Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

JFL Enough with the "chadsexual" incel bullshit, women aren't straight, they are either lesbians or asexuals

Finding 5% of men attractive= not liking men
Even that 5% of men not being able to monetize with their body like foids do= women not being into men
and that top 5% of men are chads, therefore you're disagreeing with the redditor. they explicitly said that women are all lesbian or asexual. saying that most women are more into the average woman than the average man, and that they're also attracted to the top percentage of men, is saying they're "chadsexual". its not that hard. we also know that when women say they hate men or find all men ugly, they're referring to the vast majority of them. the reddit OP is likely a man-hating woman/dyke or tranny who's trying to muddy the waters by making the issue more extreme than it is.

the subreddit is actually very blackpilled and spreading useful information, that women largely dont find average men attractive and are more physically attracted to other women (i have a theory that this could be due to narcissism from being praised their whole lives) thus its able to coexist with blackpilled ideas like hypergamy. if you're an average looking man, women will find other women more sexually appealing than you, but they'll still bend over for the genetically elite men who meet their sky high standards for what a man should be, since they're more turned on by the idea of a man than men themselves. they're also more likely to give it up for thugs/criminals because they live up to the perverted ideas and fantasies they have of what a "powerful" "dominant" man should be since women are naturally weaker and submissive and want to be violated (just have a good personality, btw.) however, feminists like the OP turn this into a way to push their anti-male agenda, and infiltrate what should be a space to discuss actual studies/statistics about female sexuality so they can seethe more about how much they hate men. they're perverting the facts and data to put down and demoralize men, its malicious and dishonest. optimally, the data should be used to make men aware of true female nature/sexuality.
nah I agree with them on this one. the chadsexual stuff is starting to sound like the real cope. I've never seen a foid thirsting over chad but I've seen plenty of foids disgusted by men in general
bro, have you not seen a single chadfishing experiment? you cant just dismiss those, chads get a stupid amount of women lusting after them. in fact, they get more attention than the average dykes do on dating apps (i've experimented myself). and if an increasing amount of men are celibate, yet women are still having sex just about as much, where are those women being funneled into? i know a good amount are fucking other women, but its not the vast majority who are exclusively scissoring other foids, they're still hardwired to crave dick. are you denying hypergamy as a whole? this is far more delusional than anything said on here.
you're right but this forum is too low iq to get it
right here you're disagreeing with the reddit feminist, saying that women are generally attracted to the top percentage of men is literally the general sentiment here and aligns with all of the facts/studies. when people say "women dont like men", whether it be incels or women themselves, they're referring to the bottom 90% of men, while OP is saying women have NO attraction to ANY men, which is baseless.
 
and that top 5% of men are chads, therefore you're disagreeing with the redditor. they explicitly said that women are all lesbian or asexual. saying that most women are more into the average woman than the average man, and that they're also attracted to the top percentage of men, is saying they're "chadsexual". its not that hard. we also know that when women say they hate men or find all men ugly, they're referring to the vast majority of them. the reddit OP is likely a man-hating woman/dyke or tranny who's trying to muddy the waters by making the issue more extreme than it is.
Women find attractive a extremely small minority of men, such men are nowhere near as sexually powerfull as the average femoid is. Hence we can generally say women are not into men
 
such men are nowhere near as sexually powerfull as the average femoid is.
Recent prime example is Kaka.

The looksmaxxing retards with their mythical chad-fantasy will never learn. Even fucking Presley got divorced by some mid roastie.
 
Last edited:
It's ropefuel to see foid rather turn gay than give you a chance
Why? Once you start to see foids as just females, as in animals, you don't feel rage over them sexually and romantically ignoring you. It's like being mad at a lion because it doesn't want to be your pet.
 
Women find attractive a extremely small minority of men, such men are nowhere near as sexually powerfull as the average femoid is. Hence we can generally say women are not into men
yeah thats what i and many here/on that reddit agree with. OP gives me vibes of a man-hating freak who thinks that not even the biggest gigachad can get a single foid even a little bit moist. thats all i was saying.
 
that subreddit has mere hours left :feelshaha:
 
I would even expand on it and add something. Something very significant, a force that is mercifully almost forgotten.

Female sex hierarchy:

Gigachads > Chads > Men with big penises > Other women > Chadlites > Horses > Dogs > HTNs > MTNs > Other animals > Killing themself > Below MTN.
Why would men with big penises be above horses?
 
damn they posted the gender swap meme. a timeless blackpill :smonk:

4eu9pa8356qf1
 
Heterocompatibility, chadsexuality, political lesbianism. Three different terms but I'd say that they are all the same thing.
 
and that top 5% of men are chads, therefore you're disagreeing with the redditor. they explicitly said that women are all lesbian or asexual. saying that most women are more into the average woman than the average man, and that they're also attracted to the top percentage of men, is saying they're "chadsexual". its not that hard. we also know that when women say they hate men or find all men ugly, they're referring to the vast majority of them. the reddit OP is likely a man-hating woman/dyke or tranny who's trying to muddy the waters by making the issue more extreme than it is.

the subreddit is actually very blackpilled and spreading useful information, that women largely dont find average men attractive and are more physically attracted to other women (i have a theory that this could be due to narcissism from being praised their whole lives) thus its able to coexist with blackpilled ideas like hypergamy. if you're an average looking man, women will find other women more sexually appealing than you, but they'll still bend over for the genetically elite men who meet their sky high standards for what a man should be, since they're more turned on by the idea of a man than men themselves. they're also more likely to give it up for thugs/criminals because they live up to the perverted ideas and fantasies they have of what a "powerful" "dominant" man should be since women are naturally weaker and submissive and want to be violated (just have a good personality, btw.) however, feminists like the OP turn this into a way to push their anti-male agenda, and infiltrate what should be a space to discuss actual studies/statistics about female sexuality so they can seethe more about how much they hate men. they're perverting the facts and data to put down and demoralize men, its malicious and dishonest. optimally, the data should be used to make men aware of true female nature/sexuality.

bro, have you not seen a single chadfishing experiment? you cant just dismiss those, chads get a stupid amount of women lusting after them. in fact, they get more attention than the average dykes do on dating apps (i've experimented myself). and if an increasing amount of men are celibate, yet women are still having sex just about as much, where are those women being funneled into? i know a good amount are fucking other women, but its not the vast majority who are exclusively scissoring other foids, they're still hardwired to crave dick. are you denying hypergamy as a whole? this is far more delusional than anything said on here.

right here you're disagreeing with the reddit feminist, saying that women are generally attracted to the top percentage of men is literally the general sentiment here and aligns with all of the facts/studies. when people say "women dont like men", whether it be incels or women themselves, they're referring to the bottom 90% of men, while OP is saying women have NO attraction to ANY men, which is baseless.
Basically summed up my stance entirely. Very well-put. This particular sentence right here
they're more turned on by the idea of a man than men themselves
is perfect, and what the central message/theme of that sub would be if it was intellectually honest (and not full of weird transsexuals & proto-troons). Promising GrAY.

In regards to the two guys you’re arguing with, I’ve noticed a phenomenon where, ironically, the more (and longer) people surround themselves with blackpilled people, the more they forget the blackpill due to never seeing it affirmed. For example there’s a curry user here @Justice who’s been around since the forum was founded, yet he’s made threads promoting or at least ostensibly falling for curry PUA scammers.

Rehab Room said it best in a recent video: it’s actually people outside the BP community who are looking into the eyes of the beast and seeing the BP affirmed in real time – not us. Like this year when the PUA community tore each other apart and exposed themselves as scammers with ugly wives and fabricated sexual success/client results.

Some people genuinely need time away from here to remember the blackpill
 
Recent prime example is Kaka.

The looksmaxxing retards with their mythical chad-fantasy will never learn. Even fucking Presley got divorced by some mid roastie.
True, one example of how looksfaggers have bastardized the BP is by convincing men that unconditional love can be achieved past a certain looks threshold. In reality hypergamy is everlasting, and there’ll always be a bigger fish in the sea who’s better than you or has something you don’t.

I don’t see how this supports the reddit troon’s idea that women aren’t biologically attracted to Chad though. It just means they don’t simp for Chads like men do for women, probably because the average mid foid’s options are just as abundant as Chad’s
 
Basically summed up my stance entirely. Very well-put. This particular sentence right here

is perfect, and what the central message/theme of that sub would be if it was intellectually honest (and not full of weird transsexuals & proto-troons). Promising GrAY.
appreciated bro... i've been lurking on and off for years but finally caved to making an account because it pains me to see people not pointing out the obvious. i saw your posts were high IQ and reasonable but i had the itch to lay it all out in longer format since people were missing the point.
 
and that top 5% of men are chads, therefore you're disagreeing with the redditor. they explicitly said that women are all lesbian or asexual. saying that most women are more into the average woman than the average man, and that they're also attracted to the top percentage of men, is saying they're "chadsexual". its not that hard. we also know that when women say they hate men or find all men ugly, they're referring to the vast majority of them. the reddit OP is likely a man-hating woman/dyke or tranny who's trying to muddy the waters by making the issue more extreme than it is.

the subreddit is actually very blackpilled and spreading useful information, that women largely dont find average men attractive and are more physically attracted to other women (i have a theory that this could be due to narcissism from being praised their whole lives) thus its able to coexist with blackpilled ideas like hypergamy. if you're an average looking man, women will find other women more sexually appealing than you, but they'll still bend over for the genetically elite men who meet their sky high standards for what a man should be, since they're more turned on by the idea of a man than men themselves. they're also more likely to give it up for thugs/criminals because they live up to the perverted ideas and fantasies they have of what a "powerful" "dominant" man should be since women are naturally weaker and submissive and want to be violated (just have a good personality, btw.) however, feminists like the OP turn this into a way to push their anti-male agenda, and infiltrate what should be a space to discuss actual studies/statistics about female sexuality so they can seethe more about how much they hate men. they're perverting the facts and data to put down and demoralize men, its malicious and dishonest. optimally, the data should be used to make men aware of true female nature/sexuality.

bro, have you not seen a single chadfishing experiment? you cant just dismiss those, chads get a stupid amount of women lusting after them. in fact, they get more attention than the average dykes do on dating apps (i've experimented myself). and if an increasing amount of men are celibate, yet women are still having sex just about as much, where are those women being funneled into? i know a good amount are fucking other women, but its not the vast majority who are exclusively scissoring other foids, they're still hardwired to crave dick. are you denying hypergamy as a whole? this is far more delusional than anything said on here.

right here you're disagreeing with the reddit feminist, saying that women are generally attracted to the top percentage of men is literally the general sentiment here and aligns with all of the facts/studies. when people say "women dont like men", whether it be incels or women themselves, they're referring to the bottom 90% of men, while OP is saying women have NO attraction to ANY men, which is baseless.
I know what you're saying but this is all semantics and we basically agree with each other. obviously OP is exaggerating but we are both right it's just a matter of perspective. this forum likes to focus on the few % of men that foids find attractive while that subreddit likes to focus on the other foids that foids find attractive
 
Basically summed up my stance entirely. Very well-put. This particular sentence right here

is perfect, and what the central message/theme of that sub would be if it was intellectually honest (and not full of weird transsexuals & proto-troons). Promising GrAY.

In regards to the two guys you’re arguing with, I’ve noticed a phenomenon where, ironically, the more (and longer) people surround themselves with blackpilled people, the more they forget the blackpill due to never seeing it affirmed. For example there’s a curry user here @Justice who’s been around since the forum was founded, yet he’s made threads promoting or at least ostensibly falling for curry PUA scammers.

Rehab Room said it best in a recent video: it’s actually people outside the BP community who are looking into the eyes of the beast and seeing the BP affirmed in real time – not us. Like this year when the PUA community tore each other apart and exposed themselves as scammers with ugly wives and fabricated sexual success/client results.

Some people genuinely need time away from here to remember the blackpill
its a matter of perspective, like I said above. we are both right
 
It's ropefuel to see foid rather turn gay than give you a chance
In the past I saw it like this, but after hearing so many retards misinterpret hypergamy/sexual selection as “natural eugenics” I now feel differently about it.

Whether they fuck a GL guy, a thug, another woman, or a dog – they’re not fucking me. But the fact that they would fuck another woman, a low-inhib retard, or an animal is proof that not being able to attract women doesn’t make you or me inherently inferior (in and of itself anyway), because they’re not “eugenicists,” they’re just whores
 
Last edited:
I don’t see how this supports the reddit troon’s idea that women aren’t biologically attracted to Chad though. It just means they don’t simp for Chads like men do for women, probably because the average mid foid’s options are just as abundant as Chad’s
YES, the retarded troon is mixing up attraction with investment in a relationship. Attraction alone cannot carry a relationship. This incredible need to be deeply invested in a relationship with a foid prevents men from treating foids as literal cumbuckets. The fact that men still simp despite of foids' fascistic hatred of men just highlights how insane the whole thing is.
 
Last edited:
Recent prime example is Kaka.

The looksmaxxing retards with their mythical chad-fantasy will never learn. Even fucking Presley got divorced by some mid roastie.
As citycrusher said looks for men are important but are a proxy for status. Good looks basically translate into high status/high social hierarchy. That’s why foids are into chad looking men but seldom would pay for them or subscribe to their OF
 
Sub-5/Normies/Non-chads are painfully ugly, only fags like us. Heterosexuality is pseudo-scientific cope.
 

Similar threads

Lv99_BixNood
Replies
27
Views
2K
Claudius the God
Claudius the God
Oneitiscel
Replies
18
Views
794
Bulbasaur
Bulbasaur
Lv99_BixNood
Replies
37
Views
2K
SlayerSlayer
SlayerSlayer
Lv99_BixNood
Replies
11
Views
565
Emba
Emba
Lv99_BixNood
Replies
15
Views
1K
Saiyangenetics
Saiyangenetics

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top
×
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →