So as to hurt the status of the Beckies.
escort-celling in our context is useless but you should still support the mainstreaming of prostitution
I believe that prostitution should be legalized everywhere.
W
Same
It would be nice to be able to escortcel occasionally without the risk.
L
It should be illegal everywhere, supporting prostitution = female worship
Sex should be available to men, as far as I know, feminists want to ban prostitution, so that there would be more cucks and betabucks
Maybe the other way around? Each woman will have her own price, you will no longer have to pursue her, just pay her.
This
this. I really don't like the idea of females getting paid a lot of money for doing unskilled work that doesn't require much effort.
What mental gymnastics are you using where purchasing a woman like an object is female worship?
I guess the sex trafficking market is female worship too, feminists must love that shit lol.
If you can't get past your ego to pay for sex then just say that, but don't use mental gymnastics to rationalize you cucking yourself into a lifetime of sex starvation.
Men have always been buying and selling women.
It's "useless" to you maybe, I get a lot of use out of it.
That would be the best possible thing to happen for men as it would reshape the dating market and put some leverage on the male side. Women can't leverage their pussy as much when sex is that easily available.
Last edited:
It would only be in our favor. That's right!
I agree; I'm not an escortcel (yet?) but widespread legal prostitution is good for all incels in the long term. This sums up what I think about it:
M
They already get paid a lot in form of betabuxxing and lonely guys studying for years at unis.
We cant change the demand in the market since it comes from biology, but we can increase the supply, thus reduce the price.
L
Prostitute sex is not sex, you need to use a condom on a whore that's taken 500 dicks, not like the real thing at all
Paying for escorts is giga cucked and roastie worship
Whats wrong with having an ego? Should I be a good little goyim cuck without any ego?
[UWSL]Just decriminalized, as legalization means they can tax it[/UWSL]
Pussy cartel
The pussy cartel refers to women's artificially inflating the value of sex via price-fixing. It is relatively easy for women to artificially inflate the value...
That's your opinion.
B
The market will stabilize the value of pussy.
All those points apply to decriminalization.Pussy cartel
The pussy cartel refers to women's artificially inflating the value of sex via price-fixing. It is relatively easy for women to artificially inflate the value...incels.wiki
That's your opinion.
Honestly, idk what you understand by decriminalization (since the meaning vary from country to country), but I'm just saying that prostitution should receive no punishment and that prostitution shouldn't be regulated by the government
L
All of them are loose and require a condom, jfl at calling that an opinion
Better to pay her family.
Personally I like sex with prostitutes, you may have a different opinion about it, there's no point in arguing about it, but as for others, it's better to have sex like that, rather than not having sex at all.
L
Both are cucked, you should not need to pay some roastie for sex neither her family
Ten cows, 3 pigs and 2 roosters.
It is sex, sex is sex, you're just letting your ego create some arbitrary standard.
Your mental hangups don't warp reality and determine whether or not a biological process took place.
Your statement is as retarded as saying you can't lose your virginity if you pay for sex, and by that logic if a woman only ever paid for sex she could get ran through in all her holes by 100+ Chad male escorts and she's still be a virgin afterwards.
You are forming your opinion based on emotions not logic.
Mental concepts don't dictate biological reality.
Sex = sexual intercourse, not "I feel validated" + sexual intercourse.
1. You don't need to use a condom at all brothels.
2. The amount of dicks a woman has taken makes no difference if you are just trying to fuck her, it only matters if you are trying to "make her yours".
3. Any number higher that ZERO is a subjective and arbitrary standard when it comes to sex partners.
[Hard To Swallow Edition] More Than Zero Sexual Partners Equals A Whore (Any Other Value Is Arbitrary)
I often see many users making these illogical arbitrary claims about which number of sexual partners makes a woman a whore, and all the pointless exceptions they have that make a woman eligible for marriage. Virgin is the only choice, saying any other number is just arbitrary, any guy saying 1...
incels.is
Which woman would you feel safer marrying:
Both are of the same age, race, attractiveness level, etc.
Woman A: 500 sex partners that were all 5ft tall, average faced and had 4 inch penises.
Woman B: 1 sex partner that was 6'5" tall, Chad face, and a 9 inch penis.
If we go by your logic, Woman B is your best bet of having a long lasting marriage without infidelity.
You guys forget that quality matters too, quantity isn't the only factor. In fact quantity only matters because it increases the likelihood that a woman will encounter a quality sex partner.
"Real" sex is sexual intercourse, not whatever personal definition you came up with that revolves around your ego.
By your logic every man in the far past that ever paid a "bride price" to a father to get his daughter never got "real sex".
Every man that bought a slave to be one of his wives never got "real sex".
