if i was the dictator of the world here's what i would do:
CHADS AND STACIES: would be required, by law, to have at least one or two babies, wouldnt be required to raise them though, the state would be in charge of that if they refused to partake in the child's upbringing. Would be immediately doxxed from it if such had drug problems, genetic diseases or too large (or too horrible) criminal sheets.
NORMIES AND BECKIES: would be allowed to have kids of their own IF they showed any athletical, academical or any sort of extremely valuable prowess in any activity deem worthy of appraise by the state and society in general. Said activity would have to be evaluated by a public counsel regarded publicly as extensively worthy of such task.
SUB 5S IN GENERAL: now we enter the it's over category. Would be given a significant other by the state if they proved to have had a vasectomy (and have had their ovaries plumped if they're a foid).
Yes, i do think ugly people shouldnt have kids, to spare them the misery of having a sub 5 life. Some might come at me and say "wat bout muh genetic recombination" thats ridicoulous level brainlet argument. We all know two hot people have much more chance at making pretty babies than non hot people. Even normies can. Sub 5s? I dont think so. Changes are too slim and i dont want their kids to pay the price.
CHADS AND STACIES: would be required, by law, to have at least one or two babies, wouldnt be required to raise them though, the state would be in charge of that if they refused to partake in the child's upbringing. Would be immediately doxxed from it if such had drug problems, genetic diseases or too large (or too horrible) criminal sheets.
NORMIES AND BECKIES: would be allowed to have kids of their own IF they showed any athletical, academical or any sort of extremely valuable prowess in any activity deem worthy of appraise by the state and society in general. Said activity would have to be evaluated by a public counsel regarded publicly as extensively worthy of such task.
SUB 5S IN GENERAL: now we enter the it's over category. Would be given a significant other by the state if they proved to have had a vasectomy (and have had their ovaries plumped if they're a foid).
Yes, i do think ugly people shouldnt have kids, to spare them the misery of having a sub 5 life. Some might come at me and say "wat bout muh genetic recombination" thats ridicoulous level brainlet argument. We all know two hot people have much more chance at making pretty babies than non hot people. Even normies can. Sub 5s? I dont think so. Changes are too slim and i dont want their kids to pay the price.
