Serious Escortcels Should Support the Nordic Model of Prostitution

[MENSA_IQcel]

@MENSA_IQcel sounds like a retarded middle schooler who read the first three chapters of an economics textbook and considers himself a genius. @BlkPillPres and @LittleBoy you shouldn't bother talking to a LARPing alt. This guy clearly isn't a PhD student.



Yes, that graph makes sense. That probably the 2nd or 3rd graph that a high school economics student will study. No, it is not an accurate model of the actual market for sex work; nor does it support your absurd policy proposal. 1 + 1 = 2 is correct, but this is the economics equivalent of saying "1+1=2, so therefore I have solved the Riemann hypothesis."


"it's impossible for cops to catch outcalls" JFL

Bro, you're mentally retaded. How would a cop catch an outcall when they can't bug the room? Cops can't send fake hookers to outcalls

So you're abdicating any reputable source for your argument knowing full well that you can't provide any backing you up & the only other ones are the ones that refute your supposition. Then you change the criteria for argumentation. O.K.

Drugs are part of the Black Market which is contraband alongside prostitution. Re-Read all of the articles I gave.

Punishing the Buyer is therefore dissuading one half of the transaction to go through. How is that not detrimental to us?

Scarcity increases price as a result of shortage of supply. Your quotes. Therefore when you deprive the purchase of sex by criminalizing that aspect you inadvertently increase the supply pricing scheme as the supplier knows that they are able to increase the price at will. Meaning an ever more hyper inflated SMV for females.

Fax Machine prices fell because they became redundant. Has nothing to do with deprivation of them.

Argument from authority - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Can you quote from one your books please Doctor?

'
Quoting a source is an argument of authority, yet that's exactly what you want me to do. You whine I don't have a source, and when i state i am the source, you scream "argument of a authority". And even so I gave you that graph which is universally accepted economic theory

All your other questions have been answered, there's no point of responding.

Low iq, legalizing means more competition and possibility for economies of scale (see the example another guy here gave with that german brothel). It's as easy as this; if what you said is true, the quality of prostitutes and escorts would be better in Sweden than in NL and Germany and it would cost less money for the same amount of time. Both statements are not the case.

Prostitution is cheaper in Germany is only cheaper because they have a bunch of girls from EAstern europe going there dingus.

 

[PPEcel]

Bro, you're mentally retaded. How would a cop catch an outcall when they can't bug the room? Cops can't send fake hookers to outcalls

They can, actually. They can send an undercover female cop with a wire, and the moment the guy hands over the money, her backup arrives and takes him down.

Bro, you're mentally retaded. How would a cop catch an outcall when they can't bug the room? Cops can't send fake hookers to outcalls


'
Quoting a source is an argument of authority, yet that's exactly what you want me to do. You whine I don't have a source, and when i state i am the source, you scream "argument of a authority". And even so I gave you that graph which is universally accepted economic theory

All your other questions have been answered, there's no point of responding.


Prostitution is cheaper in Germany is only cheaper because they have a bunch of girls from EAstern europe going there dingus.

Repeating the phrases "universally accepted economic theory" and "I am high IQ" ad nauseum isn't what a PhD student actually does.

 

[Deleted member 10124]

They can, actually. They can send an undercover female cop with a wire, and the moment the guy hands over the money, her backup arrives and takes him down.

Not to mention if you pick her up in the car then that's considered trafficking. Alongside taking her to your home in which she could call the cops & blackmail you etc etc.

Quoting a source is an argument of authority, yet that's exactly what you want me to do. You whine I don't have a source, and when i state i am the source, you scream "argument of a authority". And even so I gave you that graph which is universally accepted economic theory

All your other questions have been answered, there's no point of responding.

Why are you the source? What evidence proves you are the source? Where is your primary source documentation relating to the graph? Who has validated you to be the source? When the fuck are you going to stop wasting my time with your inane garbage?

 

[BlkPillPres]

They can, actually. They can send an undercover female cop with a wire, and the moment the guy hands over the money, her backup arrives and takes him down.

