Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Does involuntary celibate count as a spectrum?

Is involuntary celibacy an spectrum?


  • Total voters
    21
Jotasso

Jotasso

children of soulless dead entities
★★★
Joined
Aug 24, 2022
Posts
203
I recognize that there are certain traits that by itself characterize someone as truecel (mono-eyebrow and autism, for example) but I also realize that there are guys who have 3-4 unattractive characteristics in a small proportion and still manage to have relationships with foids. It makes me think that involuntary celibacy could be both a large set of factors and just one or a few. What do you guys think about this?
 
Double post.
Edit the one you have man.
 
There are some incels a foid could tolerate but haven’t had the luck to meet one who does. Others would remain incel no matter their circumstances.
 
Absolutely yes. There are many ways of making incels, from having average looks and bad upbringing to full-blown autistic burn victim incel. The result is mostly the same (inceldom), but, theoretically, some would need less improvements to ascend than others.
 
not really
either you're one or you're not
 
They increase in amplitude. Example: short + ugly (anything that’s not abiding by the male beauty standards) + social anxiety or autism = potential inceldom.

I don’t think you’re qualified as unhealthy-looking (ergo incel) if you’re just autistic or have a unibrow.

I also realize that there are guys who have 3-4 unattractive characteristics in a small proportion and still manage to have relationships with foids.
It’s anecdotal but obviously, not impossible to establish a relationship if you’re semi-ugly (keyword here being semi), but the question at hand is: how concrete are those? How much does the experience of an ugly person differentiate with that of a good-looking? For how long could they hold onto that relationship in comparison to the non-ugly?

I think what a lot of normies, including the ones on this forum, fail to realize is that ultimately, it’s not about getting her, it’s about keeping her. And before you “they’re not objects” me into the Reddit oblivion, I don’t mean it in a literal sense. I’m simply implying that your looks aren’t just the gateway, they’re what’s going to keep the relationship intact. Ugly people have ugly lives, and this isn’t what you want to hear right now, but the suffering won’t just end with you getting laid once. You have to KEEP ON doing it.
 
some normies think they are not inkwell delude in spectrum and get whiff of pussy once in 5 year.
sweet lies
 
There are truecels then there are those under age-24-25 who haven't hit the normie stride yet but 90% probably will, the statistics dictate after age 23 it is over bar a miracle
 
I agree, from what I know lots of incels had some mental health problems. But I believe there are also some unknowns in here. I like the concept of uncanny valley, its related to human like robots but works IMO also for subhumans.
 
Jannies pls ban this whore imposter
 
I am not officially diagnosed, but it's obvious that I am not normie.
 
Yes. Inceldom at its mildest means that you can careermaxx and make friends. You still can't get laid, but you can live a semi-normal life outside of sex and relationships. People at this end of the spectrum are usually 4/10 in terms of looks, but their lives are mired by a bad upbringing or chronic social anxiety.

Inceldom at its most extreme completely isolates you. You can't find work, earn a decent living or make any friends. You are bullied and ostracised wherever you go. People at this end of the spectrum are either deformed, burn victims or severely disabled.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top