D
Deleted member 39864
Self-banned
-
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2021
- Posts
- 403
I see so many people here claiming you have to be an atheist in order to be truly blackpilled. It’s completely retarded.
To start with the definitions...
Atheism = No belief in a Deity or the supernatural. There’s stuff like strong atheism and soft atheism, etc but that’s not important right now.
Blackpill = Worldview that states looks are the most important asset of any person and that the value you are assigned as a person is mostly or wholly based on that. Basically, life value and life fulfillment = looks. (This is the most widely agreed definition, so don’t come to me asking why I didn’t mention your version of it which actually is just your personal opinion)
Right out of the gate there are no similarities between both ideologies.
When you look deeper, there are still no similarities. At best, there are a few ones which are extremely general and can apply to many other things.
With atheism, you can get naturalism (the view that natural law is the only force existent within the universe), nihilism (the view that life does not matter),the superiority of science/“reason” (Science being the best and only way to determine what is right and what world view to take) and skepticism (questioning everything)
With the blackpill, you will often get nihilism, which isn’t inherently part of the blackpill, but rather a potential reaction to it if someone realizes they are of low genetic potential. There’s next to no similarities between both ideologies.
People here will assert both the blackpill and atheism are the “bitter truth.” and therefore, you have to accept both.
as for the blackpill, I agree. As it’s been tested and is a fundamental part of human nature. Infact, lookism (the foundation of the blackpill) was necessary for humans to properly evolve and get to the top of the food chain.
As for atheism, this is where I must disagree. Because there is absolutely no proof for atheism, there is nothing confirming it as the truth, or even the most valid religious worldview.
Even if we exclude religion, there is not a single reason why atheism is more valid than other non-religious world views such as agnosticism, or deism, or the countless irreligious world views that exist.
So there’s no proof for atheism being more valid/true than any religious philosophy. Nor can we establish atheism as more valid than other non religious ideologies. Yet you want to claim it’s the “bitter truth”? Just fucking lol.
Now, DONT take this as me knocking on atheists as a whole. Atheism is a fair world view to have, but you shouldn’t push it on others by telling them that they have to be an atheist in order to be blackpilled, or some nonsense of you being more blackpilled since you are atheist.
Also, for all you blackpilled atheists who assert atheism is the absolute truth and that accepting it means you accept reality, Most atheists in the US identify as liberal. Atheists in general are the group most likely to identify as left wing (socially especially). Left wing politics are the epitome of the bluepill, something all blackpillers see as a coping mechanism and denial of reality.
Just food for thought
To start with the definitions...
Atheism = No belief in a Deity or the supernatural. There’s stuff like strong atheism and soft atheism, etc but that’s not important right now.
Blackpill = Worldview that states looks are the most important asset of any person and that the value you are assigned as a person is mostly or wholly based on that. Basically, life value and life fulfillment = looks. (This is the most widely agreed definition, so don’t come to me asking why I didn’t mention your version of it which actually is just your personal opinion)
Right out of the gate there are no similarities between both ideologies.
When you look deeper, there are still no similarities. At best, there are a few ones which are extremely general and can apply to many other things.
With atheism, you can get naturalism (the view that natural law is the only force existent within the universe), nihilism (the view that life does not matter),the superiority of science/“reason” (Science being the best and only way to determine what is right and what world view to take) and skepticism (questioning everything)
With the blackpill, you will often get nihilism, which isn’t inherently part of the blackpill, but rather a potential reaction to it if someone realizes they are of low genetic potential. There’s next to no similarities between both ideologies.
People here will assert both the blackpill and atheism are the “bitter truth.” and therefore, you have to accept both.
as for the blackpill, I agree. As it’s been tested and is a fundamental part of human nature. Infact, lookism (the foundation of the blackpill) was necessary for humans to properly evolve and get to the top of the food chain.
As for atheism, this is where I must disagree. Because there is absolutely no proof for atheism, there is nothing confirming it as the truth, or even the most valid religious worldview.
Even if we exclude religion, there is not a single reason why atheism is more valid than other non-religious world views such as agnosticism, or deism, or the countless irreligious world views that exist.
So there’s no proof for atheism being more valid/true than any religious philosophy. Nor can we establish atheism as more valid than other non religious ideologies. Yet you want to claim it’s the “bitter truth”? Just fucking lol.
Now, DONT take this as me knocking on atheists as a whole. Atheism is a fair world view to have, but you shouldn’t push it on others by telling them that they have to be an atheist in order to be blackpilled, or some nonsense of you being more blackpilled since you are atheist.
Also, for all you blackpilled atheists who assert atheism is the absolute truth and that accepting it means you accept reality, Most atheists in the US identify as liberal. Atheists in general are the group most likely to identify as left wing (socially especially). Left wing politics are the epitome of the bluepill, something all blackpillers see as a coping mechanism and denial of reality.
Just food for thought