Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

JFL "Failed normie" is literally the stupidest concept ever. Like WTF? You wanna be a normie NPC? "Failure" at not being a bluepilled norman is BAD?!

B

bonesmashing

There's no inhib-level for your face.
★★★
Joined
Oct 2, 2021
Posts
279
How do you become a "failed normie." WTF does that even mean? Do any of you even vaguely see your own logical inconsistencies at play here?

If you are a "failed normie" it's literally:

1. You blaming yourself that you could have "done better" but at the same time you will consider a normie "betabux material" & "better incel than cuck." So you're essentially mad that you couldn't be a betabux-type? Mad that low-value men have worked like slaves for peanuts & you missed out on that?

2. If you "failed" at doing something otherwise better than your current situation, then are you disregarding looks? The blackpill? Are you claiming you have the right looks but missing something else? Then what does this whole charade of male suffering and value mean to you if you're just like a normie or some other ideology in your head, but only lacks some other factor to supposedly make you become a "normie" then? I mean you gotta try and stick to your guns somewhat here/make sense of this all.

3. You are basically admitting that you could have or should have been something of a normie, which is to say that you'd sell all of us out if you managed to "get a girlfriend" or some shit? Is the blackpill really that conditional to you? Lookism gone? Everything you learned here gone? Sell everything out just to be a "normie" which we should all know here is a glorified, incel-tier looks guy usually at best?

So I literally do not get it. How can you be a "failed normie?" Are you admitting you have the looks but can't fit in because of your behavior? Admitting looks at your level aren't that much more valuable because you just want to "normie-fy" yourself in a host of non-looks ways, in theory? Don't tell me you "failed normies" are actually blue/redpilled Chadlites who are -- again -- AfRaId Of GuRLz!

LMAO

I -- for one -- never considered myself a "failed normie" because I NEVER wanted to have the normie label to begin wth. Normies have been the ones who have shat on me, bullied me, and opened my eyes up to the blackpill as a result of such. If I am a "failed normie" then THANK GOD -- I learned the truth and learned how it's all about MY LOOKS that determine my kind of life + that I'm not working like a slave to have "value" when I now know how I SHOULD BE VALUED as a man (through my looks mostly) -- and not following the bluepilled, incel-in-denial IT-like coping/grinding nature of the low-value loser with false hope. If you're happy for any cope way "out" then you never belonged here.
 
Last edited:
"Failed normie" is just a semi-incel. Don't be so picky about words. There's also "low tier normie" if you prefer.
 
"Failed normie" is just a semi-incel. Don't be so picky about words. There's also "low tier normie" if you prefer.

Listen closely to those words as you utter them ... "Failed Normie." "Failed" = didn't succeed. So you think this is something VALID? Why?

So one using this label for themselves or others implies they could have or should have been a normie. Why the fuck would any of us want to be a run-of-the-mill, mainstream, bluepilled or redpilled-ish at best type norman? I'm not saying being blackpilled means being a cave dweller loner, but still ... I get infiltrator or bluepilled vibes from those who use this as if it means, "Fuck! I should have sold my soul to the cog and buried the blackpill; instead I choose to rot on incel forums because of 'things' or somethin'" If you're blackpilled, why would you wanna be an NPC-cog?
 
Last edited:
Failed normie - had one girlfriend and then nothing for 10+ years. Not an incel strictly speaking but not a normie either.

Why the fuck would any of us want to be a run-of-the-mill, mainstream, bluepilled or redpilled-ish at best type norman?
Because normies have had sex hundreds of times?
 
So one using this label for themselves or others implies they could have or should have been a normie. Why the fuck would any of us want to be a run-of-the-mill, mainstream, bluepilled or redpilled-ish at best type norman?
Because it's better than being an incel?

Shit thread from a shit poster KYS
 
Listen closely to those words as you utter them ... "Failed Normie."

