Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

European ancestry populations at different times

W

WizardofSoda

Overlord
★★★★★
Joined
Aug 25, 2019
Posts
7,595
In Rome in the year 1 the population of Europe was estimated a 150 million, and they were farming basically all the land in Europe. In the next 1700 years they made zero progress in agricultural science so the farm output was still at 150 million as they already were using all the farmland back in the year 1.

If a generation is 25 years, that was 68 generations in those 1700 years where Europe's population was flat. Since each generation the better genetics people are likely to have more than 2 children and the shit genetics people less than 2 children, that was a huge amount of time for genetic improvement. Hence why Europe was this world conquering force by then.


Then the European race expanded very rapidly because of massive scientific advances leading to radically increased crop yields per acre and territorial expansion outside of Europe with vast amounts more farmland available. So by today I estimate there is ~1,050 million whites. I chose that as it is 7 times the 150 million in the year 1700. So in 12 generations we increased in number by 7 fold.

Mathematically that means not just the better genetics people were having more than 2 children and the bad genetics people less than 2 children. So the genetics crap was building up each generation and spreading across bloodlines. It also is an exponential process how the genetics crap spreads to formerly pristine bloodlines.


How to get out of this. Now it takes at minimum holding the population steady and allowing another 1700 years to gradually purge out the genetic crap and allow the genetic progress to spread. Realistically it needs a much more severe process, like women having even less than 2 children on average, and being Chad or at least rich normie or nothing. Which is of course what we see happening. And we see this happening on a global level as the super advances in science have spread around the world from Europe, and each place went through their population explosion.



One interesting trend is people are unhealthy garbage compared to their own ancestors a few generations back. And people have all these theories like the food we are eating, not getting enough exercise. But a probably bigger one is its all just genetics. As the shit garbage genetics spread throughout the population people are genetically inferior to their ancestors.

Its like why are Europeans getting so tall in many countries. Because women are so obsessed with choosing only taller men. Its not diet or some shit.
 
Last edited:
Its like why are Europeans getting so tall in many countries. Because women are so obsessed with choosing only taller men. Its not diet or some shit.
It's also sexual selection at play here when survival becomes too easy, the tall phenotype spreads by elimination of short men that fail to get a foid to reproduce offspring.
 
It's also sexual selection at play here when survival becomes too easy, the tall phenotype spreads by elimination of short men that fail to get a foid to reproduce offspring.

Ya even if all the women are having children, a tall man will have say 3 sets of children with 3 different women.. a normal height man a 50/50 chance of having children, and a manlet next to no chance.

I was watching videos of Ukrainians with the war fighting and the men looked taller than average. Because they were standing next to each other. But then when they got in normal size European brand cars, they were all ducking down and legs not fitting normally, with their heads against the ceiling even as they were crouched way over.

One bright spot.. hopefully taller men are bigger targets.
 
Last edited:
Too much to read
 
There is probably more than 1 billion whites.I would say its probably 1.2 billion whites.And if you count people with partial white ancestry its probably 1.5 billion(not saying these are white but just saying)
 
wtf is this shit man :what::what::what::what:

:feelshaha: you act all smart and shit in other posts like economics but man, you jump out of the shark in this one :feelshaha:

In year 1 europe was definately, 100% NOT farming all the land in Europe

and in the next 1700 years Europe made 0 progress in agro tech and science? where did you even learn such bullshit :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:

Mind you, the Netherlands been having windmill to get rid of marshland in medieval age. and also all other areas in europe too, to lesser extent.

Potatos were imported to europe from the Americas after the Spanish conquest, and greatly increased yields in land such as in Ireland, and to lesser extent in central europe and eastern europe too

and there was all those mass famines caused by war, and also genocided done by the gook tribes such as Huns and Mongols, who depopulated great swatch of eastern europe. In fact, modern day Ukraine was mostly empty coz of the savage gook tribes who never stopped raiding those places until the Russians were able to put a stop to it. So again, how can one claim Europe was farming all the land, when vast swath of eastern europe was almost totally empty due to gook savages?
:yes::yes::yes:
 
wtf is this shit man :what::what::what::what:

:feelshaha: you act all smart and shit in other posts like economics but man, you jump out of the shark in this one :feelshaha:

In year 1 europe was definately, 100% NOT farming all the land in Europe

and in the next 1700 years Europe made 0 progress in agro tech and science? where did you even learn such bullshit :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:

Mind you, the Netherlands been having windmill to get rid of marshland in medieval age. and also all other areas in europe too, to lesser extent.

