Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Based Feds: subhuman currymanlet LARPs as modelling agent, ascends with 16-year-old Stacy (text screenshots included)

If this forum is the kind, where people like this are defended, I'm outta here, and hope feds get all of you.

His only mistake is that he didn't have someone set to kill her per-arranged if he ever got arrested

That's what I would have done if I was black mailing a woman like this

I'd expect that she would go to the police at some point, so I'd have to have her killed shortly afterwards
Hope feds track you, and send you for a couple of years to do what your parents were unable to.
 
His only mistake is that he didn't have someone set to kill her per-arranged if he ever got arrested

That's what I would have done if I was black mailing a woman like this

I'd expect that she would go to the police at some point, so I'd have to have her killed shortly afterwards

Cope.
 
Hope feds track you, and send you for a couple of years to do what your parents were unable to.

Americas funding is truly being wasted if the Feds are tracking random virgins venting online rather than guns being run across the border lol

If this forum is the kind, where people like this are defended, I'm outta here, and hope feds get all of you.

You will surely be missed
 
legit the only way for a currycel to be able to ascend with a californian stacy. VIP or premium escorts? At most they're just eastern european 20ish women, not 16 yo all american gigastacy. What he got is something no subhumans can get even by paying
 
fuck this guy, he had a wife and 2 daughters. currycel gettin greedy.
 
there are no dark net murder for hire... its pure fantasy and scam. low IQ if you believe them exist.

Murder for hire isn't uncommon and certainly people offer it on the dark web but chances are its just scammers LARPing and quite frankly the people you would be "hiring" would be 3 fries short of a happy meal. Not the kind you really want killing for you.
 
Americas funding is truly being wasted if the Feds are tracking random virgins venting online rather than guns being run across the border lol
Unironically feds probably spend more time going after the easy targets like incels are considered to be instead of violent criminals.

Just like tax agencies go after the middle class people behind on their taxes more than rich people with offshore bank accounts blatantly flouting the rules but that are rich and powerful enough to get away with it.

You will surely be missed
:feelskek:
 
What a waste of time and a life, all for a bit of hole.
 
Just like tax agencies go after the middle class people behind on their taxes more than rich people with offshore bank accounts blatantly flouting the rules but that are rich and powerful enough to get away with it.

Well I get your point, but the rich people in this case aren't doing anything illegal, what they are doing is completely legal, so there's no reason to "go after" them. If I ever get rich enough I'm going to do the same shit too lol
 
So he only got prisoned because she was technically a minor? Deepak couldnt just fuck a hole a couple years older and would ahve got away with it.
 
What a waste of time and a life, all for a bit of hole.

He must have wrecked those holes though (I know I would have), they will always smell of curry :feelskek:
 
Well I get your point, but the rich people in this case aren't doing anything illegal, what they are doing is completely legal, so there's no reason to "go after" them. If I ever get rich enough I'm going to do the same shit too lol
But the thing is those loopholes rich people exploit is something they only get away with because they have enough money to get good lawyers to fight the charges in court, making it expensive for tax agencies to go after them.

It is still illegal in a way, they are just able to get away with it.

Once again the consistent theme is that the strong pick on the weak. The strong being the government and tax/collection agencies and the weak being the poorer middle class or below male that cannot afford a good enough lawyer to fight the charges of tax evasion in court.
 
But the thing is those loopholes rich people exploit is something they only get away with because they have enough money to get good lawyers to fight the charges in court, making it expensive for tax agencies to go after them.

No that's not how it works, they don't "get away" with anything, they have the money and connections to pursue avenues a poor person wouldn't

When you have your business located in a country that allows you to not pay US taxes, you didn't break the law and have lawyers who can help your skirt the law, you just literally aren't doing anything illegal

I think you need to look into these laws more, its not illegal, its just outside the means of poor people

JFL if you actually think anyone has enough money to stop the Federal Reserve from taking their shit legally, you could have 100 lawyers and they couldn't do shit, the law is the law, and they'll take it by force if needs be
 
No that's not how it works, they don't "get away" with anything, they have the money and connections to pursue avenues a poor person wouldn't

When you have your business located in a country that allows you to not pay US taxes, you didn't break the law and have lawyers who can help your skirt the law, you just literally aren't doing anything illegal
This is the loophole a lot of progressives try to close but obviously unsuccessfully.
It was a major point of contention if I remember right in the 2012 US election with Romney's offshore tax accounts and the controversy over him paying very little tax.