So one using this label for themselves or others implies they could have or should have been a normie. Why the fuck would any of us want to be a run-of-the-mill, mainstream, bluepilled or redpilled-ish at best type norman? I'm not saying being blackpilled means being a cave dweller loner, but still ... I got infiltrator or bluepilled vibes from those who use this as if it means, "Fuck! I should have sold my soul to the cog and buried the blackpill; instead I choose to rot on incel forums because of 'things' or somethin'" If you're blackpilled, why would you wanna be a giganormie NPC?
There are two meanings for the word "normie". The first one is a normie in terms of intests, beliefs, values, etc; in this sense, I fully agree with you, we shouldn't be normies. We shouldn't agree with feminism, betabuxx scam relationships passed as marriage nowadays, supporting all the evil mainstream shit of today, etc.

But "normie" is also used to describe someone's looks levels. A normie is basically an average-looking guy, not a Chad and not an incel (in terms of looks at least). In this sense, "failed normie" or "low tier normie" would be simply someone in the 4-5/10 range; slightly below average.
 
82398C07 5B67 46C7 8FCE 41ADC5F9B739
BDB2138A EFB4 4B1B A06E 2B415E3E3525
929F8713 D5B7 4B1D 8ADF D7191C6C5E06
 
Christ, someone is upset.
 
Because it's better than being an incel?

Shit thread from a shit poster KYS

Brilliant response from you as expected.

Also, your Cucksmax/Lookstard buddies LOVED my posts back on Lookism. Don't know if you lurked there mister iceman or not, but even the utmost biggest copers over there grew a liking toward my truthfulness of the blackpill & content (which is why I had a high post:rep ratio unlike some of the "based" posters who were treated like brilliant guys like you think you are, but had shittier reputation). Maybe over on Cucksmax you guys like to pretend you're temporarily embarrassed Chads more often, but not that it matters anyways because I know your looks & your story.
 
everyone puts people in boxes especially incels. You view it as being two boxes-- the chosen and unchosen which is more autist and incel. Others believe this is a spectrum :soy:
 
High IQ tbh

Failed Normie just seems like another term for low tier normie (4/10), except it is more vague. It's honestly a useless term. Or it's a term that some people will slap onto a guy that isn't sub4 but is non-NT.

Given how many males in the 4-6 range are virgins these days, it seems pretty silly to have a label for them. They're just incels tbh. Most young men are incels, or soon will be at this rate, anyway.
 
Last edited:
Failed normie means you have the advantages of a normie, like NT, average looks, medium-low inhib, but somehow you fucked up so bad that you didn't reap the rewards for those advantages. E.g. normies who have such a sense of entitlement that they are too demanding of others and narcissistic that they end up alone. Or they drink and smoke weed all day even though they are not socially excluded. Being a failed normie is like winning the lottery and spending it all in one day.
 
failed at career cucking and buxing a post wall whore :owo:
 
How do you become a "failed normie." WTF does that even mean? Do any of you even vaguely see your own logical inconsistencies at play here?

If you are a "failed normie" it's literally:

1. You blaming yourself that you could have "done better" but at the same time you will consider a normie "betabux material" & "better incel than cuck." So you're essentially mad that you couldn't be a betabux-type? Mad that low-value men have worked like slaves for peanuts & you missed out on that?

2. If you "failed" at doing something otherwise better than your current situation, then are you disregarding looks? The blackpill? Are you claiming you have the right looks but missing something else? Then what does this whole charade of male suffering and value mean to you if you're just like a normie or some other ideology in your head, but only lacks some other factor to supposedly make you become a "normie" then? I mean you gotta try and stick to your guns somewhat here/make sense of this all.

3. You are basically admitting that you could have or should have been something of a normie, which is to say that you'd sell all of us out if you managed to "get a girlfriend" or some shit? Is the blackpill really that conditional to you? Lookism gone? Everything you learned here gone? Sell everything out just to be a "normie" which we should all know here is a glorified, incel-tier looks guy usually at best?

So I literally do not get it. How can you be a "failed normie?" Are you admitting you have the looks but can't fit in because of your behavior? Admitting looks at your level aren't that much more valuable because you just want to "normie-fy" yourself in a host of non-looks ways, in theory? Don't tell me you "failed normies" are actually blue/redpilled Chadlites who are -- again -- AfRaId Of GuRLz!

