PTSD Marsupials
Recruit
★★★★
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2025
- Posts
- 323
- Online time
- 14h 46m
Summary at the bottom.
First of all the concept of a soul is already difficult to define, but in general it's considered to be an abstract thing that's separated from the physical world and is part of what defines a person.
There's no evidence that they DO exist, but there's no evidence that they DON'T either. You could compare this problem to a thought experiment called "Last Thursday", where the premise is that last Thursday the entire universe was created from scratch including your memories, which sounds ludricous but is impossible to disprove. Sure you might remember the universe existing before last Thursday but those memories could be fake because on Thursday EVERYTHING was created.
So is the Last Thursday theory true? Of course not, it's common sense. Any theory that can't be disproven loses all credibility, that's why troll theories like Last Thursday are false.
Thus, on first glance it seems that the idea of "souls" is comparable to the Last Thursday theory since their existence can't be disproven. But there is a big difference: the Last Thursday theory was a thought experiment created specifically to illustrate a point, while "souls" seem to be a concept shared by ALL of humanity. Everyone seems to understand the concept of a soul, which is incredible because we can't even define what a soul is. You could ask a grade schooler if they know what a soul is and they'll say yes, but of course they wouldn't be able to define it. There are lots of things we can't define in words, such as colour, but obviously they exist. Could souls be similar?
SUMMARY:
Souls, while impossible to define and observe properly can be "understood". People universally "know" what a soul in the same way they "know" what colour is. This means that the concept of souls can't be compared to troll theories like "The sky turns purple but only when you aren't looking and if it isn't being recorded" because it has a baseline of being intrinsically understood by the entire human population.
First of all the concept of a soul is already difficult to define, but in general it's considered to be an abstract thing that's separated from the physical world and is part of what defines a person.
There's no evidence that they DO exist, but there's no evidence that they DON'T either. You could compare this problem to a thought experiment called "Last Thursday", where the premise is that last Thursday the entire universe was created from scratch including your memories, which sounds ludricous but is impossible to disprove. Sure you might remember the universe existing before last Thursday but those memories could be fake because on Thursday EVERYTHING was created.
So is the Last Thursday theory true? Of course not, it's common sense. Any theory that can't be disproven loses all credibility, that's why troll theories like Last Thursday are false.
Thus, on first glance it seems that the idea of "souls" is comparable to the Last Thursday theory since their existence can't be disproven. But there is a big difference: the Last Thursday theory was a thought experiment created specifically to illustrate a point, while "souls" seem to be a concept shared by ALL of humanity. Everyone seems to understand the concept of a soul, which is incredible because we can't even define what a soul is. You could ask a grade schooler if they know what a soul is and they'll say yes, but of course they wouldn't be able to define it. There are lots of things we can't define in words, such as colour, but obviously they exist. Could souls be similar?
SUMMARY:
Souls, while impossible to define and observe properly can be "understood". People universally "know" what a soul in the same way they "know" what colour is. This means that the concept of souls can't be compared to troll theories like "The sky turns purple but only when you aren't looking and if it isn't being recorded" because it has a baseline of being intrinsically understood by the entire human population.