I think you need to look into these laws more, its not illegal, its just outside the means of poor people
But because it's outside the means of poor people, if poor people try the same thing but don't have enough money to successfully pull it off they are found to be doing something illegal and get penalized for it.

If you can get away doing something that you'd otherwise be punished for if you were caught or did it carelessly isn't your action still illegal?
The only difference is that you got away with it.



JFL if you actually think anyone has enough money to stop the Federal Reserve from taking their shit legally, you could have 100 lawyers and they couldn't do shit, the law is the law, and they'll take it by force if needs be
I meant that super rich people usually get away with tax evasion way easier than poorer people even though on the books the law is that tax evasion is illegal no matter what your income is.
Not that the super rich completely avoid having their assets seized if found to be in violation of tax law or that it's always a given that they'll get away with tax avoidance.
 
Kek and altrightcels think ethnic men have it easy. Look how desperate this man was. Poor guy
>ethnic men have it easy

i don't think that's White Supremacy
there are no dark net murder for hire... its pure fantasy and scam. low IQ if you believe them exist.
you either have to be in a mafia or gang to get a hitman squad, these things were popular in the 80's and 90's
 
Well I get your point, but the rich people in this case aren't doing anything illegal, what they are doing is completely legal, so there's no reason to "go after" them. If I ever get rich enough I'm going to do the same shit too lol
But the thing is those loopholes rich people exploit is something they only get away with because they have enough money to get good lawyers to fight the charges in court, making it expensive for tax agencies to go after them.

It is still illegal in a way, they are just able to get away with it.

Once again the consistent theme is that the strong pick on the weak. The strong being the government and tax/collection agencies and the weak being the poorer middle class or below male that cannot afford a good enough lawyer to fight the charges of tax evasion in court.
What they are doing are (generally) not illegal. It's a fine line between tax evasion and simply restructuring your assets.

That's why you get a good lawyer, a good accountant, a good advisor.
 
What they are doing are (generally) not illegal. It's a fine line between tax evasion and simply restructuring your assets.
I really don't get this tbh
What's the fine line?

To me it's more like both would be illegal but rich people can afford to flout some of the laws through loopholes that allow the rich to pay less taxes
@Gyros_Pretcel thoughts?

That's why you get a good lawyer, a good accountant, a good advisor.
Yeah but if you didn't have enough money to hire a good lawyer, good accountant and good advisor and instead didn't have a good lawyer, accountant or advisor you'd be penalized for illegal activity because your defense wouldn't be could enough.

Imo it's a quesiton of semantics and not worth getting into too much debate about but just because you can successfully challenge something in court with more money and resources at hand doesn't mean that what you did wasn't in violation of the law in some way. You just got away with it while poorer people that didn't have enough money and resources to fight the charges in court did not.
 
I really don't get this tbh
What's the fine line?

To me it's more like both would be illegal but rich people can afford to flout some of the laws through loopholes that allow the rich to pay less taxes
@Gyros_Pretcel thoughts?


Yeah but if you didn't have enough money to hire a good lawyer, good accountant and good advisor and instead didn't have a good lawyer, accountant or advisor you'd be penalized for illegal activity because your defense wouldn't be could enough.

Imo it's a quesiton of semantics and not worth getting into too much debate about but just because you can successfully challenge something in court with more money and resources at hand doesn't mean that what you did wasn't in violation of the law in some way. You just got away with it while poorer people that didn't have enough money and resources to fight the charges in court did not.

