MENSA_IQcel
Banned
-
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2020
- Posts
- 1,171
We're addressing elasticity.
You're moving the goalposts.
Don't be stupid.
What stops the state from using the law to crack down on punters? I'd rather not take the risk. I love living in a country where the state pretty much turns a blind eye to the entire issue.
You haven't got anything to offer this forum other than your pseudointellectual sanctimonious moralfagging.
>We're addressing elasticity
Yes we are!!!!!!!
What I said directly relates to elasticity!!!!!!!!
Why are you playing this game?
Elasticity just refers to the percentage change in price relative to the percentage change in another factor, often times this is due to whether the supply is fixed. Oil is a perfect example, a decrease in demand for oil will decrease the price, sure there will then be less oil suppliers, but the supply of oil will drop less than the demand so overall price is lower.
Under your logic an increase in demand for oil would LOWER the price of oil because it would draw more oil suppliers into the market.
And the State can't crack down on punters because there's no way to do so without going after the most low IQ punters in existence, which are just retired idiot boomers. In fact it's impossible for police to set up a sting operation with an outcall, and the price of an outcall in Canada (country with Nordic model) is cheaper than an incall in the United States (full incrimination).