This guy does not live in real life, I don't think this guy even leaves his house, his sense of reality is like a child

What you just said is common sense, heck anybody who has seen even one season of a "true crime series" (like law and order) knows that it is a norm for undercover female police officers to bust johns like this

 

[PPEcel]

This guy does not live in real life, I don't think this guy even leaves his house, his sense of reality is like a child

What you just said is common sense, heck anybody who has seen even one season of a "true crime series" (like law and order) knows that it is a norm for undercover female police officers to bust johns like this

Tbh what the fuck is wrong with Americans? You guys have the worst of both worlds: degeneracy and traditionalist conservatism. Fucking waste of tax dollars.

 

[MENSA_IQcel]

This guy does not live in real life, I don't think this guy even leaves his house, his sense of reality is like a child

What you just said is common sense, heck anybody who has seen even one season of a "true crime series" (like law and order) knows that it is a norm for undercover female police officers to bust johns like this

They can, actually. They can send an undercover female cop with a wire, and the moment the guy hands over the money, her backup arrives and takes him down.


Repeating the phrases "universally accepted economic theory" and "I am high IQ" ad nauseum isn't what a PhD student actually does.

Police will never conduct outcall stings because if the John has a gun or gets violence it can hurt people in the neighboring rooms. Police always run their stings through incalls so it's a controlled environment and so they can make sure all the hotel rooms on the floor are empty.

And I have shown multiple times in this thread and explained why a decrease in demand will lead to lower prices. It really is just basic economic theory at this point. Less demand = lower prices.

 

[PPEcel]

Not to mention if you pick her up in the car then that's considered trafficking. Alongside taking her to your home in which she could call the cops & blackmail you etc etc.

I got into an escort's car once, I wonder if that's trafficking as well.

Police will never conduct outcall stings because if the John has a gun or gets violence it can hurt people in the neighboring rooms. Police always run their stings through incalls so it's a controlled environment and so they can make sure all the hotel rooms on the floor are empty.

JFL at thinking that the police give a shit about "people in the neighboring rooms".

No they don't. They're thugs looking for an excuse to use as much force as they can.

 

[Deleted member 10124]

I got into an escort's car once, I wonder if that's trafficking as well.

You weren't the one driving. She was.

Police will never conduct outcall stings because if the John has a gun or gets violence it can hurt people in the neighboring rooms. Police always run their stings through incalls so it's a controlled environment and so they can make sure all the hotel rooms on the floor are empty.

And I have shown multiple times in this thread and explained why a decrease in demand will lead to lower prices. It really is just basic economic theory at this point. Less demand = lower prices.

1. They'll cat fish you with fake pictures on the Internet.
2. They'll give you a bogus phone number
3. They'll give you an isolated area to go to.
4. They'll lie in wait for you to show up
5. The woman may approach being a glow nigger herself
6. Her partner in crime oops I mean glow nigger partner will then approach from the opposite side
7. Boom... Your BDSM game of being handcuffed & fucked... Just turned into being handcuffed, incarcerated & then fucked up the arse with a baton...

You really are stupid.

You have not provided any logical conclusion as to why lower demand will lead to lower pricing. You have not shown any economic theory to corrobate with that. You are an annoying LARPing Ban Evasion Alt Dear Sir.

 

[PPEcel]

And I have shown multiple times in this thread and explained why a decrease in demand will lead to lower prices. It really is just basic economic theory at this point. Less demand = lower prices.

And I have explained again and again that:

1) the price elasticity of supply of escorts in many countries is relatively elastic

2) your policy would shift the supply curve as well as the demand curve

3) criminalization of a market leads to information asymmetry, which invalidates the "perfect information" core assumption of the basic supply/demand model, and also increases the likelihood of market collapse

I blew everything you said out of the water.

You weren't the one driving. She was.

Luckily I don't live in the JewSA

 

[MENSA_IQcel]

And I have explained again and again that:

1) the price elasticity of supply of escorts in many countries is relatively elastic

2) your policy would shift the supply curve as well as the demand curve

3) criminalization of a market leads to information asymmetry, which invalidates the "perfect information" core assumption of the basic supply/demand model, and also increases the likelihood of market collapse

I blew everything you said out of the water.


Luckily I don't live in the JewSA

All your arguments militate the result of a price decline, but doesn't stop it. How do you explain that prostitution in Canada is 1/5 that of the United States?

 

[Deleted member 10124]

And I have explained again and again that:

1) the price elasticity of supply of escorts in many countries is relatively elastic

2) your policy would shift the supply curve as well as the demand curve

3) criminalization of a market leads to information asymmetry, which invalidates the "perfect information" core assumption of the basic supply/demand model, and also increases the likelihood of market collapse

I blew everything you said out of the water.


