breasts is a sex crime!

[Weston404]

[11] We disagree. In our view, the arbitrator’s decision under the second element of the William Scott test is unreasonable. In the arbitrator’s analysis of the contextual factors, she characterized what occurred as “lower end sexual harassment,” downplaying the seriousness of the misconduct. There can be no doubt that the grabbing and squeezing of another’s breast without consent is sexual assault. Sexual assault, by its very definition, is serious misconduct. Further, the arbitrator did not appropriately consider the employer’s position regarding safety in the workplace and the grievor’s dishonesty. Instead, the arbitrator focused on the circumstances of the grievor and irrelevant considerations, noting, for example, that the complainant did not appear to be traumatized in any significant way. This was not a proper analysis of the factors before her.

2019 ONSC 5877 (CanLII) | R. v. R.K. | CanLII

Access all information related to judgment R. v. R.K., 2019 ONSC 5877 (CanLII) on CanLII.

www.canlii.org

 

[Deleted member 18214]

Dude just touching a foids elbow is sexual these days so ofc breasts will also be.

 

[Weston404]

[9] The “inappropriate nude activities” included the Mother playing the “Booby Game” with the Children. The Booby Game involved the Mother, while they were all together naked, in her bed, placing the Children’s heads between her breasts and then gently hitting each side of their head with her breasts.
[10] The Booby Game actually started when the Mother and Father were still living together. The Father was in bed at the time the Booby Game was being played and he did not object to it. It should be remembered though that at the time they separated, the Children were still only 9, 6 and 5 years of age.
[11] However, after the separation, the Mother continued to play the Booby Game with her three Children.
[12] The Police and Ministry investigations concluded, that in addition to playing the Booby Game, the Mother would sometimes walk around the house in the nude and also, sometimes would have the Children in bed with her while they were all naked.
[13] The Police and Ministry Investigations both concluded that the Booby Game was still ongoing but were of the opinions that there was no sexual abuse and no sexual intent by the Mother with respect to the Booby Game nor with respect to the other episodes of nudity in the house.

 

[Saigon Depression]

[9] The “inappropriate nude activities” included the Mother playing the “Booby Game” with the Children. The Booby Game involved the Mother, while they were all together naked, in her bed, placing the Children’s heads between her breasts and then gently hitting each side of their head with her breasts.

I wish I'd had a mother like this.

 

[Barrix]

But for what reason outside of sexually would you want to touch a woman's breast without her permission? See that is why it's sexual, because there would be no other reason for doing so. That's the same as a woman touching a mans nipple without his consent, why would she do it if it were not sexual.

 

[Weston404]

But for what reason outside of sexually would you want to touch a woman's breast without her permission? See that is why it's sexual, because there would be no other reason for doing so. That's the same as a woman touching a mans nipple without his consent, why would she do it if it were not sexual.

Except that a foid touching a man's nipple isn't treated as 'sexual assault', cuck.

 

[Barrix]

Except that a foid touching a man's nipple isn't treated as 'sexual assault', cuck.

Yeah, but you get the point

 

[Weston404]

Yeah, but you get the point

The feminist whore can pose nude for her sons and play the Boobie game, and if she complains to Buzzfeed decades later that her sons touched her inappropriately while she was nude and putting her sons' wieners into each of her holes, who do you think will be labelled the sexual predator? The sons of course!

 

[Deleted member 7573]

Dude just touching a foids elbow is sexual these days so ofc breasts will also be.

If you are a incel, looking to a foid is sexual harassment, and you can search this is no joke, there are women who want to criminalize a man that look in a "inappropriate" way, in other words man who are not chads can't look to foids.

 

[Barrix]

The feminist whore can pose nude for her sons and play the Boobie game, and if she complains to Buzzfeed decades later that her sons touched her inappropriately while she was nude and putting her sons' wieners into each of her holes, who do you think will be labelled the sexual predator? The sons of course!

The thing is that over all feminism does not affect my life. I don't rage about it because feminism is not influencing me personally. It's like the moon, it's just there and glows sometimes but doesn't influence me outside of looking at it. I don't know any incident of which a mom blamed her son of "sexually harassing" and got away with it. Surely there will be people that question her decision of letting her son touch her breasts.

 

[Weston404]

The thing is that over all feminism does not affect my life.

Then why should we give a fuck, cuck?

If you are a incel, looking to a foid is sexual harassment, and you can search this is no joke, there are women who want to criminalize a man that look in a "inappropriate" way, in other words man who are not chads can't look to foids.

Alek Minassian did nothing wrong!

 

[Deleted member 20811]

If you are a incel, looking to a foid is sexual harassment, and you can search this is no joke, there are women who want to criminalize a man that look in a "inappropriate" way, in other words man who are not chads can't look to foids.

They would kill all incels if they could. They hate our existence.

 

[SchrodingersDick]

If breasts aren’t sexual, how come women get breast implants? Modifying your body (usually, barring people with 50 retarded piercings) is done to increase your own SMV and odds of attracting a higher value partner.

so either breasts are sexual and women leverage them for resources and sperm from men (thereby objectifying themselves), or Foids are operating pathologically, in which case they should be stripped of all their rights and thrown into asylums.

pick one, feminists.

classic retarded feminist logic.. b-but men also have nipples and they don’t have to cover them. Nipple = nipple. They’re the same thing! And men = women so what’s up with the double standards? (Hint: it’s eggs and their infinite value and power)

 

[Deleted member 4159]