So you, some random loser fuck in the future, somehow thinks your "modern standards" are superior to the standards of the men in the past whose masculinity dwarfs yours?
This is the problem with adhering to a modern standard of masculinity, you are adhering to "feminized masculinity". Men in the past didn't care about a woman's consent or attraction, you are projecting your modern standards onto the entire history of our species, all you have to do is look back at the past and you'll see that it's you that has the wrong standards.
[Hard To Swallow Edition] The Greatest Trick Society Ever Pulled Was Convincing Men To Adhere To A Feminized Standard Of Masculinity & Be Proud Of It
Ever heard of this quote: "The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn’t exist" Well here's the thing, society has basically done this to men, and many men (ironically even so called "black pilled" incels) don't seem to be aware of this. Even though its right in...
incels.is
Your response to this thread is what's wrong. Your ego blinds you from looking at things logically and instead you have a knee jerk emotional response.
You want to help increase women's monopoly over sex as a resource, you are the perfect example of what's wrong with having an ego.
Having an ego isn't bad all on its own, what's bad is being blinded by your ego, and being unwilling to accept that it may be influencing your thoughts and actions in an emotional way.
The problem is, this is what most people with egos do, they don't admit that their ego is misleading them, they deny it.
How aren't you being a "good little goyim cuck" when you advocate for something that feminists would?
Do you really have no self awareness to see how delusional you sound?
You are literally advocating for laws that would give women MORE POWER but you're using mental gymnastics to rationalize that as "not being a cuck" (you are the definition of a cuck, but your ego is blinding you)
YOU ARE A GOOD LITTLE GOYIM CUCK
YOU WANT TO BOLSTER WOMEN'S MONOPOLY OVER SEX (ARE YOU LISTENING TO YOURSELF?)
Last edited:
500€ for 15 .o. virgin Becky.
L
It is sex, sex is sex, you're just letting your ego create some arbitrary standard.
Your mental hangups don't warp reality and determine whether or not a biological process took place.
Your statement is as retarded as saying you can't lose your virginity if you pay for sex, and by that logic if a woman only ever paid for sex she could get ran through in all her holes by 100+ Chad male escorts and she's still be a virgin afterwards.
You are forming your opinion based on emotions not logic.
Mental concepts don't dictate biological reality.
Sex = sexual intercourse, not "I feel validated" + sexual intercourse.
1. You don't need to use a condom at all brothels.
2. The amount of dicks a woman has taken makes no difference if you are just trying to fuck her, it only matters if you are trying to "make her yours".
3. Any number higher that ZERO is a subjective and arbitrary standard when it comes to sex partners.
[Hard To Swallow Edition] More Than Zero Sexual Partners Equals A Whore (Any Other Value Is Arbitrary)
I often see many users making these illogical arbitrary claims about which number of sexual partners makes a woman a whore, and all the pointless exceptions they have that make a woman eligible for marriage. Virgin is the only choice, saying any other number is just arbitrary, any guy saying 1...
Which woman would you feel safer marrying:
Both are of the same age, race, attractiveness level, etc.
Woman A: 500 sex partners that were all 5ft tall, average faced and had 4 inch penises.
Woman B: 1 sex partner that was 6'5" tall, Chad face, and a 9 inch penis.
If we go by your logic, Woman B is your best bet of having a long lasting marriage without infidelity.
You guys forget that quality matters too, quantity isn't the only factor. In fact quantity only matters because it increases the likelihood that a woman will encounter a quality sex partner.
"Real" sex is sexual intercourse, not whatever personal definition you came up with that revolves around your ego.
By your logic every man in the far past that ever paid a "bride price" to a father to get his daughter never got "real sex".
Every man that bought a slave to be one of his wives never got "real sex".
So you, some random loser fuck in the future, somehow thinks your "modern standards" are superior to the standards of the men in the past whose masculinity dwarfs yours?
This is the problem with adhering to a modern standard of masculinity, you are adhering to "feminized masculinity". Men in the past didn't care about a woman's consent or attraction, you are projecting your modern standards onto the entire history of our species, all you have to do is look back at the past and you'll see that it's you that has the wrong standards.
[Hard To Swallow Edition] The Greatest Trick Society Ever Pulled Was Convincing Men To Adhere To A Feminized Standard Of Masculinity & Be Proud Of It
Ever heard of this quote: "The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn’t exist" Well here's the thing, society has basically done this to men, and many men (ironically even so called "black pilled" incels) don't seem to be aware of this. Even though its right in...
Your response to this thread is what's wrong. Your ego blinds you from looking at things logically and instead you have a knee jerk emotional response.
You want to help increase women's monopoly over sex as a resource, you are the perfect example of what's wrong with having an ego.
