JFL Escortcel debate in fb

[Don Vito]

View: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=2019052191639266&set=gm.1296257261238210&idorvanity=947448799452393

Your father seeing you wasting 100 dollars in OnlyFans instead whores

1.
Just to remind you, as long as you continue to frequent places where "the loving ones" are, you put at risk the lives of many women and girls who are kidnapped and sexually exploited. Ah, but what am I saying, after all, they don't care as long as they put it true. They can answer what they want but there is no business without demand and they know very well where these girls are obtained.

2.
I worked in a whore house and the net that " poor girls in whore houses" is nonsense, poor are the fools who are going to leave their money there, girls live well and without fights (I clarify not all of them are the same and there are a lot of mafia and problems involved )

3.I keep thinking how the hell you spend on a only if you can go with them also I know a point where there are Europeans hahaha

4.How embarrassing to pay for sex, how pathetic is the only way they manage to get affection xd

Escortcel present:
not at all, but once you test it you find out what sex really is.
It's like trying free tap water vs purified water that costs.
There are exceptions but normally it is.

5.Imagine paying just to see photos or videos that will NEVER be yours (lit are only rented) when you have N free alternatives on the internet. How pathetic

 

[PLA1092]

Infuriating on both fronts that foids can make so much money off of exploiting desperate subhumans for the most part, but paying for something you can otherwise easily access is even more absurd; I wonder what level of foid-worshipping and induction into moral degeneracy you need to do such a thing...

JFL at claiming that the majority of those who do this work are "exploited" in a way that does not benefit them...

They have the benefit of hypergamy, every single globohomo-supporting corporation, white knighting cuck, and wealthy elite backing them and their degeneracy up, and unlimited amounts of statistics showing their halo'd treatment by most, especially in the legal system and relationships...

But subhuman truecels isolated in a state of permanent rotting and wageslaving/NEETing, genetically cursed from the beginning, and living a life of hopelessness are actually somebow better off due to the fact that the top 5% of men are more likely to earn more and live better lives; simply modern feminism and liberalism for you.

 

[ResidentHell]

1.
Just to remind you, as long as you continue to frequent places where "the loving ones" are, you put at risk the lives of many women and girls who are kidnapped and sexually exploited. Ah, but what am I saying, after all, they don't care as long as they put it true. They can answer what they want but there is no business without demand and they know very well where these girls are obtained.

Sex work is the oldest profession in history. Research has shown many "victims of sex trafficking" choose to be voluntarily trafficked in favour of access to better economic opportunities compared to their previous life situation, which was likely in a third-world country with poorer living standards and economically worse prospectives

2.
I worked in a whore house and the net that " poor girls in whore houses" is nonsense, poor are the fools who are going to leave their money there, girls live well and without fights (I clarify not all of them are the same and there are a lot of mafia and problems involved )

If you are wealthmaxxed or a wageslave who knows how to manage their finances, you'll probably not become poor from frequenting whores for paid sex. Also many sex workers in Western countries have a high income. When you charge $100 p/h for a service that's constantly in high demand, its unlikely you will be "poor" in this field of work

4.How embarrassing to pay for sex, how pathetic is the only way they manage to get affection xd

Basically all cultured methods of obtaining sex involve a payment or expense of resources of some sort (e.g. betabux, exploitation of social or economic capital, transfer of high-value genetics). The concept of free sex is a myth. The only true way to obtain "free sex", is either by accident or without consent.

Also ordinary females are almost identical to occupational whores in practice. They have sex at nearly the same frequency, and they tend to have interest in the finances and economic resources of their male partners. On top of the fact that the vast majority of divorces / break-ups are caused by females, financial difficulty / financial disagreement is the NUMBER ONE contributing factor to divorce

Also "affection" is bluepilled cope. Love and sex are two seperate things. You don't have to want "love" or "affection" from someone in order to be sexually attracted to them. As regard to evolutionary survival instinct, females are not really mentally capable of "loving" someone for only their "personality" and "character". They can only be really attracted to males with high-value genetics (e.g. face, height, whiteness or clear skin). Research from recent years that have shown increasing hypergamic activity in a globalized, freely accessible hookup / dating market, is direct evidence of this female biological condition

5.Imagine paying just to see photos or videos that will NEVER be yours (lit are only rented) when you have N free alternatives on the internet. How pathetic

Agreed that it is very cucked to pay a whore for only pictures and videos. However it is less cucked to pay a whore for physical sexual service, than to pay a whore for virtual / online sexual service

 

[Mulattocel]

Sex work is the oldest profession in history. Research has shown many "victims of sex trafficking" choose to be voluntarily trafficked in favour of access to better economic opportunities compared to their previous life situation, which was likely in a third-world country with poorer living standards and economically worse prospectives



If you are wealthmaxxed or a wageslave who knows how to manage their finances, you'll probably not become poor from frequenting whores for paid sex. Also many sex workers in Western countries have a high income. When you charge $100 p/h for a service that's constantly in high demand, its unlikely you will be "poor" in this field of work


Basically all cultured methods of obtaining sex involve a payment or expense of resources of some sort (e.g. betabux, exploitation of social or economic capital, transfer of high-value genetics). The concept of free sex is a myth. The only true way to obtain "free sex", is either by accident or without consent.

Also ordinary females are nearly identical to occupational whores in practice. They have sex at nearly the same frequency, and they tend to have interest in the finances and economic resources of their male partners. On top of the fact that the vast majority of divorces / break-ups are caused by females, financial difficulty / financial disagreement is the NUMBER ONE contributing factor to divorce

Also "affection" is bluepilled cope. Love and sex are two seperate things. You don't have to want "love" or "affection" from someone in order to be sexually attracted to them. Due to evolutionary survival instinct, females are not really mentally capable of "loving" someone for only their "personality" and "character". They can only be really attracted to males with high-value genetics (e.g. face, height, whiteness or clear skin). Research from recent years that have shown increasing hypergamic activity in a globalized, freely accessible hookup / dating market, is direct evidence of this female biological condition


Agreed that it is very cucked to pay a whore for only pictures and videos. However it is less cucked to pay a whore for physical sexual service, than to pay a whore for virtual / online sexual service

Good scientific reply brocel