
Draconian Times
ㅤ
★
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2023
- Posts
- 2,565
The majority of women are heterosexual. That much is true.
However, aside from being attracted to the opposite sex, what exactly is functional about women's sexuality?
Women's orgasms are largely a meme. No one knows if it exists or if it happens the way tell us. Either way, women don't need to ejaculate in order to have children unlike men, so it's useless anyhow.
Women are obsessed with humiliation. They enjoy being spanked and punched during sexual intercourse. Is there anything functional about that? Does that facilitate pregnancy or chances of survival? No, it's all fun and games.
Hypergamy goes without saying.
Technically, genetically superior males represent genetically superior offspring, so it makes sense to pursue them from an evolutionary perspective, but the vast majority of women don't have access to the highly attractive men they run after, so what's the point of fighting tooth and nail for men who won't commit?
What exactly is functional about rejecting a supporting man for an unloyal prick who will use her and dispose of her?
Which is why I don't believe that women know what they want, or that their sexuality is justified. Evolutionary sexuality makes sense in the case of men, not in the case of women.
Whoever decided to make women the gatekeepers of sex should be raped by a legion of demons.
However, aside from being attracted to the opposite sex, what exactly is functional about women's sexuality?
Women's orgasms are largely a meme. No one knows if it exists or if it happens the way tell us. Either way, women don't need to ejaculate in order to have children unlike men, so it's useless anyhow.
Women are obsessed with humiliation. They enjoy being spanked and punched during sexual intercourse. Is there anything functional about that? Does that facilitate pregnancy or chances of survival? No, it's all fun and games.
Hypergamy goes without saying.
Technically, genetically superior males represent genetically superior offspring, so it makes sense to pursue them from an evolutionary perspective, but the vast majority of women don't have access to the highly attractive men they run after, so what's the point of fighting tooth and nail for men who won't commit?
What exactly is functional about rejecting a supporting man for an unloyal prick who will use her and dispose of her?
Which is why I don't believe that women know what they want, or that their sexuality is justified. Evolutionary sexuality makes sense in the case of men, not in the case of women.
Whoever decided to make women the gatekeepers of sex should be raped by a legion of demons.