Having an ego isn't bad all on its own, what's bad is being blinded by your ego, and being unwilling to accept that it may be influencing your thoughts and actions in an emotional way.
The problem is, this is what most people with egos do, they don't admit that their ego is misleading them, they deny it.
How aren't you being a "good little goyim cuck" when you advocate for something that feminists would?
Do you really have no self awareness to see how delusional you sound?
You are literally advocating for laws that would give women MORE POWER but you're using mental gymnastics to rationalize that as "not being a cuck" (you are the definition of a cuck, but your ego is blinding you)
YOU ARE A GOOD LITTLE GOYIM CUCK
YOU WANT TO BOLSTER WOMEN'S MONOPOLY OVER SEX (ARE YOU LISTENING TO YOURSELF?)
It is sex, sex is sex, you're just letting your ego create some arbitrary standard.
Your mental hangups don't warp reality and determine whether or not a biological process took place.
Your statement is as retarded as saying you can't lose your virginity if you pay for sex, and by that logic if a woman only ever paid for sex she could get ran through in all her holes by 100+ Chad male escorts and she's still be a virgin afterwards.
You are forming your opinion based on emotions not logic.
Mental concepts don't dictate biological reality.
Sex = sexual intercourse, not "I feel validated" + sexual intercourse.
1. You don't need to use a condom at all brothels.
2. The amount of dicks a woman has taken makes no difference if you are just trying to fuck her, it only matters if you are trying to "make her yours".
3. Any number higher that ZERO is a subjective and arbitrary standard when it comes to sex partners.
[Hard To Swallow Edition] More Than Zero Sexual Partners Equals A Whore (Any Other Value Is Arbitrary)
I often see many users making these illogical arbitrary claims about which number of sexual partners makes a woman a whore, and all the pointless exceptions they have that make a woman eligible for marriage. Virgin is the only choice, saying any other number is just arbitrary, any guy saying 1...
Which woman would you feel safer marrying:
Both are of the same age, race, attractiveness level, etc.
Woman A: 500 sex partners that were all 5ft tall, average faced and had 4 inch penises.
Woman B: 1 sex partner that was 6'5" tall, Chad face, and a 9 inch penis.
If we go by your logic, Woman B is your best bet of having a long lasting marriage without infidelity.
You guys forget that quality matters too, quantity isn't the only factor. In fact quantity only matters because it increases the likelihood that a woman will encounter a quality sex partner.
"Real" sex is sexual intercourse, not whatever personal definition you came up with that revolves around your ego.
By your logic every man in the far past that ever paid a "bride price" to a father to get his daughter never got "real sex".
Every man that bought a slave to be one of his wives never got "real sex".
So you, some random loser fuck in the future, somehow thinks your "modern standards" are superior to the standards of the men in the past whose masculinity dwarfs yours?
This is the problem with adhering to a modern standard of masculinity, you are adhering to "feminized masculinity". Men in the past didn't care about a woman's consent or attraction, you are projecting your modern standards onto the entire history of our species, all you have to do is look back at the past and you'll see that it's you that has the wrong standards.
[Hard To Swallow Edition] The Greatest Trick Society Ever Pulled Was Convincing Men To Adhere To A Feminized Standard Of Masculinity & Be Proud Of It
Ever heard of this quote: "The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn’t exist" Well here's the thing, society has basically done this to men, and many men (ironically even so called "black pilled" incels) don't seem to be aware of this. Even though its right in...
Your response to this thread is what's wrong. Your ego blinds you from looking at things logically and instead you have a knee jerk emotional response.
You want to help increase women's monopoly over sex as a resource, you are the perfect example of what's wrong with having an ego.
Having an ego isn't bad all on its own, what's bad is being blinded by your ego, and being unwilling to accept that it may be influencing your thoughts and actions in an emotional way.
The problem is, this is what most people with egos do, they don't admit that their ego is misleading them, they deny it.
How aren't you being a "good little goyim cuck" when you advocate for something that feminists would?
Do you really have no self awareness to see how delusional you sound?
You are literally advocating for laws that would give women MORE POWER but you're using mental gymnastics to rationalize that as "not being a cuck" (you are the definition of a cuck, but your ego is blinding you)
YOU ARE A GOOD LITTLE GOYIM CUCK
YOU WANT TO BOLSTER WOMEN'S MONOPOLY OVER SEX (ARE YOU LISTENING TO YOURSELF?)
Yeah bro giving an option to the foids to earn money by using their bodies is so based and balckpilled!!!!
1. What option?, they're already doing it. Its men who need more options not women.
How often do you think women get jailed for prostitution?
Now ask yourself how often to men get jailed for solicitation?
The only option this would give, is an option to men to not go to jail for being horny and sex deprived.
Whores get "arrested" all the time but in the large majority of cases they just get let back out. Society takes the revolving door approach when it comes to women prostituting themselves because "it's not their fault". Men get jailed and treated like shit.
2. Last time I checked, DATING and MARRIAGE still exist
Customs you'd ironically take part in without seeing the obvious contradiction
Men have always been paying women for sex and/or companionship since the beginning, nothing has changed. You are playing semantic mind games with yourself if you think you aren't paying for sex when you take a woman out on a "date" and you're the one paying for the food, drinks, transportation, entertainment, contraception, etc, etc, etc.
Prostitution = Renting
Dating = Leasing
Marriage = Dating
AT THE END OF THE DAY WERE ALL PAYING.
Escortcelling shouldn't count as losing virginity as it's fake sex cheat code, but increasing the supply of pussy by increasing prostitution would only do good to us all
You shouldn't need to pay to eat either, will you hunt your own food?
nigga you write whole novels when someone disrespect your kweens (escorts)
is your mom an escort?
Hypothetically, if a woman for her first time paid a group of Chad male escorts to gang bang her, would she still be a virgin afterwards?
If your answer is no then your "rules" are arbitrary and aren't based on logic.
Are you retarded?, you didn't say anything about escorts, you said something about members of this forum.
That was directed towards incels here not escorts, did you somehow forget your own words?
I can already tell you are a druggie, it's usually you retards that have short term memory like this
Is weed your favorite or is it alcohol?
You know very well who this was directed at. I directed it at people like you who protect prostitution like it's an religion. Too bad licking all of the chad and tyrone cum out of some escort's axe wound damaged your brainAre you retarded?, you didn't say anything about escorts, you said something about members of this forum.
That was directed towards incels here not escorts, did you somehow forget your own words?
I can already tell you are a druggie, it's usually you retards that have short term memory like this
Is weed your favorite or is it alcohol?
Pick One
I really hope this cope charicature of prostitution you dreamed up is worth all the decades sexual starvation that await you
But hey, maybe you're Low T so it isn't bothering you now and it never will. In that regard you are lucky, your delusions are perfectly aligned with your soyboy genetics.
infiltrating faggot homo, they came thick and fast in 21GTAB get that ass banned
"soyboy" i'm attracted to prime foids while you are attracted to used up cum rags.
but you'll never get those prime foids
the difference is, he has swallowed and accepted reality, you have not
All women today a cum rags, the only difference is to what degree, you are just showing yourself to be helpless coper with responses like this.
"Uh uh uh, the women I'm attracted to are different".
Give yourself a good ol pat on the back for being attracted to "prime" women you'll never fuck, meanwhile men like me will be enjoying ourselves.
I guess you win.
Man I swear ego obsessed incels are retarded, you actually sound proud of keeping yourself sex deprived.
the difference is that he ahs injected soy into his veins and i have not
Anyway it takes till post #39 for me to ask stupid OP - why is it useless?
Last edited:
I'm sure 3D lolis are cum rags. Do they have gangbangs the day are born as well?
A lot of the guys like @Abominationcel have "Peter Pan Syndrome"
He's going to give you some BS response about "love" and "validation", then immediately go to another thread on this forum and say that life is all about biology and genetics and women are incapable of love.
These retards contradict themselves at every waking moment.
Last edited:
A lot of the guys like @Abominationcel have "Peter Pan Syndrome"
He's going to give you some Bs response about "love" and "validation", the immediately go to another thread on this forum and say that life is all about biology and genetics and women are incapable of love.
These retards contradict themselves at every waking moment.
so true
sticking your dick in a used up cum encrusted hole isn't sex and if you think otherwise you are bluepilled. it is the same as using a fleshlight other guys have used before.
self projection jfl. i never talk about that bluepilled crap nor do people who dont want to give foids money because they arent soomth brain retards like you and your cuck gang is.
than i hope you dont have social healthcare so the world would be rid of low T men such as you
>Those guys are Low T
>My sex drive is so low that paying for sex isn't even an option to me
The irony
If your testosterone levels were normal you would not even be saying any of this nonsense.
Every normie male I've met at all the places I've worked has paid for sex at least once, and all of them have girl friends or wives (some still do it even though they have a partner).
Guys like us are clearly the low T ones, not you who can live his entire life without having sex (sound logic there mate
).
If you want to allow prostitution, then regulate it so they can only charge FAIR prices.
If this is not posible, then forbid it al together.
No foid worshipping.
If this is not posible, then forbid it al together.
No foid worshipping.
that should happen naturally, it's the nature of capitalism
Similar threads
InceldianWarrior
Users who are viewing this thread