Potatos were imported to europe from the Americas after the Spanish conquest, and greatly increased yields in land such as in Ireland, and to lesser extent in central europe and eastern europe too

and there was all those mass famines caused by war, and also genocided done by the gook tribes such as Huns and Mongols, who depopulated great swatch of eastern europe. In fact, modern day Ukraine was mostly empty coz of the savage gook tribes who never stopped raiding those places until the Russians were able to put a stop to it. So again, how can one claim Europe was farming all the land, when vast swath of eastern europe was almost totally empty due to gook savages?

that i can somewhat agree :fuk:

it's said being short as a man increase suicide chance dramatically. something like 500% or else (dont rememeber) :feelsohgod::feelsohgod::feelsohgod::feelsohgod::feelsohgod::feelsohgod:

that alone, in the medium and long run, would result in shift in height in a population :feelsbadman:

but the stupidity is of course it doesn't really improve the genes, as height is arguably one of the less important factor what made human civilization
Exactly. Add genetic engineering and designer babies, coupled with the racepill, and the future looks white.:blackpill::feelsstudy:
 
There is probably more than 1 billion whites.I would say its probably 1.2 billion whites.And if you count people with partial white ancestry its probably 1.5 billion(not saying these are white but just saying)
:blackpill:
 
Not going to read all of that but they definitely made progress on agriculture in that time period. There were inventions that aided them.
 
wtf is this shit man :what::what::what::what:

:feelshaha: you act all smart and shit in other posts like economics but man, you jump out of the shark in this one :feelshaha:

In year 1 europe was definately, 100% NOT farming all the land in Europe

and in the next 1700 years Europe made 0 progress in agro tech and science? where did you even learn such bullshit :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:

Mind you, the Netherlands been having windmill to get rid of marshland in medieval age. and also all other areas in europe too, to lesser extent.

Potatos were imported to europe from the Americas after the Spanish conquest, and greatly increased yields in land such as in Ireland, and to lesser extent in central europe and eastern europe too

and there was all those mass famines caused by war, and also genocided done by the gook tribes such as Huns and Mongols, who depopulated great swatch of eastern europe. In fact, modern day Ukraine was mostly empty coz of the savage gook tribes who never stopped raiding those places until the Russians were able to put a stop to it. So again, how can one claim Europe was farming all the land, when vast swath of eastern europe was almost totally empty due to gook savages?

Thanks I like to have my ideas challenged like that. I'm more looking at it on a statistical level. Like even if some areas faced large losses in population for various reasons.. the usual is just women over like 200 years have like 1.4 children each and the population craters. Other areas of Europe might have been increasing in population. Same with back in Rome there were areas not substantially populated then too.

If you look at potatoes the earliest possible time the Spanish could have got them was in 1492. Presumably it took some time before they got sent back to Spain. Then it would take a lot of time to proliferate in Europe, and then begin using potatoes in areas where it would increase yields. Because things spread slowly back then. Say it took 200 years from the Spanish discovery of the New World, to potatoes widely spread in Europe, then we are at 1700. So potatoes increasing the output of farms can be an additional non-science based factor.

The colossal rise imo was in the 1700's when they figured out proteins, carbohydrates, fats and it was protein that the grains were low on. So then by selective breeding they increased the protein content of grains by 3 times in one century. Which more or less allowed a tripling of population because the protein was the big limited factor. Also the grazing animals in fields of grains, they then were able to have 3 times more of them per acre. Once there was wide abundance of protein for most people in Europe it radically reduced the infant mortality and childhood illness death rate. Which even moving from 2 kids average to 2.5 causes rapid population growth.

The reason wars have not much impact on the population is as long as women and girls aren't being killed the birthrate isn't slowing down. Also there were major wars in the period 1700-2020 as well which killed large numbers but it didn't substantially slow down the population growth.

Another important aspect of the increased protein content in grains was it didn't take any longer to harvest the grains with higher protein content than the other varieties. So European countries were able to deploy more labor outside of farming.

So to look at the science and the limiting factor faced in Rome of the protein content of grains. What science advances were made from the year 1 to the year 1700 to increase the protein content. There may have been some but it seems it wasn't significant. Back before science and the industrial revolution things weren't that organized. Like Rome in the year 1 was probably more organized than Europe all the way until the 1700's. And the Romans didn't really have science for some reason. Before the 1700's nobody could have known which grains were higher in protein content.

The proof for all of this is the same malnutrition seen in Rome in the year 1, was still seen 1700 years later with next to no progress. Yet the same population in Europe in the year 1 and the year 1700. Therefore unless they were burning the surplus food and not telling anybody about it, the grain yields per acre and the land under cultivation must have been similar. But since 1700 there has been a clear decline in malnutrition that was on this trendline as the science advanced and the new grain varieties spread around Europe. Even as the population of Europe grew by like 5 times in the period 1700-2000.

This also leads into the whole vaccine scam. Because with rising nutrition of protein childhood illnesses were declining at the same time they began vaccinating, it gave the appearance that the vaccinations were working.
 
Last edited:
There is probably more than 1 billion whites.I would say its probably 1.2 billion whites.And if you count people with partial white ancestry its probably 1.5 billion(not saying these are white but just saying)
imo true whites (Nordics/Germanics/high tier anglo/french) are sub 200 million.
 

Similar threads

GeckoBus
Replies
116
Views
1K
GeckoBus
GeckoBus
ethniccel1
Replies
98
Views
2K
stalin22
stalin22
ethniccel1
Replies
17
Views
459
bcroger
B
AsiaCel
Replies
4
Views
125
glowIntheDark
glowIntheDark
AsiaCel
Replies
2
Views
146
AsiaCel
AsiaCel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top