Luckily I don't live in the JewSA

Applies to the UK.

Brilliant answers. Shot for shot.

You going to answer this fool if he responds or allow someone else to?

 

[MENSA_IQcel]

You weren't the one driving. She was.



1. They'll cat fish you with fake pictures on the Internet.
2. They'll give you a bogus phone number
3. They'll give you an isolated area to go to.
4. They'll lie in wait for you to show up
5. The woman may approach being a glow nigger herself
6. Her partner in crime oops I mean glow nigger partner will then approach from the opposite side
7. Boom... Your BDSM game of being handcuffed & fucked... Just turned into being handcuffed, incarcerated & then fucked up the arse with a baton...

You really are stupid.

You have not provided any logical conclusion as to why lower demand will lead to lower pricing. You have not shown any economic theory to corrobate with that. You are an annoying LARPing Ban Evasion Alt Dear Sir.

You're so fucking retarded. You literally just described an INCALL not an outcall. Outcall means the hooker comes to you moron. At this point you're not worth responding to. I have proven multiple times with economic theory why lower demand = lower prices.

 

[PPEcel]

All your arguments militate the result of a price decline, but doesn't stop it. How do you explain that prostitution in Canada is 1/5 that of the United States?

Show us the data.

 

[Deleted member 10124]

All your arguments militate the result of a price decline, but doesn't stop it. How do you explain that prostitution in Canada is 1/5 that of the United States?

Because in the USA its illegal for both parties.

One cherry picked country doesn't invalidate an argument.

You're so fucking retarded. You literally just described an INCALL not an outcall. Outcall means the hooker comes to you moron. At this point you're not worth responding to. I have proven multiple times with economic theory why lower demand = lower prices.

No. That was an outcall. Where you & the Escort could meet on neutral territory first. Also if she comes to you... What makes you think she won't feel the need to blackmail you for extra dough.

No economic theory of yours was proven. See @PPEcel among other things for that.

 

[PPEcel]

Applies to the UK.

Brilliant answers. Shot for shot.

You going to answer this fool if he responds or allow someone else to?

I don't know, at this point I'm just toying with him, if he's a PhD student, then I'm a Victoria's Secret model.

 

[Deleted member 10124]

Show us the data.

He can't. He has none to show.

I don't know, at this point I'm just toying with him, if he's a PhD student, then I'm a Victoria's Secret model.

He is tenacious. I'll give him that.

 

[cucksaar]

The risk and punishment of getting caught is too big for your proposal to be valid OP.

 

[BlkPillPres]

Less demand = lower prices.

Making something illegal or legal doesn't lower or increase its demand (you are conflating concepts, conflating participation with demand)

The demand is based on the value of the product to the general consumer base, you are falsely conflating "people being scared to go to jail" with "decreased demand"

Its a ridiculous and disingenuous statement, its like holding a gun to someone's head and stating that you just helped "lower their demand" to hold onto their own money, what kind of retard tier argumentation is this?

Its like saying if you made food illegal people would just start being less hungry as if economic changes affects their biology through "economy magic", they'll just get food via other means, whether illegal or not, because their DESIRE (DEMAND) for food doesn't change

Making prostitution illegal doesn't kill off men's libidos, it won't affect demand at all, scared men will be pushed towards the black market, and the men too scared to venture there aren't fucking proof that demand was lowered, is just them being black mailed into submission

I don't think you realize how much of a sadistic feminist you sound like when you say:
"Oh, were just going to force some men into sexual starvation because they don't want to go to jail, see how that "lowers the demand" and increases the supply"

Decreased participation is NOT EQUAL to decreased demand, their desires still remain, they just don't want to get beaten or die in jail, the demand is still there, its just being suppressed

This is why I think you are troll, because you say shit that is OBVIOUSLY DISINGENUOUS and pretend as if you aren't aware of how disingenuous it is, because if you are as smart as you say you are, its obvious to you too

You have zero understanding of economics, ZERO, you need to get a refund on your PHD (that I doubt you even have)

 

[Deleted member 10124]

https://incels.is/threads/swedishcels-more-gtfih-sexkoepslagen-i-sverige.70440/

https://incels.is/threads/escortceller-potentially-jailed-in-uk.81573/

https://incels.is/threads/radical-f...ncels-inclusive-of-escortceller-copers.82151/

https://incels.is/threads/experimen...ht-in-what-sayeth-you-escortcels-gtfih.90705/

https://incels.is/threads/blackpill...ucker-the-blackpill-keeps-on-spreading.91447/

https://incels.is/threads/womans-sexual-liberation-magazine-backs-sex-buyer-law.160871/

https://incels.is/threads/bbc-2-sel...ruecel-in-a-sympathetic-light-no-less.170672/

https://incels.is/threads/the-femis...-transactional-sex-by-sub-8-non-chads.172680/

https://incels.is/threads/the-reasons-why-i-fight-against-femistazi-antiescortcelling.179551/

All the threads I've made. Relating to this.

 

[AutisticMonstrosity]

Cheapest I saw in Sweden is 150 (1500 kr)30 minutes, but the overall quality is shit there.
in Germany you can get better Hookers for 50 euros30 minutes. The Swedish model was in case of Sweden super effective to destroy the market and to make escortcelling unattractive.
France adopted a similar approach like Sweden, but the repercussions have been different.

Finland seems to be a little cheaper than Sweden, even though buying sex is totally legal in Finland. How this fits the theory @MENSA_IQcel ?

 

[I.N.C.E.L.S. Boss]

OP, you seem to not take variation into consideration.
If the supply falls too fast compared to the drop in demand, the price goes up, way up.

 

[MENSA_IQcel]

Finland seems to be a little cheaper than Sweden, even though buying sex is totally legal in Finland. How this fits the theory @MENSA_IQcel ?

Because Finland is a poorer country than Sweden

OP, you seem to not take variation into consideration.
If the supply falls too fast compared to the drop in demand, the price goes up, way up.

Criminalizing demand but not supply will cause demand to fall faster than supply

Making something illegal or legal doesn't lower or increase its demand (you are conflating concepts, conflating participation with demand)

The demand is based on the value of the product to the general consumer base, you are falsely conflating "people being scared to go to jail" with "decreased demand"

Its a ridiculous and disingenuous statement, its like holding a gun to someone's head and stating that you just helped "lower their demand" to hold onto their own money, what kind of retard tier argumentation is this?

Its like saying if you made food illegal people would just start being less hungry as if economic changes affects their biology through "economy magic", they'll just get food via other means, whether illegal or not, because their DESIRE (DEMAND) for food doesn't change

Making prostitution illegal doesn't kill off men's libidos, it won't affect demand at all, scared men will be pushed towards the black market, and the men too scared to venture there aren't fucking proof that demand was lowered, is just them being black mailed into submission

I don't think you realize how much of a sadistic feminist you sound like when you say:
"Oh, were just going to force some men into sexual starvation because they don't want to go to jail, see how that "lowers the demand" and increases the supply"

Decreased participation is NOT EQUAL to decreased demand, their desires still remain, they just don't want to get beaten or die in jail, the demand is still there, its just being suppressed

This is why I think you are troll, because you say shit that is OBVIOUSLY DISINGENUOUS and pretend as if you aren't aware of how disingenuous it is, because if you are as smart as you say you are, its obvious to you too

You have zero understanding of economics, ZERO, you need to get a refund on your PHD (that I doubt you even have)

The definition of demand is "Wants that can be backed up by purchasing power", it is entirely dependent on what people are WILLING TO SPEND MONEY ON which decreases when something is made illegal.

You have zero understanding of economics, you have zero understanding of history, you clearly don't understand the blackpill, don't understand socioology, don't understand the black-pill, can barely write properly, and make no logical sense in any arguments.

You're a great troll for getting away with this shit for so long. No one this stupid would last as long as you did on this forum.

The risk and punishment of getting caught is too big for your proposal to be valid OP.

The risk is 0

 

[BlkPillPres]

Criminalizing demand but not supply will cause demand to fall faster than supply

Except the demand doesn't fall, people just go to illegal outlets

Making something illegal doesn't stop demand, it changes the outlet, its that simple, your argument only makes sense if illegal markets don't exist

 

[Deleted member 10124]

Criminalizing demand but not supply will cause demand to fall faster than supply

The definition of demand is "Wants that can be backed up by purchasing power", it is entirely dependent on what people are WILLING TO SPEND MONEY ON which decreases when something is made illegal.

That graph that I gave regarding black market contraband disproved you.

Why are you allowed to use graphs but others can't?

What uni did you go to? That's not doxable info btw.

OP, you seem to not take variation into consideration.
If the supply falls too fast compared to the drop in demand, the price goes up, way up.

He's a LARPer.

 

[MENSA_IQcel]

That graph that I gave regarding black market contraband disproved you.

Why are you allowed to use graphs but others can't?

What uni did you go to? That's not doxable info btw.


He's a LARPer.

I'm convinced you're trolling me, you have to at this point. No point in responding.

Except the demand doesn't fall, people just go to illegal outlets

Making something illegal doesn't stop demand, it changes the outlet, its that simple, your argument only makes sense if illegal markets don't exist

The vast majority of clients of legal prostitution would stop doing it if it were illegal, there is NO denying that.

 

[Deleted member 10124]

I'm convinced you're trolling me, you have to at this point. No point in responding.


The vast majority of clients of legal prostitution would stop doing it if it were illegal, there is NO denying that.

So sayeth the troll LARPer. You can't respond because you've got fuck all ammo & arguments to go by.

So you admit that the vast majority would stop seeing prostitutes if the sex buyer law was brought in. Wrong. Northern Ireland has seen an increase in sex trafficking. Sweden only noted 1 area where sex trafficking went down. Pimps now set higher prices for "working girls" because they know they can get away with it. The escorts themselves can fleece law abiding Incel clients.

I'll indulge your little trolling games OP.

Ps. I'm no troll... I'm a happy hobbit.

 

[Pennywise]

Prostitution is a lame cope honestly. I would much rather save money and move to some third world slum where I am considered a prince amongst the heathens. Then I would take in the lowest of the low among the females. Borderline ugly, or even ugly females. I would take a 3/10 (my looksmaxx) in a poor village in Uttar Pradesh and make her understand that she is my servant. She would come to love me as her master, and I would come to love her as my subject. I wouldn't tell her that I loved her, though, until my dying breathe. I wouldn't be one of those "I love you I love you I love you" simps. I would not marry, at least not on paper, because then she has some leverage over you. Some day, when I get healthy again. I know that I am teracoping, but fuck, its a nice dream, isn't it? I've always lived in dirty hellholes like a dog in the first world, anyway. Why not live like the cousin of a drug lord in one of the poorest locations on the planet? The only way to have real sex without having STDs is mongamy. Enforced, strict, monogamy. Not letting her out of your sight mongamy. Complete control. Not sharing a toilet with every other John on the street. There's a reason they call them Port-a-johns. Disgusting filth.

 

[BlkPillPres]

Prostitution is a lame cope honestly. I would much rather save money and move to some third world slum where I am considered a prince amongst the heathens. Then I would take in the lowest of the low among the females. Borderline ugly, or even ugly females. I would take a 3/10 (my looksmaxx) in a poor village in Uttar Pradesh and make her understand that she is my servant

Dude that's still prostitution, just more long term, you are still providing a female with resources in trade for sex and companionship, I actually plan on trying what you just mentioned, but I'm not going as low as 3/10, 4.5 and extremely poor and uneducated is my minimum

Why the fuck would you waste your money on a 3

The escorts themselves can fleece law abiding Incel clients.

@MENSA_IQcel has no real life experience, and has never tried to pay for sex so simple things that would be apparent to escortcels never pops into his mind

The first thing anybody would think of is that whores and pimps (commanding the whores to do so) can now black mail clients who they believe they can "shake down" for extra cash, because what they are doing (selling) is legal and what the client is doing (buying) is illegal, so they can literally just take a picture of your face and report you and send it to the police if you don't pay up

His knowledge of economics for some reason does not take into account real life circumstances like corruption, black markets, etc

Who the hell would want to be in a position to be black mailed and what idiot would hail that as a positive (well we know which idiot)

 

[Pennywise]

Dude that's still prostitution, just more long term, you are still providing a female with resources in trade for sex and companionship, I actually plan on trying what you just mentioned, but I'm not going as low as 3/10, 4.5 and extremely poor and uneducated is my minimum

Why the fuck would you waste your money on a 3

It is in a sense, yes. I mean the most basic forms of prostitution are a bad cope, like the one nighters, or holiday/vaca girls, etc. I chose 3, or right, maybe a 4, just to keep her tame and in the house. That way she will realise her own disposition and dispensability. This will reduce the likelihood of her jumping bail on me and keep her at home. The worse mistake that most betabucks type characters can make is that they aim for these high-tier Stacies/Suhanisas. There's no way that you can keep a foid like that in line. She knows her SMV, and no matter how domineering you are, she will either emotionally destroy you, or jump bail. A foid with a low SMV, especially in a third world area, is much less likely to cause you those kinds of problems. Good to hear from you, and glad to see you back, BPP.

 

[BlkPillPres]

It is in a sense, yes. I mean the most basic forms of prostitution are a bad cope, like the one nighters, or holiday/vaca girls, etc. I chose 3, or right, maybe a 4, just to keep her tame and in the house. That way she will realise her own disposition and dispensability. This will reduce the likelihood of her jumping bail on me and keep her at home. The worse mistake that most betabucks type characters can make is that they aim for these high-tier Stacies/Suhanisas. There's no way that you can keep a foid like that in line. She knows her SMV, and no matter how domineering you are, she will either emotionally destroy you, or jump bail. A foid with a low SMV, especially in a third world area, is much less likely to cause you those kinds of problems. Good to hear from you, and glad to see you back, BPP.

If I'm going to settle for 3, I want two 3's, as im polygamy, I'd move to a country where I could do that where the women are poor and disinfranchized, I'd have both of them suck me off everyday at the same time (now that's a deal lol)

This is why I'd much rather move to an islamic state and get a child bride instead, I can get a young stacey tier female to basically raise to be my wife, and we'd live in a society where her faithfulness is enforced by threat of violence and/or death by all her peers (no worry about getting cucked)

I'd have no problem being cheated on after she's older and goes full foid, if I know the bitch gets stoned to death by her own family afterwards as an "honor killing", I can just start over again, she'd only be giving me a nice chance to "switch it up" and enjoy something new

I'd be like - "Mmmm look at Chaddam across the street, go ahead, I dare you, I have your father on speed dial, I'd like so much to get some new prime jail bait"

 

[Pennywise]

If I'm going to settle for 3, I want two 3's, as im polygamy, I'd move to a country where I could do that where the women are poor and disinfranchized, I'd have both of them suck me off everyday at the same time (now that's a deal lol)

This is why I'd much rather move to an islamic state and get a child bride instead, I can get a young stacey tier female to basically raise to be my wife, and we'd live in a society where her faithfulness is enforced by threat of violence and/or death by all her peers (no worry about getting cucked)

I'd have no problem being cheated on after she's older and goes full foid, if I know the bitch gets stoned to death by her own family afterwards as an "honor killing", I can just start over again, she'd only be giving me a nice chance to "switch it up" and enjoy something new

I'd be like - "Mmmm look at Chaddam across the street, go ahead, I dare you, I have your father on speed dial, I'd like so much to get some new prime jail bait"

Based and Prophet Muhammad-pilled

 

[Deleted member 10531]

That's the same as prostitution being illegal.

no it isnt, and whether you think there is some semantics reason for it, is irrelevant, as it doesn't produce the same results as it being illegal

1. Incels would be blackmailed
2. Incels would be extorted for money without having our physiological needs met
3. Incels would be shopped to the cops and made a persona non gratis
4. Incels would be treated worse than lepers all because we require a basic physiological need.

have sex or die trying

5. Faggots, Dykes & Leftist vermin would only succeed. Not us.

i guess then become a leftist if you think that would make you succeed. It's not like there are that many things separating us and leftists.

 

[>50IQcel]

Mensa IQ. More like subsuharan African iq

 

[BlkPillPres]

no it isnt, and whether you think there is some semantics reason for it, is irrelevant, as it doesn't produce the same results as it being illegal

Ok so if it was legal for teachers to teach, but illegal for students to learn, you'd still say that education was legal, and that the educational system was fully functional?

 

[Deleted member 10531]

Ok so if it was legal for teachers to teach, but illegal for students to learn, you'd still say that education was legal, and that the educational system was fully functional?

it doesnt need to be "fully functional", but it can still be useful for some students.

 

[BlkPillPres]

it doesnt need to be "fully functional"

If its not "fully functional" then it isn't really legal, you sound foolish trying to argue this semantic BS

Seriously apply this nonsense to work

Imagine if it was illegal to work but legal for employers to hire you, workers could easily just become slaves that make nothing because employers could just black mail them

Think of how retarded it sounds to say - "It can still be useful for some workers"

SOCIETY LITERALLY WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO FUNCTION

but it can still be useful for some students.

Those same students can be black mailed by teachers to pay extra tuition, teachers will start doing other corrupt things like charging for passing grades, etc, which means the educational system isn't functional at all because there's no way to tell how meritocratic it is, it will become more and more corrupt overtime until its completely unrecognizable to what it was and can't even be considered a "system"

I'm not continuing this argument you are too fucking stupid, I'm not arguing whether 1+1=2 this is ridiculous

 

[Deleted member 10531]

If its not "fully functional" then it isn't really legal, you sound foolish trying to argue this semantic BS

Seriously apply this nonsense to work

Imagine if it was illegal to work but legal for employers to hire you, workers could easily just become slaves that make nothing because employers could just black mail them

Think of how retarded it sounds to say - "It can still be useful for some workers"

SOCIETY LITERALLY WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO FUNCTION



Those same students can be black mailed by teachers to pay extra tuition, teachers will start doing other corrupt things like charging for passing grades, etc, which means the educational system isn't functional at all because there's no way to tell how meritocratic it is, it will become more and more corrupt overtime until its completely unrecognizable to what it was and can't even be considered a "system"

I'm not continuing this argument you are too fucking stupid, I'm not arguing whether 1+1=2 this is ridiculous

lol shut up cuck

 

[PPEcel]

Greycels say the darndest things

 

[MENSA_IQcel]

So sayeth the troll LARPer. You can't respond because you've got fuck all ammo & arguments to go by.

So you admit that the vast majority would stop seeing prostitutes if the sex buyer law was brought in. Wrong. Northern Ireland has seen an increase in sex trafficking. Sweden only noted 1 area where sex trafficking went down. Pimps now set higher prices for "working girls" because they know they can get away with it. The escorts themselves can fleece law abiding Incel clients.

I'll indulge your little trolling games OP.

Ps. I'm no troll... I'm a happy hobbit.

You're clearly trolling at this point, im not responding.

 

[PPEcel]

You're clearly trolling at this point, im not responding.

you just did

 

[Deleted member 10124]

Greycels say the darndest things

You're clearly trolling at this point, im not responding.

you just did

 

[FrothySolutions]

no it isnt, and whether you think there is some semantics reason for it, is irrelevant, as it doesn't produce the same results as it being illegal

But it does. Prostitution being illegal means I get arrested for seeking one out.

 

[Deleted member 17419]

Finland is a poorer country than Sweden

 

[Irishcel]

That is stupid. That's like arresting the drug user but letting the drug dealer go free. And what then is even the point of being a drug dealer if it's illegal for your customers to buy your drugs? And worst of all, how can we let a knowing and consenting drug dealer call themselves a victim of the customers they entrap?

Stupid. And we have people in this country who want to follow the examples of Nordic countries.

According to “radfems” all prostitutes are victims, even ones who weren’t trafficked. The funny thing is that this is a legal paternalistic view that basically says women are too stupid to make decisions for themselves, but they’re too retarded to realise that.

 

[MENSA_IQcel]

But it does. Prostitution being illegal means I get arrested for seeking one out.

Only low IQ people get arrested ngl, the stings are obvious

 

[FrothySolutions]

Only low IQ people get arrested ngl, the stings are obvious

Stings aren't the only way solicitors get arrested.

 

[PPEcel]

According to “radfems” all prostitutes are victims, even ones who weren’t trafficked. The funny thing is that this is a legal paternalistic view that basically says women are too stupid to make decisions for themselves, but they’re too retarded to realise that.

Yup, whores hate radfems.

There aren't a lot of jobs where someone with no higher education can earn six figs. They're not victims.

 

[MENSA_IQcel]

Stings aren't the only way solicitors get arrested.

How can soliciters get arrested without stings?

 

[FrothySolutions]

I don't know how the police do it, but they're always arresting johns for solicitation, as well as prostitutes for offering, all in the same roundup.

 

[MENSA_IQcel]

I don't know how the police do it, but they're always arresting johns for solicitation, as well as prostitutes for offering, all in the same roundup.

They're doing incall stings, it's impossible to sting an outcall