Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Discussion Female hypergamy is extremely exaggerated

Limitcel

Limitcel

Against life| 2/10 sedated freak
-
Joined
Jul 6, 2024
Posts
4,901
For example:

It is normal for a woman to feel attracted to a guy who has possessions, this would mean in natural terms a man who has a greater survival capacity, but female hypergamy exaggerates this for something like just wanting millionaire guys, CEOs

It is normal for a woman to like a strong guy who is capable of defending himself because in nature this is important and homo sapiens are extremely violent and tribalistic but female hypergamy exaggerates this to the point of hybristophilia, of Stockholm syndrome, of them feeling attracted to guys with a high chance of killing them

You can see this all the time, female hypergamy exaggerates attraction patterns to extremes while for men these things are just very easily ignoreable preferences.
I believe it is because men have a much larger testo and therefore a much larger libido, so they are satisfied by much less, while women need much more intense things to be satisfied.
 
It's still a problem
 
It also makes sense considering the biological differences between the genders. Women have always been the more selective gender.
 
I dont think its the testo what makes men easily satisfied im guessing its because its harder for men to reproduce so your brain is wired in a way so you dont get to picky and die in a war with out passing your genes on.

Woman arent like this cause when it comes to worst they just get raped when their side lose the war

of course these rape olympic happend more in the past and less in our age.
 
I dont think its the testo what makes men easily satisfied im guessing its because its harder for men to reproduce so your brain is wired in a way so you dont get to picky and die in a war with out passing your genes on.

Woman arent like this cause when it comes to worst they just get raped when their side lose the war

of course these rape olympic happend more in the past and less in our age.
Yeah like men can get multiple women pregnant in a year but a woman can only get pregnant by one man per year
 
Yeah like men can get multiple women pregnant in a year but a woman can only get pregnant by one man per year
I feel like thats why they want tall or strong ones be cause in the primal age they had to fight of animals and fight for food

In short woman are feral beings who have not caught up to the modern age.
 
It is normal for a woman to feel attracted to a guy who has possessions, this would mean in natural terms a man who has a greater survival capacity
It is normal for a woman to like a strong guy who is capable of defending himself because in nature this is important and homo sapiens are extremely violent and tribalistic
I've always been skeptical of this kind of evopsych reasoning. Case in point, if our modern-day behaviors are rooted in evolutionarily beneficial behaviors, then why is self-harm a thing? Not to mention, it's impossible to verify the validity of such claims.
 
I've always been skeptical of this kind of evopsych reasoning. Case in point, if our modern-day behaviors are rooted in evolutionarily beneficial behaviors, then why is self-harm a thing? Not to mention, it's impossible to verify the validity of such claims.
It's the best we've got
 
I've always been skeptical of this kind of evopsych reasoning. Case in point, if our modern-day behaviors are rooted in evolutionarily beneficial behaviors, then why is self-harm a thing? Not to mention, it's impossible to verify the validity of such claims.
Furthermore, why don't we rape and kill just like in the good old times? how come we can cherrypick the behaviors we should've left behind, since we now live in a 'civilized society', oh yeah, we can only justify those that favor women...
 
Fisherian Runaway
 
For example:

It is normal for a woman to feel attracted to a guy who has possessions, this would mean in natural terms a man who has a greater survival capacity, but female hypergamy exaggerates this for something like just wanting millionaire guys, CEOs

It is normal for a woman to like a strong guy who is capable of defending himself because in nature this is important and homo sapiens are extremely violent and tribalistic but female hypergamy exaggerates this to the point of hybristophilia, of Stockholm syndrome, of them feeling attracted to guys with a high chance of killing them

You can see this all the time, female hypergamy exaggerates attraction patterns to extremes while for men these things are just very easily ignoreable preferences.
I believe it is because men have a much larger testo and therefore a much larger libido, so they are satisfied by much less, while women need much more intense things to be satisfied.
It’s normal for men of any age to be attracted to young women yet men are shamed for it. There’s age of consent laws which should be lowered .
 
Furthermore, why don't we rape and kill just like in the good old times? how come we can cherrypick the behaviors we should've left behind, since we now live in a 'civilized society', oh yeah, we can only justify those that favor women...
Civilization requires we all play nice to some extent. To reap the benefits of civilization (one of which is technological progress) certain behaviors had to be repressed. Besides, I kinda like not having to fear for my life when walking in public. Civilized behaviors benefit men as well. Chastity is a civilized behavior. Just because Western youngsters aren't chaste anymore doesn't mean chastity ain't civilized.
 
It’s normal for men of any age to be attracted to young women yet men are shamed for it. There’s age of consent laws which should be lowered .
won't change shit for us
 
Civilization requires we all play nice to some extent. To reap the benefits of civilization (one of which is technological progress) certain behaviors had to be repressed. Besides, I kinda like not having to fear for my life when walking in public. Civilized behaviors benefit men as well. Chastity is a civilized behavior. Just because Western youngsters aren't chaste anymore doesn't mean chastity ain't civilized.
Chastity is cucked, only men who aren't accepted by the hypergamous structure of (((society))) believe in that shit, almost everyone in this forum, you and me included, would not cuck ourselves, we would AT LEAST, fuck our own wives on a regular basis (if we were chad in looks and had this ability), chastity and a lot of normie morality is for the mentally subhuman and weak goyim.
 
Chastity is cucked, only men who aren't accepted by the hypergamous structure of (((society))) believe in that shit, almost everyone in this forum, you and me included, would not cuck ourselves, we would AT LEAST, fuck our own wives on a regular basis (if we were chad in looks and had this ability), chastity and a lot of normie morality is for the mentally subhuman and weak goyim.
To some extent you're affirming my point. To all play nice together means to cater to the losers. Hypergamy is exactly the opposite of catering to the losers (us in this case).

PS by chastity I meant abstinence from fornication (aka not being promiscuous) rather than abstinence from all sexual intercourse.
 

Similar threads

L
Replies
43
Views
1K
Spaincel
Spaincel
AsianCarpCel
Replies
42
Views
747
curryboy420
curryboy420
I
Replies
16
Views
399
incel4life
I
Limitcel
Replies
8
Views
475
Chaircel
Chaircel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top