Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Evidence for Oofy Doofy Theory: Face Ratings Are Very Flawed

Zer0/∞

Zer0/∞

Incelius Savage is The Godfather of Inceldom
★★★★★
Joined
Jul 23, 2021
Posts
24,413
Online time
11h 30m
Two very similar-looking faces who would be rated almost the same here yet be treated completely differently by women and people in general.
88b5611d683e5e950c5e3159b25eb9d8e9-30-trustworthy-faces.rsquare.w700.jpg

The face on the left is one most people would rate as untrustworthy; the face on the right is one most would say is trustworthy.

The first study presented data on an imaginary company to 609 people recruited through an online portal … They were asked to evaluate a decision made by the CEO to cut pay by 15 per cent for all staff (including the CEO himself) in order to avoid cut-backs in tough economic times. Participants felt more trust towards the CEO and judged the decision as fairer when the CEO’s biography included a facial photo previously rated as highly trustworthy rather than an untrustworthy one.

In the lead-up to this evaluation, participants were asked if there were other solutions to the financial crisis, and if so, if they could have been fairer. When they thought the CEO had a trustworthy face, they were less likely to believe there were fairer alternatives he could have taken. In both this and a subsequent replication, this doubt in viable alternative options mediated how strongly the photo drove trust in the CEO’s behaviour.
 
1st face is more masculine, gets more pussy
 
It's the same face just different expressions, are foids this retarded:feelskek:
 
Oofy doofy is law
 
Oofy doofy is cope unless you want to be a betq cuck
 
I have untrustworthy face :feelsrope:
 
almost the same here yet be treated completely differently by women and people in general.
The left one is not good looking enough to pull off slayer game. The right one can prettyboymaxx even though he's just a normie, you don't need top genes for it.
Zoomer whores love subhuman kpopmaxxed chinks while Changlites have it more difficult than those faggots,
at least in the West :society:

View: https://youtu.be/nAo_mZMIUgg


This why I don't like when people call kpopfags Changs, those fags are less masculine than real ching changs but slay much more. It is easier to prettyboy maxx nowadays, this just doesn't apply to rices.
Masculinity and high T only matters when you are 7+ and TALLLL
 
Last edited:
Two very similar-looking faces who would be rated almost the same here yet be treated completely differently by women and people in general.
88b5611d683e5e950c5e3159b25eb9d8e9-30-trustworthy-faces.rsquare.w700.jpg



They are not "flawed". They are influenced by culture.

That is why KPOP stars can be feminine as fuck and yet slay.

Culture influences biology
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top