D
Deleted member 3497
VX
-
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2021
- Posts
- 10,524
If you have any other solutions in mind, elab on them.
Foids were invented to fuck and have babies. They would eventually yield if Chad is not an optionIt’s not, because women will just choose to be alone rather than with some sub4 subhuman. If he’s rich, she will be with him and cuck him for Chad. Only solution is state-paid prostitution where taxpayers pay for them.
To normie? yes (while cheating with chad). To ugly subhumans? NoFoids were invented to fuck and have babies. They would eventually yield if Chad is not an option
With enforced monogamy Normans also wouldn’t also be available, that is the beauty of itTo normie? yes (while cheating with chad). To ugly subhumans? No
What?With enforced monogamy Normans also wouldn’t also be available, that is the beauty of it
High IQ post.Enforced monogamy + female dependence on male breadwinner + arranged marriage...
If you have these three factors, you can create pretty much universal marriage. Back in the 15th century, 95% of women were married by the age of 25 years old, most of the 5% that weren't were prostitutes who married shortly after retirement whether at the age of 25 or at 30. 15th century Europe rarely allowed divorce or annulments even and certainly did not allow polygamy, at this point concubinage had been banned as well, so we can extrapolate from this that pretty much every man in the 15th century got married. Before marriage, most men lost their virginity to prostitutes.
The reason why enforced monogamy works is because it takes chad out of the dating pool. He is already married to a girl who expects him to stay faithful, and in the 15th century, if a guy was going to cheat on his wife he generally did it with a prostitute instead of another man's wife (since the man would probably beat him up if discovered). If all the chads are married, then women's hypergamous instincts will be forcefully repressed and they'll have to settle for their looks-match. With female dependence on male breadwinners, it makes it impossible for women to just choose not to marry anyone. If they depend on men's income, and are forced to settle for their looks match, then you should get a pretty even distribution. Mentalcels would cease to exist given that women couldn't be picky anymore about that, less attractive men with more money could get a girl who's more attractive then they are. Men who are violent criminals could be taken out of the dating pool entirely due to the stigma attached to their behavior and girls who seek out dominant bad boys are ruthlessly shamed in societies like that.
this unfortunately.It’s not, because women will just choose to be alone rather than with some sub4 subhuman.
Not even just feminists but also the kratocratic side of the right.I'm a huge supporter of monogamy.
Pro-eugenics feminists think human societies better thrive when the only people reproducing are Chad and his harem. If this was always the case, then K selection wouldn't exist. Plus in monogamous societies, high genetic quality individuals tend to marry each other anyways.
Monogamy and civilization go hand in hand.
High IQ post.
Maybe in jewdom(jewrope and jewnited states). Its not much of an "enforced" Monogamy if foids have a choiceIt’s not, because women will just choose to be alone rather than with some sub4 subhuman.
This. This is what I've been saying all along.Enforced monogamy + female dependence on male breadwinner + arranged marriage...
If you have these three factors, you can create pretty much universal marriage. Back in the 15th century, 95% of women were married by the age of 25 years old, most of the 5% that weren't were prostitutes who married shortly after retirement whether at the age of 25 or at 30. 15th century Europe rarely allowed divorce or annulments even and certainly did not allow polygamy, at this point concubinage had been banned as well, so we can extrapolate from this that pretty much every man in the 15th century got married. Before marriage, most men lost their virginity to prostitutes.
The reason why enforced monogamy works is because it takes chad out of the dating pool. He is already married to a girl who expects him to stay faithful, and in the 15th century, if a guy was going to cheat on his wife he generally did it with a prostitute instead of another man's wife (since the man would probably beat him up if discovered). If all the chads are married, then women's hypergamous instincts will be forcefully repressed and they'll have to settle for their looks-match. With female dependence on male breadwinners, it makes it impossible for women to just choose not to marry anyone. If they depend on men's income, and are forced to settle for their looks match, then you should get a pretty even distribution. Mentalcels would cease to exist given that women couldn't be picky anymore about that, less attractive men with more money could get a girl who's more attractive then they are. Men who are violent criminals could be taken out of the dating pool entirely due to the stigma attached to their behavior and girls who seek out dominant bad boys are ruthlessly shamed in societies like that.
Just arranged marriagemaxxIt’s not, because women will just choose to be alone rather than with some sub4 subhuman. If he’s rich, she will be with him and cuck him for Chad. Only solution is state-paid prostitution where taxpayers pay for them.
Based. Only system that works= monogamy with foids dependent on men to surviveEnforced monogamy + female dependence on male breadwinner + arranged marriage...
If you have these three factors, you can create pretty much universal marriage. Back in the 15th century, 95% of women were married by the age of 25 years old, most of the 5% that weren't were prostitutes who married shortly after retirement whether at the age of 25 or at 30. 15th century Europe rarely allowed divorce or annulments even and certainly did not allow polygamy, at this point concubinage had been banned as well, so we can extrapolate from this that pretty much every man in the 15th century got married. Before marriage, most men lost their virginity to prostitutes.
The reason why enforced monogamy works is because it takes chad out of the dating pool. He is already married to a girl who expects him to stay faithful, and in the 15th century, if a guy was going to cheat on his wife he generally did it with a prostitute instead of another man's wife (since the man would probably beat him up if discovered). If all the chads are married, then women's hypergamous instincts will be forcefully repressed and they'll have to settle for their looks-match. With female dependence on male breadwinners, it makes it impossible for women to just choose not to marry anyone. If they depend on men's income, and are forced to settle for their looks match, then you should get a pretty even distribution. Mentalcels would cease to exist given that women couldn't be picky anymore about that, less attractive men with more money could get a girl who's more attractive then they are. Men who are violent criminals could be taken out of the dating pool entirely due to the stigma attached to their behavior and girls who seek out dominant bad boys are ruthlessly shamed in societies like that.
Foids always had a choice. Places with forced marriages also usually means the man is forced to marry some random chick. And guess what, she will secretly fuck someone she is actually attracted to.Yes. It is the only viable solution which was known to work.
Maybe in jewdom(jewrope and jewnited states). Its not much of an "enforced" Monogamy if foids have a choice
I get where you're coming from. People who've never lived outside jewdom would never understand how every civilized society worked for hundreds of years before it was all plunged into madnessFoids always had a choice. Places with forced marriages also usually means the man is forced to marry some random chick. And guess what, she will secretly fuck someone she is actually attracted to.
Cope, genetic testing and comparing to family trees shows that this has always been going on, and still goes on outside the west.I get where you're coming from. People who've never lived outside jewdom would never understand how every civilized society worked for hundreds of years before it was all plunged into madness
??? No it isn't.Cope, genetic testing and comparing to family trees shows that this has always been going on, and still goes on outside the west.
Wym you mean no???? No it isn't.
Yes its a viable solution, because it already was solving inceldom, the "patriarchal" norms of the past pretty much enforced monogamy indirectly because it prevented women from being able to work and own property, so every man was "dating up" from a woman's standpoint, so all men as a collective had a decent chanceIf you have any other solutions in mind, elab on them.
Based! Another solution would be excluding women from having any say in mating/sex whatsoever.It’s not, because women will just choose to be alone rather than with some sub4 subhuman. If he’s rich, she will be with him and cuck him for Chad. Only solution is state-paid prostitution where taxpayers pay for them.
That’s never going to happenBased! Another solution would be excluding women from having any say in mating/sex whatsoever.
Well, it used to be that way before the 20th centuryThat’s never going to happen
Yeah, back when males had no say either.Well, it used to be that way before the 20th century