RelentlessAssault
Legalize nuclear weaponry for daily use
★
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2023
- Posts
- 2,334
IMO Melvin is the most truecel name
Also Arthur, joshua, Kevin
Also Arthur, joshua, Kevin
I wish I was named like that in real lifeRelentlessAssault
Lee, NguyenMohammed, Rajesh
Elliot
Nah those names are okay. It's only shitskin names and uncommon chink names that are bad.Lee, Nguyen
Seung-Hui comes to mind.uncommon chink names
I know one person irl named Dylan and he’s a 6’5 chadElliot, Dylan
Herbert is a truecel name
Muhammad is literally the name with the most numbers of people using it in the world. It literally goes from a Chad to a gigatrucel.Muhammad, Li, Pajeet, Vlad
Pretty much every ethnic name.
The name itself is incel tier though, due to so many inbred sand niggers and curries having it.Muhammad is literally the name with the most numbers of people using it in the world. It literally goes from a Chad to a gigatrucel.
It doesn't make any statistical sense.The name itself is incel tier though, due to so many inbred sand niggers and curries having it.
Why not? Most sands and curries look subhuman.It doesn't make any statistical sense.
Because even if we take your hypothesis that the majority of sands and curries (they are not the only Muslims, we should add Indonesians, Malays, former countries and regions of the USSR, converts...) in every society a Gaussian bell is always created that divides society into incels, normies, and chads. And it is clear that every society is going to find the normies as the majority of sexhavers. Unless, on the contrary, you want to focus your analysis on ethnics living in white countries, which in any case would make them to locationcels, and yet we see, for example, in Europe, that many sandnormies have no problem finding a foid to fuck.Why not? Most sands and curries look subhuman.
Many sand niggers have no problem in Europe because those are the better looking ones. Most still look like shit. So obviously when they come to white countries people will associate those names with subhumanity.Because even if we take your hypothesis that the majority of sands and curries (they are not the only Muslims, we should add Indonesians, Malays, former countries and regions of the USSR, converts...) in every society a Gaussian bell is always created that divides society into incels, normies, and chads. And it is clear that every society is going to find the normies as the majority of sexhavers. Unless, on the contrary, you want to focus your analysis on ethnics living in white countries, which in any case would make them to locationcels, and yet we see, for example, in Europe, that many sandnormies have no problem finding a foid to fuck.
But here's the thing, most sandniggers don't live in Niggastan, so it can't be inferred that Whitestan sandniggers are a representative sample of anything.Many sand niggers have no problem in Europe because those are the better looking ones. Most still look like shit. So obviously when they come to white countries people will associate those names with subhumanity.
And the Soviet and rice Muslims aren’t fleeing their countries to live in white countries on the scale curries and sand niggers are, so that’s irrelevant.
We are talking about in the Weat. Obviously Muhammad won’t have a negative halo in sand nigger landBut here's the thing, most sandniggers don't live in Niggastan, so it can't be inferred that Whitestan sandniggers are a representative sample of anything.
And yet, out of, say, 300 or 400 million Muhammads in the world, we cannot take this as given. Furthermore, it would be speculative without data, and irrational to think that the Muhammads distribution does not follow a statistical distribution like any other name.
Muhammad, Li, Pajeet, Vlad
Pretty much every ethnic name.





