Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Discussion Do you think Chads/Stacys are smarter than us?

Op the incel commuinity and looks theory was created by chads that got laid.
oDKVIaZ.jpg

If this site allowed people to talk about getting laid like the others did you would be surprised by the number of chads that would appear.
 
Why would I need to cope? I have a 142 IQ so I'm not trying to feel better about myself, I value intelligence a lot so when I find it on other people I don't get salty and jelous, I respect them. I'm just saying that most good looking people are intelligent is not true, you can also know this by common sense: smart people are a minority, so even among good looking people they will be a minority too.
142 IQ but has to rely on annedoctal because he cannot accept the truth, such is the power of the blackpill :cryfeels::cryfeels: Brutal :feelsrope:
Op the incel commuinity and looks theory was created by chads that got laid.
oDKVIaZ.jpg

If this site allowed people to talk about getting laid like the others did you would be surprised by the number of chads that would appear.
some of these are not chads
 
142 IQ but has to rely on annedoctal because he cannot accept the truth, such is the power of the blackpill :cryfeels::cryfeels: Brutal :feelsrope:
Okay, so let's look at facts:
-135 IQ has a 99% percentile, so only 1% of the population has an IQ equal or above 135. So roughly 75 million people have a high IQ. Do you think there are only 75 million good looking people? Good looking people are way more than just 1% of the global population.
 
Okay, so let's look at facts:
-135 IQ has a 99% percentile, so only 1% of the population has an IQ equal or above 135. So roughly 75 million people have a high IQ. Do you think there are only 75 million good looking people? Good looking people are way more than just 1% of the global population.
I'm starting to doubt your IQ claim. Is that your understanding of statistics? Do you understand what correlation mean?
"In the broadest sense correlation is any statistical association, though it commonly refers to the degree to which a pair of variables are linearly related "
It doesn't mean every good looking person will be high IQ, also doesn't mean every single ugly person will be high IQ, It doesn't even mean every high IQ person will be goodlooking. There are multiple factors, and one of those factors is looks. They have been shown to have a high correlation with IQ, there's no debate about that, all you have done till now is shown annedoctal evidence. And even though you denied it, your arguments fit exactly into the definition of annedoctal evidence.
 
Those people are the exceptions of exceptions, do you really think a Chad will waste his whole life studying when he could be a model and get richer and have tons of women around him?

He seems to love wasting his whole life practicing a sport.

He also seems to love getting send to other countries to shoot people and getting shot at or blown to bits.

Could it be that Chad is just a specific human type and not the pinnacle of humanity as such?
 
I'm starting to doubt your IQ claim. Is that your understanding of statistics? Do you understand what correlation mean?
"In the broadest sense correlation is any statistical association, though it commonly refers to the degree to which a pair of variables are linearly related "
It doesn't mean every good looking person will be high IQ, also doesn't mean every single ugly person will be high IQ, It doesn't even mean every high IQ person will be goodlooking. There are multiple factors, and one of those factors is looks. They have been shown to have a high correlation with IQ, there's no debate about that, all you have done till now is shown annedoctal evidence. And even though you denied it, your arguments fit exactly into the definition of annedoctal evidence.
I know what it means but when people here say there's a correlation they don't just mean ''oh, you know, it's just another factor'', they mean that it's an important part and that it's much more likely to find a good looking person with a high IQ than an ugly person with one, I've heard this over and over on this site and I think that's it's at best an exaggeration.
 
I know what it means but when people here say there's a correlation they don't just mean ''oh, you know, it's just another factor'', they mean that it's an important part and that it's much more likely to find a good looking person with a high IQ than an ugly person with one, I've heard this over and over on this site and I think that's it's at best an exaggeration.
"it's much more likely to find a good looking person with a high IQ than an ugly person with one"
There are more ugly people so of course it's more likely to find someone ugly with high IQ.
But between a goodlooking person and an ugly person, it's more likely that the first one has higher IQ. That's what the data says, that's the correlation.
 
Can someone find actual data? I don't want your silly little anecdotes.

I am ugly. I crush the vast majority of individuals I encounter when it comes to standardized testing. But I alone am not representative of the population.

Okay, so let's look at facts:
-135 IQ has a 99% percentile, so only 1% of the population has an IQ equal or above 135. So roughly 75 million people have a high IQ. Do you think there are only 75 million good looking people? Good looking people are way more than just 1% of the global population.

Your IQ has to be in the 99th percentile for it to be "high"? Someone with a 95th percentile IQ doesn't count?

OP, welcome to the world of statistics. I recommend that you read up on hypothesis testing before you proceed further.

School grades are possibly influenced by the Halo effect. What you need to do is to conduct a blind trial where a randomly selected pool of subjects take a computer-graded test. Then you take a panel of volunteers who individually grade (to avoid peer pressure) the attractiveness of those subjects. Once you have controlled for race, gender, age, educational attainment, and socioeconomic status, you crunch the numbers to find if there exists any correlation, and whether such a correlation is statistically significant using a goodness of fit test.
 
Last edited:
For decades we've said that people do not like smart people. I will admit there are a lot of different ways to measure smarts and some might be totally wrong
 
Normies don't understand smart people but they usually respect them if their intellectual abilities are matched with something normies CAN understand, which is status. So a doctor or a professor will receive praise from normies, but a nerd hiding in his basement won't get much recognition, no matter how smart he may be.
 
If you are high IQ you will tell people IQ don´t matter, it´s all hard work. (yes, some boy learned 10 languages by age of 4 because he was working hard (lol).

If you are good looking you will keep telling people that looks don´t matter and it´s all about good personality.

All these people just lie, because they gain more status by doing so.
truth. motherfuckers have godlike imagination and visual skills in art classes and then they say it was "muh hardworking" same shit with iq and studying
 
I have a high IQ, but academics wise, 98% of the people I met are smarter than me.
 
makes no difference looks are everything IQ means nothing.
 
all these guys coping with *muh intelligence*.
 
Some Chads maybe. Stacies are always stupid
 
School grades are possibly influenced by the Halo effect. What you need to do is to conduct a blind trial where a randomly selected pool of subjects take a computer-graded test. Then you take a panel of volunteers who individually grade (to avoid peer pressure) the attractiveness of those subjects. Once you have controlled for race, gender, age, educational attainment, and socioeconomic status, you crunch the numbers to find if there exists any correlation, and whether such a correlation is statistically significant using a goodness of fit test
I definitely agree that there is a correlation between being successful and good looking, but being successful is not the same thing as being inteligent. Your idea is good but I don't see myself wasting time to know wheter or not there is a correlation, but I will see if in the future someone does.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

R
Replies
26
Views
1K
Emba
Emba
Grodd
Replies
19
Views
967
Grodd
Grodd
Yabadadabadoo
Replies
9
Views
536
Maikowski
Maikowski
Shinichi
Replies
16
Views
838
superpsycho
superpsycho
fullofchagrin
Replies
8
Views
256
GrandWizard_137
GrandWizard_137

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top