JFL Female journalist writes about the dogpill in a newspaper, forgets to refute any of the facts

[CrackingYs]

This stupid cunt tries to refute the dogpill by explaining what it is, showing quotes and pictures, explaining what mgtow and inceldom is, as if showing what the dogpill is, is itself evidence that the dogpill is wrong.

Except her dimunitive brainpower prevented her from realizing she didnt actually refute any dogpills at all.

Although the dogpill’s origins are murky, Mark believes it nestled in perfectly with the wider men’s backlash against female sexual liberation.

That's it. That's all they can come up with as a reason for why the dogpill is wrong. She forgot to actually do any journalism, and ask women themselves if they fuck their dogs, how many of them do and how much. Simply laying out the ideology and evidence and then coming up with a theory about incels does not prove the dogpill wrong. Complete fucking morons.

Dogpilling: the online theory that women are rejecting men to have sex with dogs

While not visible in mainstream internet spaces, dogpilling is a longstanding theory that is rapidly beginning to thrive.

www.newstatesman.com

 

[Gymcelled]

Because she doesn't need to refute it. Telling normies that this originates from "bad men" is all they need to hear to consider it as debunked

 

[Fancy Alcoholic]

There's nothing to refute here tho, it's just like trying to refute the sky is blue.

 

[Mecoja]

Dogpill is centuries older than internet, incels and mgtow

 

[FinnCel]

Because she doesn't need to refute it. Telling normies that this originates from "bad men" is all they need to hear to consider it as debunked

Women are incapable of doing logic

 

[GeordiLefort3]

Dogpill is so old it was carved into stone by the Ancient Egyptians

 

[Deleted member 22571]

Dogpill is so old it was carved into stone by the Ancient Egyptians