Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Soy Edgy Non-NT atheists hijacking the blackpill.

  • Thread starter Deleted member 39864
  • Start date
D

Deleted member 39864

Self-banned
-
Joined
Dec 27, 2021
Posts
403
I see so many people here claiming you have to be an atheist in order to be truly blackpilled. It’s completely retarded.

To start with the definitions...

Atheism = No belief in a Deity or the supernatural. There’s stuff like strong atheism and soft atheism, etc but that’s not important right now.

Blackpill = Worldview that states looks are the most important asset of any person and that the value you are assigned as a person is mostly or wholly based on that. Basically, life value and life fulfillment = looks. (This is the most widely agreed definition, so don’t come to me asking why I didn’t mention your version of it which actually is just your personal opinion)

Right out of the gate there are no similarities between both ideologies.

When you look deeper, there are still no similarities. At best, there are a few ones which are extremely general and can apply to many other things.

With atheism, you can get naturalism (the view that natural law is the only force existent within the universe), nihilism (the view that life does not matter),the superiority of science/“reason” (Science being the best and only way to determine what is right and what world view to take) and skepticism (questioning everything)

With the blackpill, you will often get nihilism, which isn’t inherently part of the blackpill, but rather a potential reaction to it if someone realizes they are of low genetic potential. There’s next to no similarities between both ideologies.

People here will assert both the blackpill and atheism are the “bitter truth.” and therefore, you have to accept both.

as for the blackpill, I agree. As it’s been tested and is a fundamental part of human nature. Infact, lookism (the foundation of the blackpill) was necessary for humans to properly evolve and get to the top of the food chain.

As for atheism, this is where I must disagree. Because there is absolutely no proof for atheism, there is nothing confirming it as the truth, or even the most valid religious worldview.

Even if we exclude religion, there is not a single reason why atheism is more valid than other non-religious world views such as agnosticism, or deism, or the countless irreligious world views that exist.

So there’s no proof for atheism being more valid/true than any religious philosophy. Nor can we establish atheism as more valid than other non religious ideologies. Yet you want to claim it’s the “bitter truth”? Just fucking lol.

Now, DONT take this as me knocking on atheists as a whole. Atheism is a fair world view to have, but you shouldn’t push it on others by telling them that they have to be an atheist in order to be blackpilled, or some nonsense of you being more blackpilled since you are atheist.

Also, for all you blackpilled atheists who assert atheism is the absolute truth and that accepting it means you accept reality, Most atheists in the US identify as liberal. Atheists in general are the group most likely to identify as left wing (socially especially). Left wing politics are the epitome of the bluepill, something all blackpillers see as a coping mechanism and denial of reality.

Just food for thought
 
Religious people always think people are atheist because there's some proof for it (which is a weird statement in itself, can't prove a negative). It's because there is no rational reason to believe in any religion, only emotional ones.
 
Religious people always think people are atheist because there's some proof for it (which is a weird statement in itself, can't prove a negative). It's because there is no rational reason to believe in any religion, only emotional ones.
Religion and atheism are not polar opposites. I also know you didn't read the thread because I mentioned non religious and non atheistic worldviews.
Even if we exclude religion, there is not a single reason why atheism is more valid than other non-religious world views such as agnosticism, or deism, or the countless irreligious world views that exist.
.
It's because there is no rational reason to believe in any religion, only emotional ones.
 
I don't believe you have to be an atheist to be :blackpill: tbh
Religious people can simply accept their God hates them :lul:
 
Atheism is apolitical, plus you can be Blackpilled and a Socialist or a small-l liberal as left-wingcels can call for the redistribution of pussy, something many historical socialists did. :blackpill:
 
I don't believe you have to be an atheist to be :blackpill: tbh
Religious people can simply accept their God hates them :lul:

Yes, they can be blackpilled on life but bluepilled on the afterlife. Let the religiouscels be religiouscels, there's no need to let other things divide us.
 
Religion and atheism are not polar opposites. I also know you didn't read the thread because I mentioned non religious and non atheistic worldviews.

.

Ok, who cares. My point is spirituality is an emotional decision for 99% of people and when that isn't necessary there's no (rational) reason left to be religious (spiritual).
 
Ok, who cares. My point is spirituality is an emotional decision for 99% of people and when that isn't necessary there's no (rational) reason left to be religious (spiritual).
You act as if emotion and rationality are 100% different but even here you fail. Who are you to determine what is logical and rational?
 
Last edited:
You act as if emotion and rationality are 100% different but even here you fail. Who are you to determine what is logical and rational?
Rationality is when you believe something because of how it's explained, emotionality is when you want to satisfy your emotional needs. A lot of religious people admit this by saying you just need "faith" and not ask questions.
 
Rationality is when you believe something because of how it's explained, emotionality is when you want to satisfy your emotional needs. A lot of religious people admit this by saying you just need "faith" and not ask questions.
So believing life was made by a creator, and not some atoms coming together randomly, is emotional?
 
So believing life was made by a creator, and not some atoms coming together randomly, is emotional?
Yes, you want a quick answer to a big question without putting in the effort to try to find actual truth
 
Yes, you want a quick answer to a big question without putting in the effort to try to find actual truth
Many scientists are theists who believe in God, they don't buy into the evolution theory where we all evolved from pond scum. They have put effort in and they don't believe life on Earth happened without a creator. I doubt they are making emotional decisions.
 
I see so many people here claiming you have to be an atheist in order to be truly blackpilled. It’s completely retarded.

To start with the definitions...

Atheism = No belief in a Deity or the supernatural. There’s stuff like strong atheism and soft atheism, etc but that’s not important right now.

Blackpill = Worldview that states looks are the most important asset of any person and that the value you are assigned as a person is mostly or wholly based on that. Basically, life value and life fulfillment = looks. (This is the most widely agreed definition, so don’t come to me asking why I didn’t mention your version of it which actually is just your personal opinion)

Right out of the gate there are no similarities between both ideologies.

When you look deeper, there are still no similarities. At best, there are a few ones which are extremely general and can apply to many other things.

With atheism, you can get naturalism (the view that natural law is the only force existent within the universe), nihilism (the view that life does not matter),the superiority of science/“reason” (Science being the best and only way to determine what is right and what world view to take) and skepticism (questioning everything)

With the blackpill, you will often get nihilism, which isn’t inherently part of the blackpill, but rather a potential reaction to it if someone realizes they are of low genetic potential. There’s next to no similarities between both ideologies.

People here will assert both the blackpill and atheism are the “bitter truth.” and therefore, you have to accept both.

as for the blackpill, I agree. As it’s been tested and is a fundamental part of human nature. Infact, lookism (the foundation of the blackpill) was necessary for humans to properly evolve and get to the top of the food chain.

As for atheism, this is where I must disagree. Because there is absolutely no proof for atheism, there is nothing confirming it as the truth, or even the most valid religious worldview.

Even if we exclude religion, there is not a single reason why atheism is more valid than other non-religious world views such as agnosticism, or deism, or the countless irreligious world views that exist.

So there’s no proof for atheism being more valid/true than any religious philosophy. Nor can we establish atheism as more valid than other non religious ideologies. Yet you want to claim it’s the “bitter truth”? Just fucking lol.

Now, DONT take this as me knocking on atheists as a whole. Atheism is a fair world view to have, but you shouldn’t push it on others by telling them that they have to be an atheist in order to be blackpilled, or some nonsense of you being more blackpilled since you are atheist.

Also, for all you blackpilled atheists who assert atheism is the absolute truth and that accepting it means you accept reality, Most atheists in the US identify as liberal. Atheists in general are the group most likely to identify as left wing (socially especially). Left wing politics are the epitome of the bluepill, something all blackpillers see as a coping mechanism and denial of reality.

Just food for thought
Religion is good for social order. I personally think that's all its good for
 
God created heavens and Earth in literal 6 days.
 
explain why some atheist religions exist
"Atheist religion", those things are religions where people don't worship but believe in god or something supernatural like karma. This is some bullshit religious people say to make it seem like their religion is progressive or was "ahead of time"

Atheism = No believe in god's existence which by default would also include supernatural ideas
 
"Atheist religion", those things are religions where people don't worship but believe in god or something supernatural like karma. This is some bullshit religious people say to make it seem like their religion is progressive or was "ahead of time"

Atheism = No believe in god's existence which by default would also include supernatural ideas
nah im pretty sure some people dont believe in god but believe in supernatural stuff. kinda weird but that's what they claim
 
I’m not atheist I’m just not religious
 
I see atheism and also antinatalism as a part of the blackpill.
 
nah im pretty sure some people dont believe in god but believe in supernatural stuff. kinda weird but that's what they claim

That's superstition. Which is the basis for theism.
 
Religious people always think people are atheist because there's some proof for it (which is a weird statement in itself, can't prove a negative). It's because there is no rational reason to believe in any religion, only emotional ones.
You can t prove negative, also you can't prove positive.

If you use Popper criterion it is irrelevant how many facts support your theory, what's important is absence of facts contradicting with it. Therefore you can't know if theory is right. You can only know if its wrong.

Which brings us to falsifiability. Any modern scientific theory should be falsifiable which means there should be a clear answer to "What should happen for you to give up on your views". Otherwise that would be something like Russell's teapot.

Since there's no experiment that can prove/disprove existence of god, do you believe or not is purely emotional. No, " turn water into wine pls" is not an experiment that can disprove faith, at least for Christianity.
 
All the Abrahamic religions are made and maintained by kikes to fuck over the gentiles, paganism can be based if put in the right minds ( IE non wiccan)
 

Similar threads

RealSchizo
Replies
4
Views
280
InceldianWarrior
InceldianWarrior
Stupid Clown
Replies
8
Views
285
go2sleep
go2sleep
svgmn1
Replies
20
Views
414
EgyptianNiggerKANG
EgyptianNiggerKANG
RealSchizo
Replies
12
Views
519
The Abyss
The Abyss
Simba
Replies
22
Views
495
Simba
Simba

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top