LMAO

I -- for one -- never considered myself a "failed normie" because I NEVER wanted to have the normie label to begin wth. Normies have been the ones who have shat on me, bullied me, and opened my eyes up to the blackpill as a result of such. If I am a "failed normie" then THANK GOD -- I learned the truth and learned how it's all about MY LOOKS that determine my kind of life + that I'm not working like a slave to have "value" when I now know how I SHOULD BE VALUED as a man (through my looks mostly) -- and not following the bluepilled, incel-in-denial IT-like coping/grinding nature of the low-value loser with false hope. If you're happy for any cope way "out" then you never belonged here.
@Napoleon de Geso is a great example of a failed normie :bigbrain:


He got to enjoy sex in his physical prime early 20s with foids that ranged between the ages of 18- 24, but his only gripe was that as he got older, so did his option in foids so he began to feel entitled that he only deserved sex with 12 yr old JBs since he claims to have never gotten laid in his teen years :feelstastyman:
 
failed at career cucking and buxing a post wall whore :owo:

> bro 5/10 normans get gf, but gf will cheat with chad and he will have few/no options

> fuck, wish i had a single qt gf with my 5/10 looks but i am not NT brah


OR

> normies get cheated on constantly, normies only get 1 or 2 gfs max with effort

> fuck i wish i was able to ascend with gf but i am a failed-normie tbh


DO I have to spell out the inconsistencies here? We all should just be glad AT LEAST that we're (hopefully) more based than most normtards. At least being incel lets you see the flaws in the world & not let you be taken for a fool.
 
Last edited:
why are greycels always so fucking picky about who belongs or not :feelskek:
Listen closely to those words as you utter them ... "Failed Normie." "Failed" = didn't succeed. So you think this is something VALID? Why?

So one using this label for themselves or others implies they could have or should have been a normie. Why the fuck would any of us want to be a run-of-the-mill, mainstream, bluepilled or redpilled-ish at best type norman? I'm not saying being blackpilled means being a cave dweller loner, but still ... I get infiltrator or bluepilled vibes from those who use this as if it means, "Fuck! I should have sold my soul to the cog and buried the blackpill; instead I choose to rot on incel forums because of 'things' or somethin'" If you're blackpilled, why would you wanna be an NPC-cog?
coz at low tier/failed normie psl you can in fact ascend but failed to do so. nobody says you have to npcmax if you're ltn :feelskek: I don't particularly like or use the expression either but I don't have a pike in my ass about it :feelzez:
Betabuxxing (especially with divorce rape) is in itself a failure though. The biggest kind of fail.
no shit :feelswhat:
 
coz at low tier/failed normie psl you can in fact ascend

Define "ascend" here. Where, in what way, or how is a low-tier norman going to really "ascend" in life? By getting a single "gf" with effort?

Come on now. If that's ascension but the woman isn't even really that obviously in to you, you can argue that escortcelling on some level is "ascension" too. The problem is that uglier men WORK HARDER & tend to GET LESS. If that's the case, is it really "ascension" just because it's sex?

Okay, then hookers are ascension by that definition too as we often liken normies & their gfs -- usually, but not always -- to highly "transactional" relationships. Sure, not all guys have to really be the betabux stereotype just because sub-Chad, but it's a negative thing FOR A REASON.

Funny how some think it's "ascension" when a 4/10 works like a slave at everything to end up with 1 "girlfriend" or such. I mean I find the escortcels cucked too, but how can anyone say that the betabux norman stereotype's somehow more "valid" than the escortcel in that regard?
 
Last edited:
That's not what "failed normie" means, and you damn well know it. Stop being disingenuous.

This thread is a retarded failed normie take. :feelsjuice:
 
You can say you failed at the sexual life a normie woth your looks would have. Not necessarily fitting in with them or abandoning your beliefs.
everyone puts people in boxes especially incels. You view it as being two boxes-- the chosen and unchosen which is more autist and incel. Others believe this is a spectrum :soy:
 
@Napoleon de Geso is a great example of a failed normie :bigbrain:


He got to enjoy sex in his physical prime early 20s with foids that ranged between the ages of 18- 24, but his only gripe was that as he got older, so did his option in foids so he began to feel entitled that he only deserved sex with 12 yr old JBs since he claims to have never gotten laid in his teen years :feelstastyman:
If this is true I would beat this faggot to within an inch of his life.

EDIT: Lmao another faggot from Eastern Europe, the place were femcels exist and not incels what a surprise :feelshaha:
 
lol not going to read that. i had failed normies as friends, they weren't ugly outcasts that were made fun of but they weren't normie enough to go to parties as often as the average normie.
 
I'm low tier normie, I'm invisible to foids.
 
Define "ascend" here. Where, in what way, or how is a low-tier norman going to really "ascend" in life? By getting a single "gf" with effort?

Come on now. If that's ascension but the woman isn't even really that obviously in to you, you can argue that escortcelling on some level is "ascension" too. The problem is that uglier men WORK HARDER & tend to GET LESS. If that's the case, is it really "ascension" just because it's sex?

Okay, then hookers are ascension by that definition too as we often liken normies & their gfs -- usually, but not always -- to highly "transactional" relationships. Sure, not all guys have to really be the betabux stereotype just because sub-Chad, but it's a negative thing FOR A REASON.

Funny how some think it's "ascension" when a 4/10 works like a slave at everything to end up with 1 "girlfriend" or such. I mean I find the escortcels cucked too, but how can anyone say that the betabux norman stereotype's somehow more "valid" than the escortcel in that regard?
due to some weird coincidence a hole might fancy someone objectively below average if for example he resembles her father or favorite teacher in elementary school or whatever :feelsmage: or she's relatively subhuman and isn't in the popular stacy circle so she talks to you and some other subhuman holes and the stacies bully her and you get close. it doesn't happen often but it might. also unspoiled holes have usually lower standards so for example if you go to a holemaxed high school you might justbefirstmax and due to her relatively low exposure to other males you might just luck out and then be less likely to get cucked. ofc if it's a cucked relationship you gotta nuke it but there is true ascension for subchads. I do agree that for 95%+ of them it's over however
 
If this is true I would beat this faggot to within an inch of his life.

We all would like to kick his teeth in :society: anyone who sees right through his volcel bullshit.
EDIT: Lmao another faggot from Eastern Europe, the place were femcels exist and not incels what a surprise :feelshaha:
Make no mistake, he could be in a healthy relationship if he just did his part as a man.

But he doesn't, he wants to be a good for nothing manchild while being a petty little faggot that he cant get sex from 13 yr old virgins despite already being a typical normgroid that enjoyed a healthy sex life in his prime :feelstastyman:
 
So I literally do not get it. How can you be a "failed normie?"
A failed normie is a man who had (may be too old now) OR has the potential to be a normie and have a successful romantic life, but he put no effort into life to reach the bare minimum requirements he would have needed to do this. These guys want to cling to the label of "incel" to excuse themselves of any and all accountability and that's why they get called "failed normies".

The guy who literally never approached because "I'm shy" or "I'm high inhib"

The guy who was always fat from childhood to adulthood and never got down to an attractive weight so his jawline could even be seen

The guy who LDAR even though he has normie tier looks, so he can't even afford to date women, and will tell you that women should want to split the bill to date him :feelskek:

The Ultimate Cliche - 5'10"+ tall white guy who claims to be an incel but refuses to target ethnic women and doesn't even target asian women (the group statistically known to be obsessed with white guys) - THIS IS THE MOST COMMON TYPE OF "FAILED NORMIE" ON THE FORUM

Etc, etc, etc

The main defining thing is that they all have the potential to date and have romantic relationships, but they all have INSIGNIFICANT "hang ups" or "quirks" that they use as excuses.

IN ESSENCE, THEY ARE VOLCEL.
 

Similar threads

sinclair_silence
Replies
11
Views
182
Shrek
Shrek
damascus
Replies
18
Views
456
Thaway
Thaway
MisfitPerson
Replies
11
Views
600
SupremeGentleCel
S
Logic55
Replies
48
Views
894
Copexodius Maximus
Copexodius Maximus
cripplecel
Replies
26
Views
783
turbosperg
turbosperg

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top