I don't think you get the point

Think of it like you own a building, and in order to add specific infrastructure that is "up to building code" you need a lawyer who specializes in those laws and you need the money to pay a specialized company to build it to the requirements so that you aren't violating any laws

Its not that they are doing anything illegal, its that THEY ARE THE ONLY ONES WHO CAN AFFORD TO DO IT THE LEGAL WAY

THE LEGAL WAY IS EXPENSIVE


I don't know how else to explain this, they aren't doing anything illegal, just like a building owner isn't doing anything illegal because they have more money than you to make the changes to their building that they want to, and you can't renovate your house in certain ways without getting a sanction because you want to do something quick, simple, easy and cheap

Its the same thing, just with taxes, the legal option is available to everyone WHO CAN AFFORD IT

Lastly nobody who can't afford it needs it, because you aren't being taxed much anyways. Rich people get taxed around 50% of their income, If I was losing 50% I'd use some tax loopholes too
 
If this forum is the kind, where people like this are defended, I'm outta here, and hope feds get all of you.


Hope feds track you, and send you for a couple of years to do what your parents were unable to.
Now I know why graycels are so untrusted especially you after august ones. Get out then you moralfag, you guys never last long this forum or get ban sooner or later.
 
I really don't get this tbh
What's the fine line?

To me it's more like both would be illegal but rich people can afford to flout some of the laws through loopholes that allow the rich to pay less taxes
@Gyros_Pretcel thoughts?


Yeah but if you didn't have enough money to hire a good lawyer, good accountant and good advisor and instead didn't have a good lawyer, accountant or advisor you'd be penalized for illegal activity because your defense wouldn't be could enough.

Imo it's a quesiton of semantics and not worth getting into too much debate about but just because you can successfully challenge something in court with more money and resources at hand doesn't mean that what you did wasn't in violation of the law in some way. You just got away with it while poorer people that didn't have enough money and resources to fight the charges in court did not.
This shit depends mostly on your local laws. Usually there is a loophole.

The big problem here in Germany is that to good people in the tax investigator bureau get mollathed. They are perpetually understaffed on purpose and mostly concentrate on small fish. Also there is no transparency at all.

Yeye hate the game not the player, but the big player own the workplaces and its workers (extortion with threat to social and financial destruction), the media, countless thinktanks, science, education, the bought off unions, the parliament through lobbying and individual polnigs through corruption. They are all a very tight nit club...

There is no other way to fix our shady system than socializing the assets, who are currently used for political influence taking. Money is speech and the normal people really don't have much to say...

Democracy with an uneducated people is worth dogshit.

We are all at the wim of the elites.
 
Last edited:
If this forum is the kind, where people like this are defended, I'm outta here, and hope feds get all of you.


Hope feds track you, and send you for a couple of years to do what your parents were unable to.

Ban this cuck
 
If this forum is the kind, where people like this are defended, I'm outta here, and hope feds get all of you.

Hope feds track you, and send you for a couple of years to do what your parents were unable to.

JFL
 
He got to see bobs and vegine!
 
also jfl at stacy suffering a mental breakdown because she had to have sex with a sub8 curry. That's the extent of foids' hate towards ethnic men.
bumping because bored
 
That doesn't even make sense, how is that even legal
That is legal. He was charged on four counts. The terms of the plea deal he took essentially said that if he pleaded guilty to counts 2 and 3, then the feds would withdraw 1 and 4.

The deal did not require the government to commit to any particular sentencing recommendation or to recommend an acceptance-of-responsibility reduction.

This is the conversation that happened between the judge and Deshpande while the agreement was being signed:

Court: Do you understand that the terms of this plea agreement are merely recommendations and that I could reject those recommendations and sentence you up to the maximum penalty without allowing you to withdraw your plea agreement once I accept your plea?

Deshpande: Yes, sir.

Court: Have you discussed the federal advisory sentencing guidelines with [counsel]?

Deshpande: Yes, sir.

Court: Do you understand that they will not be calculated until sentencing and that they’re not binding on the Court?

Deshpande: Yes, sir.

The maximum sentence for count 3 was life. He was sentenced to life. He was retarded.
 
The maximum sentence for count 3 was life. He was sentenced to life. He was retarded.
I would more say he had a shitty lawyer, why the hell would his lawyer let him take a deal like that, doesn't make sense . He probably just went along with it despite being warned because his lawyer made him think "everything will be fine" lol

I could never serve a life sentence though, I'm rushing the judge to kill him and then I'm killing myself after they add the judges death to my sentencing :feelskek:

If I lose my life, you lose yours too
 
I would more say he had a shitty lawyer, why the hell would his lawyer let him take a deal like that, doesn't make sense . He probably just went along with it despite being warned because his lawyer made him think "everything will be fine" lol

I could never serve a life sentence though, I'm rushing the judge to kill him and then I'm killing myself after they add the judges death to my sentencing :feelskek:

If I lose my life, you lose yours too
Yeah, he jumped from lawyer to lawyer for a while. Dude's desperate, filing motions from his prison cell. Just a few months ago the Supreme Court denied certiorari.

He was screwed though, he would've lost at trial. I mean it's one thing to have sex with a 16-year-old, it's another to extort a 16-year-old to have sex with you and record it. Sentencing guidelines recommended life though and from a legal standpoint, the judge didn't significantly depart above or below the guidelines, so I can't fault him.

AFAIC it is a reflection of how unusually punitive the American criminal justice system is compared to virtually any other Western democracy. Congress abolished parole in the 80s so if you get life in the federal system, it means life. Americans give out life sentences like it's candy.
 
Extremely based. Bookmarked thus thread tbh
 
By life parole you mean 15 years or 25 years? @PPEcel
 
without parole

life actually means life at the federal level
That's pretty harsh for child porn and enticement. Probably would have gotten a lighter sentence if he was white. Murderers get lighter sentences
 
That's pretty harsh for child porn and enticement. Probably would have gotten a lighter sentence if he was white. Murderers get lighter sentences
I mean it was a combination of the extortion, the multiple meetups, the duration of the case, and the fact that he tried to arrange a murder-for-hire for the Stacy after his arrest that jacked up his offense level in the sentencing guidelines.

The U.S. criminal justice system is stupidly harsh. 20-year sentence would've been sufficient to fulfill the purposes of deterrence.
 
The fuck are you guys talking about? He had a wife and two kids and was at the "highest social caste", this guy was obviously a sex haver and probably had more than his wife.
 
This is utterly pathetic, he threw away his entire life for something so worthless. If he really wanted to fuck a very attractive looking women, he could have just used a high end VIP escort service and considering he was "within the highest social caste of his culture" there should have been no problem affording them once and a while. Stupid moron deserves to rot in prison for the entirety of his life just because he's so damn stupid.
Based. This was really stupid on both ends. Why can't people just be smart? The world would be a better place. Oh, I know, because they are dumb!!!
 
The fuck are you guys talking about? He had a wife and two kids and was at the "highest social caste", this guy was obviously a sex haver and probably had more than his wife.
Even the "highest social caste" of curries are subhuman

The racepill is brutal
 
Murder for hire isn't uncommon and certainly people offer it on the dark web but chances are its just scammers LARPing and quite frankly the people you would be "hiring" would be 3 fries short of a happy meal. Not the kind you really want killing for you.
maybe a disguised FBI detective
 
Wow just wow.

There are tons of escorts in Vegas that are 18 to 23 years old. Now he just masturabtes in his cell with no porn to fap to, stuck in jail for the rest of his life. No pics of any whores or anything.

Can't make this shit up rofl.
 
What's the point of the plea deal if he's getting life without parole anyway
 
What's the point of the plea deal if he's getting life without parole anyway
He thought he was going to get away with a slap on the wrist lol

The deal was basically "plead guilty to two of the four charges and we'll drop the other two"

But one of the two charges he plead guilty to carried a maximum life sentence

Jfl
 
This shit sound like the last level of Indian scammer:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelsohh:
 

Similar threads

UglyVirgin
Replies
55
Views
3K
MRHK_57
MRHK_57
Esoteric7
Replies
11
Views
828
fedded
fedded
F
Replies
4
Views
238
Emba
Emba
Esoteric7
Replies
50
Views
2K
|R12|
|R12|

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top