We call them landwhales. I call them porky bacons.
So, some time ago I did one of my many Tinder experiments. I made three accounts: a gigachad, a normal weight normie, and an obese sub5. The results were:
Chad got women thirsting over him, even when I was crass in my advances. I just asked blatantly, “Wanna fuck?” Women didn’t have a problem with it. But water is wet.
Normie got a few matches, but virtually all of them were fat. All of them.
Sub5 got nothing except two Instagram follower farmers.
Key takeaway: fat women don’t accept fat men, they want normal weight men. Seems like water is wet again, but let’s think about this some more. Bluepillers argue against the very notion of “looksmatch” because beauty is subjective, or so they claim. But BMI is very objective and scientific. If a fat woman is dating a normal man, they clearly aren’t looksmatched, as she has made a hypergamous climb. The important thing here is that fat women demand what they themselves lack, and they are being superficial in their selection, despite claiming the opposite.
When Tinder introduced the height filter, le based chuds were like, “Okay, what about a weight filter?” But even this “hot take” misses the point. Although a man’s height is a physical quality similar to a woman’s weight being a physical quality, there are two important differences. One, a man did not choose his height, a woman chose her weight by eating too much. Two, being short, in itself, is not a poor health marker, being overweight is.
All of that, and fat pigs just look awful.
So, some time ago I did one of my many Tinder experiments. I made three accounts: a gigachad, a normal weight normie, and an obese sub5. The results were:
Chad got women thirsting over him, even when I was crass in my advances. I just asked blatantly, “Wanna fuck?” Women didn’t have a problem with it. But water is wet.
Normie got a few matches, but virtually all of them were fat. All of them.
Sub5 got nothing except two Instagram follower farmers.
Key takeaway: fat women don’t accept fat men, they want normal weight men. Seems like water is wet again, but let’s think about this some more. Bluepillers argue against the very notion of “looksmatch” because beauty is subjective, or so they claim. But BMI is very objective and scientific. If a fat woman is dating a normal man, they clearly aren’t looksmatched, as she has made a hypergamous climb. The important thing here is that fat women demand what they themselves lack, and they are being superficial in their selection, despite claiming the opposite.
When Tinder introduced the height filter, le based chuds were like, “Okay, what about a weight filter?” But even this “hot take” misses the point. Although a man’s height is a physical quality similar to a woman’s weight being a physical quality, there are two important differences. One, a man did not choose his height, a woman chose her weight by eating too much. Two, being short, in itself, is not a poor health marker, being overweight is.
All of that, and fat pigs just look awful.
Last edited:
