Electric cars are a scam

[Retardfuel]

View: https://x.com/PseudoProphet/status/1949881454437048702?t=Z5G-amSIBwyHvqaWcPITEg&s=19


That lithium battery is pain to extinguish once it catches fire

The 3 phase motor magnetic field at 2 tesla kills your sperm

Muh "green energy" is cope, making those cars causes shit ton of waste

 

[Epedaphic]

Muh "green energy" is cope, making those cars causes shit ton of waste

This one gets me the most, that so many people are so naive that they completely ignore the pollution produced by the production of the cars and think it’s good for the environment because it runs on electricity. Also where do they think electricity comes from?

 

[Trident]

This one gets me the most, that so many people are so naive that they completely ignore the pollution produced by the production of the cars and think it’s good for the environment because it runs on electricity. Also where do they think electricity comes from?

even spent nuclear fuel is not as dangerous if treated properly compared to millions of used batteries that will be laying around everywhere

 

[Justanotherbloke]

even spent nuclear fuel is not as dangerous if treated properly compared to millions of used batteries that will be laying around everywhere

True But comparing it directly to spent nuclear fuel is a false equivalence cause nuclear waste is radioactive for millennia and requires multi layered containment, and a single mistake can affect entire ecosystems. EV batteries aren't harmless but degrade chemically, not radiologically and can be handled/stored/recycled without long term environmental collapse. Difference is battery waste is a materials recovery and logistics problem. Difficult yes but tractable. Nuclear waste is a permanent hazard that requires isolation from life itself for 10k+ years. And economics of battery recycling are improving fast cause with new chemistries like sodium-ion and LFP reducing toxicity and increasing recyclability. Nuclear doesn't get safer with scale but batteries do.

 

[Retardfuel]

True But comparing it directly to spent nuclear fuel is a false equivalence cause nuclear waste is radioactive for millennia and requires multi layered containment, and a single mistake can affect entire ecosystems. EV batteries aren't harmless but degrade chemically, not radiologically and can be handled/stored/recycled without long term environmental collapse. Difference is battery waste is a materials recovery and logistics problem. Difficult yes but tractable. Nuclear waste is a permanent hazard that requires isolation from life itself for 10k+ years. And economics of battery recycling are improving fast cause with new chemistries like sodium-ion and LFP reducing toxicity and increasing recyclability. Nuclear doesn't get safer with scale but batteries do.

There are shithole countries who bury all kind of waste in their ground for money, basically any 3rd world shithole would store my used nuclear poop for a bribe

So I don't see why we should not use nuclear, there are tons of shitholes who would accept my nuke poo

 

[Justanotherbloke]

There are shithole countries who bury all kind of waste in their ground for money, basically any 3rd world shithole would store my used nuclear poop for a bribe

So I don't see why we should not use nuclear, there are tons of shitholes who would accept my nuke poo

Third world shitskin countries will take nuclear waste for money, yes, just like I would accept money to work outside of the usual work hours and avoid tax if I had the chance. But that’s not a disposal strategy, it’s risk outsourcing. High level waste stays radiologically active for tens of thousands of years. You need stable geology, passive containment systems, and lifecycle management built into national energy planning. That’s why serious countries build deep geological repositories, because engineered containment over 10k years isn't optional. If a third party cuts corners, the liability environmentally and politically gets delayed. Nuclear power makes sense long term.

 

[TooSomething]

The 3 phase motor magnetic field at 2 tesla kills your sperm

Driving an EV is basically like driving in a Microwave.

I've warned people so many times. If it fries you sperm cells, imagine what else it fries.
I've read somewhere that the risk of getting cancer increases a lot too.

But, tbh, it is a good thing. All these are fucking retards anyway, so it is a good thing that they get sterilized that way.

 

[TooSomething]

This one gets me the most, that so many people are so naive that they completely ignore the pollution produced by the production of the cars and think it’s good for the environment because it runs on electricity. Also where do they think electricity comes from?

I've seen EV drivers recharge their vehicles at a station which surprisinglt was powered by a diesel generator. Jfl

 

[TooSomething]

even spent nuclear fuel is not as dangerous if treated properly compared to millions of used batteries that will be laying around everywhere

I've read that the French apparently have found a way to reuse spent fuel rods a second time.

 

[TooSomething]

True But comparing it directly to spent nuclear fuel is a false equivalence cause nuclear waste is radioactive for millennia and requires multi layered containment, and a single mistake can affect entire ecosystems. EV batteries aren't harmless but degrade chemically, not radiologically and can be handled/stored/recycled without long term environmental collapse. Difference is battery waste is a materials recovery and logistics problem. Difficult yes but tractable. Nuclear waste is a permanent hazard that requires isolation from life itself for 10k+ years. And economics of battery recycling are improving fast cause with new chemistries like sodium-ion and LFP reducing toxicity and increasing recyclability. Nuclear doesn't get safer with scale but batteries do.

Aren't nuclear reactors a hoax anyway, as well as radiation?

 

[TooSomething]

Third world shitskin countries will take nuclear waste for money, yes, just like I would accept money to work outside of the usual work hours and avoid tax if I had the chance. But that’s not a disposal strategy, it’s risk outsourcing. High level waste stays radiologically active for tens of thousands of years. You need stable geology, passive containment systems, and lifecycle management built into national energy planning. That’s why serious countries build deep geological repositories, because engineered containment over 10k years isn't optional. If a third party cuts corners, the liability environmentally and politically gets delayed. Nuclear power makes sense long term.

If space is real and the sun is as big as we're told, why don't we just launch our nuclear waste directly into the sun?

 

[lnceI]

Driving an EV is basically like driving in a Microwave.

I've warned people so many times. If it fries you sperm cells, imagine what else it fries.
I've read somewhere that the risk of getting cancer increases a lot too.

But, tbh, it is a good thing. All these are fucking retards anyway, so it is a good thing that they get sterilized that way.

 

[Justanotherbloke]

If space is real and the sun is as big as we're told, why don't we just launch our nuclear waste directly into the sun?

You even realize how difficult that is?
The Sun is not a stationary target cause earth is whipping around the Sun at speeds like 30km per second. You'd need to cancel out all of that orbital velocity first. That’s way more energy than just launching something into deep space. It's actually easier to throw something out of the solar system than to fall into the Sun. On top of that if a rocket carrying nuclear waste fails during launch, you risk contaminating the entire ecosystem. Risk/reward ratio is negative of you look at it.

 

[VersoffenerAssi]

The ultimate goal, anyway, is to abolish individual mobility and lock you up in a climate prison. The whole eco/climate hoax is just a pretext for total enslavement and dispossession.

If space is real and the sun is as big as we're told, why don't we just launch our nuclear waste directly into the sun?

Because nothing has ever been shot into this imaginary space, except for the imagination of the sheeple/NPCs.
If the garbage was real, space travel would long ago be as normal as a regular flight, and people would spend their holidays on the moon, that supposed lump of rock in the vacuum of space.
While we were at it, maybe we could also bring some nuclear waste along... Or at least on regular cargo flights.
But, ultimately, it's all nothing but a hoax, and only a select group of Freemasons and super rich celebrities has "seen" the imaginary space so far. While we were presented with ridiculous animations and cartoons, as well as cheap Hollywood tricks. Lmfao

 

[VersoffenerAssi]

The sun is, in truth, like the pendulum of a gigantic clock (And like its hour hand). One might want to study how it relates to the length of the day, how the differences from one day to the next are greatest at the equinoxes, and how they then "slow down" when approaching a solstice (=SonnenWende !! The term itself says it all in German, truth hidden in plain sight). That can hardly work with this accuracy in their heliocentric sun-worship model.
Especially since one can see much further than it should even be possible on the surface of a sphere with a circumference of about 40,000 km.