I was reading a book on Medieval foid se*uality and I discovered that most medieval thinkers (Aquinas, Augustine, etc) thought of feamel se*uality as an irrational passion (hypersezual) vis-a-vis the rational and calm nature of the male: even there are some comedic stories that highlight the insatiable seccual nature of woeman impulses, such as the spouse that exclusively and lasciviously loved the penis of his husband, ignoring all of his qualities in the process.
I´ve always been impressed by this theory because in my experience hoeman tended to be hyposezual/asezual. I even thought that w*men were incapable of ever wanting seccs: they were beings devoid of eros, which propelled me to construct the idea that every sezual act with a women implied some kind of se*ual assault, harassment or rape. This was merely a false impression produced by my solipsistic nature, but the blackpill actually allowed me to think critically about the situation and I then realize that I was missing multiple theoretical possibilities and the role that intermediate relations have in affirming a certain statement.
The dilemma that I encountered while reading about foid sezuality was that between the hypersezual theory of the medievals and my personal experience with foid´s hypose*uality. I completely ignored that faemel heterose*uality is a mere ghost, an appearance. Rather, the W*men, as everyone knows, are chadsexuals. For instance, "bi" woeman have a dual nature not because they both have the conjunction of homo and l*sbian tendencies in their being, they´re "bi" because they are both chadsexual and lesbianic.
So their hypersexxxual nature is directed towards the Chad, while everyone else needs to suffer from the coldness of faemel hyposexxxuality.
I´ve always been impressed by this theory because in my experience hoeman tended to be hyposezual/asezual. I even thought that w*men were incapable of ever wanting seccs: they were beings devoid of eros, which propelled me to construct the idea that every sezual act with a women implied some kind of se*ual assault, harassment or rape. This was merely a false impression produced by my solipsistic nature, but the blackpill actually allowed me to think critically about the situation and I then realize that I was missing multiple theoretical possibilities and the role that intermediate relations have in affirming a certain statement.
The dilemma that I encountered while reading about foid sezuality was that between the hypersezual theory of the medievals and my personal experience with foid´s hypose*uality. I completely ignored that faemel heterose*uality is a mere ghost, an appearance. Rather, the W*men, as everyone knows, are chadsexuals. For instance, "bi" woeman have a dual nature not because they both have the conjunction of homo and l*sbian tendencies in their being, they´re "bi" because they are both chadsexual and lesbianic.
So their hypersexxxual nature is directed towards the Chad, while everyone else needs to suffer from the coldness of faemel hyposexxxuality.
Last edited:
