Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Toxic Femininity Dried up hole and former harlot blames men for the fact she was a whore

  • Thread starter Deleted member 17245
  • Start date
Deleted member 17245

Deleted member 17245

schizoidcel
-
Joined
Feb 24, 2019
Posts
2,714
This former pornrat who became famous for having her photo-op, whom she sold to Playboy, adopted by computer graphics specialists back in the 70's as a benchmark for measuring image and color reproduction now wants to guilt trip you for being a sinner. All men share in this guilt of her willingly spreading her legs for the camera, therefore you now have to bow out of careermaxxing and work at the local garbage dump or sewage processing plant to make way for more holes in the tech industry. Soon, all dried up former pornrats will make demands of all men to conform to the matriarchy because the foids themselves couldn't help but be whores for a paycheck. Men are always to blame.

1575852514476
 
Can someon still manage to find her full nude set? If it's reverse psychology it worked, because now I want to fap to it.
 
Stunning and brave
 
Can someon still manage to find her full nude set? If it's reverse psychology it worked, because now I want to fap to it.
Considering it's from the 70's she would probably be super hairy down there.
 
Google is cucked, I found it without a problem on Duckduckgo.

lena-soderberg-miss-november-1972-vintage-playboy-28-800x1201.jpg

I can fap to this.
 
Workcels, time to give up your jobs and give them to a woman.

Time for you to NEET
 
Ever notice that these girls only get this righteous, when they did slutty crap, when their use is all over and done with?
 
"Losing Lena?" What does that mean? What is the issue here?
 
No one forced her to be a whore
 
Hoe stop crying.
 
I wouldn't call Lena a whore unless she was selling sex for money (she probably was) because nude modeling isn't sex.

I don't think we should put too much focus on this gramma: she's clearly just being used as a prop by POV-pushing whiners.

Women are complaining like this made them uncomfortable because the guys who created tech (nobody is stopping ladies from doing this, they just want to piggyback on male accomplishments and take over their groups) used a then-beautiful woman as a standard of QUALITY when assessing image tech.

This isn't harassment of women at all, it's literally just a side-effect of male thirst, of prioritizing women, of putting them on a pedestal. Women exploit this ALL THE TIME, and this side effect does nothing at all to harm them.

Movements like this are participated in by women who don't want to spend as much time actually fucking coding as the men leading the industry. I'm sure there's lots of them more talented/knowledgeable than I am (I actually know bupkiss about this field) but I'm betting for each one that does there are at least ten guys who know more and work harder.

Pushing bullshit like this it what helps construct this bad image and why only thirsty betas will employ them for their pussy instead of their possible talent. Those who actually DO have talent, won't get it recognized because of untalented women pushing initiatives like these to make talk more about what is PC and not what is best tech.
 
Streisand effect? Now everyone will go search for her long forgotten nudes instead.
 
You're missing the point: she WANTS that. She WANTS the attention. She's shlicking to it.

That's why she's going along with this campaign. It's not about her at all, she's a PROP.

What this is about is basically the same bullshit as what happened with Matt Taylor where they're complaining about his fucking SHIRT choice instead of talking about how he landed a satellite on a comet.

They're mad because guys invented tech, and since tech is a cockfest, they chose a hot girl as their test image.

Now foids infiltrate this (having contributed little by comparison) but want to dictate terms of the culture.

Exact same shit which also happens in anime, video games, etc.
 
"Losing Lena?" What does that mean? What is the issue here?

In the field of computer graphics, this picture of a woman wearing a hat is often used as a test image. It first appeared in some academic papers back in the 1970s and then it got copied and used as a test image by other academics in other papers because it's pretty. For a while nobody even knew where it came from.

Eventually (in the late 1990s/early 2000s i think) somebody managed to figure out where it originally came from. It's cropped from an old issue of Playboy magazine, and the hat is the only thing she's wearing.

The "issue" here is just normal feminist bullshit. It's a very tame image by porn standards, and the version that was published in those papers only shows her face so that you can't even tell she's naked.

Lena
 
A cumdumpster should always be treated like a cumdumpster
full
 
In the field of computer graphics, this picture of a woman wearing a hat is often used as a test image. It first appeared in some academic papers back in the 1970s and then it got copied and used as a test image by other academics in other papers because it's pretty. For a while nobody even knew where it came from.

Eventually (in the late 1990s/early 2000s i think) somebody managed to figure out where it originally came from. It's cropped from an old issue of Playboy magazine, and the hat is the only thing she's wearing.

The "issue" here is just normal feminist bullshit. It's a very tame image by porn standards, and the version that was published in those papers only shows her face so that you can't even tell she's naked.

View attachment 175897

I'm aware of what the picture is, but what does "Losing Lena" mean?
 
In the field of computer graphics, this picture of a woman wearing a hat is often used as a test image. It first appeared in some academic papers back in the 1970s and then it got copied and used as a test image by other academics in other papers because it's pretty. For a while nobody even knew where it came from.

Eventually (in the late 1990s/early 2000s i think) somebody managed to figure out where it originally came from. It's cropped from an old issue of Playboy magazine, and the hat is the only thing she's wearing.

The "issue" here is just normal feminist bullshit. It's a very tame image by porn standards, and the version that was published in those papers only shows her face so that you can't even tell she's naked.

View attachment 175897

That is some cool stuff. I don't even know what she is complaining about, the image is censored. No one knows she is nude. Plus its is an honor to be used for your image to be used in such a productive way.
 
:feelspuke::feelspuke::feelspuke:
Imagine that roast beef
 
Worthless slut, may she suffer a long & painful death to purge her from all the sluttery she's done.
 
It's not like anyone can recognize her anyway, is it ?
 
she going to pay back the fee she got for the photoshoot then?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top