G
Guest2
Guest
I mean, gay men tend to want to be fucked up the ass or whatever, and submissive men are more open to being gay it seems. Girls who are submissive are more attracted to men because they are more dominant, and usually don't want to have sex with a female, because they wouldn't be able to be dominated by them as easily.
There are fewer dominant gay men, and more "camp" and girly men, because I'm thinking that fetishes and whatnot override or even define sexuality: gay guys are gay because they want to be dominated in a certain way, and so they are attracted to the most dominant type of person, similarly to how a female would feel.
Dominant women don't really exist because, well, idk; that doesn't really fit into this analogy, because there are plenty of beta males, and females don't tend to go lesbian to go dominate females.
Another thought I just had that might explain it is that, because men are the aggressors and instigators of sex (I use those words because, in evolution, sex is primarily rape), and so would be developing these instincts while females wouldn't.
Also, women were never pressured to be dominant in any way in tribal or pre-homo-sapien times - they were always submissive because it maximised survival chances - but some beta males would have to be more like females and reside under others, or risk being killed by the bigger men.
But anyways, I keep having thoughts while I'm writing this, so it probably doesn't entirely add up, and I'm like "oh yeah that makes sense too" then it goes out of my head 2 seconds later. I'm partially using this to remember some rough thoughts (not those kind of rough thoughts, baka hentai!)
didnt read; just lol: the title
There are fewer dominant gay men, and more "camp" and girly men, because I'm thinking that fetishes and whatnot override or even define sexuality: gay guys are gay because they want to be dominated in a certain way, and so they are attracted to the most dominant type of person, similarly to how a female would feel.
Dominant women don't really exist because, well, idk; that doesn't really fit into this analogy, because there are plenty of beta males, and females don't tend to go lesbian to go dominate females.
Another thought I just had that might explain it is that, because men are the aggressors and instigators of sex (I use those words because, in evolution, sex is primarily rape), and so would be developing these instincts while females wouldn't.
Also, women were never pressured to be dominant in any way in tribal or pre-homo-sapien times - they were always submissive because it maximised survival chances - but some beta males would have to be more like females and reside under others, or risk being killed by the bigger men.
But anyways, I keep having thoughts while I'm writing this, so it probably doesn't entirely add up, and I'm like "oh yeah that makes sense too" then it goes out of my head 2 seconds later. I'm partially using this to remember some rough thoughts (not those kind of rough thoughts, baka hentai!)
didnt read; just lol: the title





