Brutal Face is more important, but I think lack of height is seen as more of a genetic failure

[Nordicel94]

An ugly face is an ugly face. I don't think people consciously think "bad genes" as in "wow, his genetics failed to make his face handsome" when they walk past an ugly guy, it's more "wow, that's an ugly mf". If you walk past a guy who's 5'1 however, people go more "wow, he failed to grow, his genetics failed to make him a tall, manly man". I feel like there's almost a sense of blame against the short man for not being of at least average height.

May be a hot take, but that's something that struck me.

 

[nowiff]

Height is genes

Face is genetic recombination

 

[turbocuckcel_7000]

what is the takeaway here

 

[Starfish]

what is the takeaway here

food

 

[turbocuckcel_7000]

food

Poojeeted

 

[Friezacel]

Height is genes

Face is genetic recombination

There might be at least some truth to this

 

[nowiff]

There might be at least some truth to this

Yeah two attractive parents will not guarantee a facially aesthetic child as genetic recombination plays alot of factors in various features

However traits like height and frame are almost always accurate ( taller parents taller children )

 

[lazy_gamer_423]

Height is genes

Face is genetic recombination

 

[Julaybib]

ofc normies will see a short stature more of a genetic failure then an ugly face , but an ugly face is more genetic than height , height is also more influenced by epigenetics than face

 

[Julaybib]

Height is genes

+ epigenetics

 

[nowiff]

+ epigenetics

Agreed

 

[Freixel]

Yes, I think being 5'4 or under as a man is seen as a direct disability.

Normies are like "poor guy" if you start talking to them about a man of this height

 

[LOLI BREEDING]

when holes see a chadlet they say "it's a shame he isn't taller, it's a waste", when they see a tall subhuman, they recoil in disgust